Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Exile+

Channel

Exile+

@exile_plus

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

23,635subscribers

+7,673 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003717915317
TypeChannel
Username@exile_plus
DescriptionНовинний канал проекту: https://t.me/exilenova_plus Ми також є в X та в Instagram: https://x.com/exilenova_plus Поділитися новиною та вашими матеріалами: @Exilenova_Bot
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held66
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/exile_plus

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@exile_plus/2872 · this entry27 Oct 2026, 09:11 UTC@exilenova_plus/3353827 Oct 2026, 09:13 UTC1.002 minutes
@exile_plus/2936 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 10:33 UTC@exilenova_plus/339372 Nov 2026, 10:39 UTC1.007 minutes
@exile_plus/2958 · this entry5 Nov 2026, 04:32 UTC@exilenova_plus/340945 Nov 2026, 04:39 UTC1.007 minutes
@exile_plus/2425 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC@captain_parker/8247928 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC1.003 minutes
@exile_plus/2982 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 05:24 UTC@captain_parker/915676 Nov 2026, 05:25 UTC1.00under a minute
@exile_plus/2999 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 16:52 UTC@captain_parker/919208 Nov 2026, 16:54 UTC1.002 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@exilenova_plus21 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003 minutesthis entry (21–0)
@captain_parker6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003 minutesthis entry (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 157 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Views per post sit far above this size band

43,300 average views per post against 23,501 subscribers — an engagement rate of 184.1%. Across the 1,578 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,011–31,608 subscribers, posting mainly in Ukrainian — the middle half sit between 11.6% and 32.2%, with a median of 19.6%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured48 of 48 published in the window (0 exact, 48 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled2,076,540
Mature posts only216.1% over 33 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers23,501 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb10000:ukr · 1,578 channels · p10 6.79% · p25 11.6% · p50 19.6% · p75 32.2% · p90 50.0%
Position in cohort99.556th percentile · 9.4× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.132% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageUkrainian · 90.7% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the keys clone_source · err_high, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

15,93523,63519,7856 August 202610 November 2026
66 measurements spanning 97 days, net +7,673. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,780–24,790 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 21:1123,635+52
9 Nov 2026, 08:1723,583-16
7 Nov 2026, 22:4723,599+4
7 Nov 2026, 00:0523,595+45
6 Nov 2026, 03:1123,550+49
5 Nov 2026, 05:5123,501+51
4 Nov 2026, 07:2823,450+13
3 Nov 2026, 10:3923,437+52
2 Nov 2026, 11:1623,385+124
1 Nov 2026, 07:4023,261-11
31 Oct 2026, 06:4023,272-4
30 Oct 2026, 08:0623,276-2
29 Oct 2026, 07:0623,278-15
28 Oct 2026, 07:2923,293+93
27 Oct 2026, 10:1623,200+62
26 Oct 2026, 08:0623,138+1,270
25 Oct 2026, 11:1021,868+142
24 Oct 2026, 14:2121,726+36
23 Oct 2026, 15:0821,690+36
22 Oct 2026, 13:5921,654first reading

Engagement

307 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
150.0%
avg views ÷ 23,635 subscribers
Avg views / post
35,500
106 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
106
of 307 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held307 (3 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total3,757,725
Reactions total70,090
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 14:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,650
Videos
≈836
Links
≈249

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
32m 59s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 74 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

188,165 reactions across 295 posts, in 62 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥82,36343.8%
😁22,64712.0%
💯15,8638.43%
👍15,4108.19%
❤13,4527.15%
🤬11,4026.06%
🤣8,8944.73%
🤡5,2382.78%
😢3,4731.85%
🙏3,1771.69%
🤔7510.399%
🎉6630.352%
👀6220.331%
😈4860.258%
😱4540.241%
👏3880.206%
😭3560.189%
🍾3460.184%
🥰3090.164%
💔2280.121%
42 further kinds1,6430.873%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 306 of the 307 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193,780 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 307 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 306 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @exile_plus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 307 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 15 of 106 posts held from the last 30 days (14.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 14:37 UTC765 views76 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⚠️ Ударники СОУ подолали близько 3000 км та уразили найбільший за потужністю нафтопереробний завод Росії – Омський НПЗ Підприємство входить до структури «Газпром нефти» та має проєктну потужність переробки понад 21 млн тонн сирої нафти на рік. Це близько 10% від загального обсягу нафтопереробки Росії Завод спеціалізується на виробництві автомобільного бензину АІ-92, АІ-95 та G-Drive 100, дизельного пального стандар…

🔥62❤13👍1

11 Nov 2026, 14:18 UTC≈2,490 views240 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Небо в Омську перетворилось на вайби Мордору.

🔥207❤16👍15🤩2

11 Nov 2026, 13:47 UTC≈3,970 views343 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

В Омську продовжуються вибухи. Вже збились рахувати, скільки.

