Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DANA channel

Channel

DANA channel

@DanaYarovayachannel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,766subscribers

-169 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001391588157
TypeChannel
Username@DanaYarovayachannel
Created5 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/DanaYarovayachannel

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,76611,08610,9266 August 202610 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net -169. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,718–11,134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 21:0410,766-3
9 Nov 2026, 10:1710,769-2
8 Nov 2026, 02:5810,771-3
7 Nov 2026, 00:5010,774-8
6 Nov 2026, 02:1710,782-3
5 Nov 2026, 01:4810,785-6
3 Nov 2026, 22:0610,791-12
2 Nov 2026, 19:4010,803-6
1 Nov 2026, 19:1010,809-6
31 Oct 2026, 21:5410,815-2
30 Oct 2026, 23:3510,817-6
29 Oct 2026, 21:4110,823-11
28 Oct 2026, 22:1710,834-5
27 Oct 2026, 22:1810,839-7
26 Oct 2026, 20:2610,846-8
25 Oct 2026, 00:4510,854-9
23 Oct 2026, 22:2710,863-9
22 Oct 2026, 22:4610,872-2
21 Oct 2026, 20:3010,874-10
20 Oct 2026, 13:5610,884first reading

Engagement

135 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.1%
avg views ÷ 10,766 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,130
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 135 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held135 (19 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total156,460
Reactions total10,041
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 21:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8,990
Videos
≈818
Links
≈3,230

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 11s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

32,914 reactions across 134 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9,20428.0%
❤8,63826.2%
😁5,38416.4%
😢4,53713.8%
🤬1,4824.50%
🤯1,1143.38%
🤔8782.67%
🔥7062.14%
🥰3591.09%
👏2820.857%
😱2020.614%
👎1280.389%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 135 of the 135 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33,490 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 135 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 50 posts held from the last 30 days (4.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,120 views140 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Це які ж маленькі чоловічі принади треба мати 🤣🤣🤣🤣

😁108👍23🤬6🔥3

10 Nov 2026, 07:39 UTC≈2,320 views253 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Вибачте 🤣

😁244🔥4👏3❤1😢1

10 Nov 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,990 views245 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Навіть не сумніваємось

👍146😢76🔥14🤔7😁2

10 Nov 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,910 views265 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Учора нічого не написала про обшуки у справі можливих розкрадань на будівництві захисту енергооб’єктів. Ну що я можу сказати? Господи, ми ж це кіно вже дивилися. Пшонка, Янукович, Межигір’я, страуси, золоті батони. Тепер у нас крокодил у пентхаусі. До речі, а чого ви до крокодила причепилися? Може, він там конкурентів знищував? Ми ж не знаємо всіх особливостей ведення бізнесу. Але є одна принципова різниця між тод…

👍217😢32❤11👏4😁1

9 Nov 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,880 views23 reactionsread 10 November 2026

https://send.monobank.ua/jar/3kgn5gHuU3

👍21❤2

9 Nov 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,850 views167 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤162🥰5

9 Nov 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,840 views132 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Подивіться на цих ведмедиків. А тепер на фотографію жінки, яка їх створила. Це літня жінка, яка дуже тяжко хворіє. Вона прикута до ліжка. Але навіть у такому стані продовжує робити добро. Власними руками вона шиє іграшки для українських дітей. Ці ведмедики приїхали до нас із Німеччини. Вони подолали сотні кілометрів, перетнули кордони, щоб потрапити до дітей наших загиблих, зниклих безвісти та полонених захисників.…

🥰81❤50🔥1

9 Nov 2026, 11:45 UTC≈1,740 views94 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤯77🤔13👏3🔥1

9 Nov 2026, 11:45 UTC≈2,020 views223 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Верховна Рада 252 голосами підтримала створення Космічних сил ЗСУ. Ну нарешті. З наземними силами ми ще не все вирішили, але галактика чекати не буде. Я вже приблизно уявляю, як це працюватиме. Головою Галактичної ради призначаємо Завітневича. Веніславський відповідатиме за юридичне обґрунтування застосування світлових мечів, Федієнко — за кібербезпеку Зірки Смерті, Арахамія — за перемовини з Палпатіном. Але голо…

😁147🤯35👍19❤9🔥7😱4👏1🤬1

9 Nov 2026, 10:41 UTC≈2,240 views283 reactionsread 10 November 2026

І про безкоштовний проїзд, як на мене нокдаун Віталій Кличко : Щодо нової ідеї центральної влади покращення для Києва. Маю на увазі «безкоштовний» проїзд. Президент доручив премʼєру і програму такого проїзду представити (а значить же, і знайти гроші на неї?), і знайти резерв автобусів. Почну з резерву. Автобуси, щоб додати, у Києва є. Водіїв немає! Може, їх, як і електриків, наловить поліція?.. Сьогодні (коли еле…

👍258🔥17👏8

9 Nov 2026, 10:33 UTC≈2,090 views115 reactionsread 10 November 2026

З коментарів : Це що в ходить СБУ збирає не на Дуку а на безкоштовний проїзд для киян? 😁

😁105👍10

9 Nov 2026, 08:07 UTC≈2,290 views259 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Процишин Богдан чорт 😈 Уряд запропонував Президенту залучити картель "Хімпром" до фінансування програми безкоштовного проїзду в наземному громадському транспорті Києва 😁

😁197👍25❤16👏8🤯6🔥4😢3

Showing the 12 most recent of 135 posts we hold for @DanaYarovayachannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Монова
@monovaolena · 33,648
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
🇺🇦 Софія Федина
@Sofiya_Fedyna · 23,633
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DANA channel” (@DanaYarovayachannel), 10,766 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DanaYarovayachannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.