🔥290👍31❤15🙏4🤡1🤬1😡1

11 Nov 2026, 13:02 UTC≈4,960 views275 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Квартиру інтегровано в русскьий мир

🤣245😁25❤5

11 Nov 2026, 11:25 UTC≈6,480 views260 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🤣219🤡30🔥5🍌4😁2

11 Nov 2026, 10:57 UTC≈7,030 views492 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Десь в полях України валяється Байден. 🤷‍♂️

😁283🤣170🔥18👍14🤷‍♀4❤2🤡1

11 Nov 2026, 10:48 UTC≈6,980 views541 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Бєлгородщина, атака на зв'язок ворога.

🔥406👍79👏29🥰16❤5🤝2✍1🍌1

11 Nov 2026, 06:24 UTC≈108,000 views715 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

👌

🤣539😁88🤡49👏12🤯9🔥7😱6🍌4

11 Nov 2026, 05:20 UTC≈9,780 views593 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

У ніч 11 листопада Сили оборони завдали удару по найбільшому порту Росії на Балтійському морі. Усть-Луга – найбільший морський порт Балтійського басейну Росії за вантажообігом. За підсумками 2025 року через нього було перевалено 130,5 млн тонн вантажів. Ключове значення порт має для експорту російських енергоресурсів. За перше півріччя 2026 року через Усть-Лугу було відвантажено 14 млн тонн сирої нафти, а також 4,5…

🔥460🎉69❤40👍18🆒4🍌1🫡1

11 Nov 2026, 02:07 UTC≈15,200 views789 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Морський порт Усть-Луги був атакований цієї ночі. На об’єкті триває пожежа.

🔥623👍85❤39🥰21🎉15🆒3🍌2👎1

10 Nov 2026, 17:53 UTC≈16,300 views872 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Внаглую через РБ, подумать могли б за такое?! 🥲

😁489🤣304🔥29👍25👏11🤬4🍌3❤2

10 Nov 2026, 15:24 UTC≈10,200 views920 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ShrikeNewsPhoto

Финита

😁473🤣356👏50❤15🍌8👍8💅3🤡3

Showing the 12 most recent of 307 posts we hold for @exile_plus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@exile_plus edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Exilenova+
@exilenova_plus · 324,293
24 posts
➔ ПВК "Паркер"
@captain_parker · 11,788
4 posts
Легіон Диванної Розвідки 🇺🇦🔱
@couch_iu · 30,930
4 posts
In Factum
@in_factum · 45,301
3 posts
Монова
@monovaolena · 33,641
3 posts
⚔️БРАТЧУК
@Bratchuk_Sergey · 155,210
2 posts
Kherson DRON
@Kherson_DRON · 20,180
2 posts
Шрайк Ньюс
@ShrikeNews · 97,757
2 posts
VD:Розвідка Ворога
@VictoryDrones · 37,978
2 posts
Женьок Вещає…
@ZhenyokSay · 157,836
2 posts
Абсолютно надійне джерело
@absolutely_reliable · 7,829
2 posts
✙ Мертва русня ✙
@mertvarysnya · 11,311
2 posts
PEKHNO🇺🇦
@pekhno_news · 68,249
2 posts
Тарас Григорович повідомляє
@tgp_news · 58,697
2 posts
Crimea News 🔱🇺🇦🇪🇺
@CrimeainnachatUA · 636
1 post
Dnipro Osint ⟨ Гарбуз ⟩
@DniproOfficial · 35,633
1 post
△✙#FOT✙△
@Free_Of_Tolerance_UA · 4,122
1 post
Liberty of Ukraine | Новини
@LibertyofUkraine · 35,637
1 post
World Front ♞
@MaYtioh · 334
1 post
ОSІNТ Varta
@OsintVarta · 7,820
1 post
🇺🇦ΔркΔ Русофобії Народів (сміхуйочки та допіздєржки)|#УкрТґ
@arkarusofobii · 2,801
1 post
Chibukhchyan live
@armenchibukhchyan · 13,179
1 post
BalaganOFF
@balaganoffnews · 13,629
1 post
Дмитро Чекалкин Новий телеграм-канал
@dmytro_chekalkyn · 19,442
1 post
DroneBomber✙
@dronebomber · 63,827
1 post
Дике Поле
@dyke_pole · 22,817
1 post
СВОБОДНЫЙ ЧЕЛОВЕК
@freeeman1 · 26,165
1 post
Ганущин (official)
@ganushchyn · 435
1 post
Грибник🇺🇦
@gribnik_ukr · 6,417
1 post
КіберБорошно | CyberBoroshno
@kiber_boroshno · 69,760
1 post
Марципановый Ликёр
@mar_liq · 39,614
1 post
ТРИВОГА Нікополь DNiPRO
@nikalert · 18,059
1 post
Nord Division
@norddivision11 · 45,241
1 post
OsintFlow ✙
@osintflow · 30,945
1 post
МАТЕРИАЛЫ ДЛЯ ЭФИРА
@radioeter · 2
1 post
✙Северодонецк | ЛХС 1934🇺🇦 #УкрТг
@severodonetsk1934 · 16,026
1 post
Типова Троєщина | Війна Україна 🇺🇦
@typicaltroeschina · 22,327
1 post
Ukraine Connected
@ukraine_connected · 4
1 post
Залізні котики
@zaliznikotyky · 122
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Exile+” (@exile_plus), 23,635 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/exile_plus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.