Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Шрайк

Channel

Шрайк

@RomanShrike

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

42,255subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001277887027
TypeChannel
Username@RomanShrike
DescriptionМое мнение о происходящем Донат 👉 https://send.monobank.ua/jar/3ehE1mKCci Новости, которые мне кажутся интересными 👉 @ShrikeNews Всякая забавная фигня 👉 @TruthMinistry
Created18 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RomanShrike

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

46,700 average views per post against 42,255 subscribers — an engagement rate of 110.5%. Across the 8,376 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.02% and 20.9%, with a median of 10.5%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Posts measured19 of 20 published in the window (0 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled887,000
Mature posts only110.5% over 19 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers42,255 measured 18 September 2026
Cohortb31623:rus · 8,376 channels · p10 2.50% · p25 5.02% · p50 10.5% · p75 20.9% · p90 35.5%
Position in cohort99.857th percentile · 10.5× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.077% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 94.7% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

42,15842,35242,2556 August 2026 — 42,238 subscribers6 August 2026 — 42,227 subscribers7 August 2026 — 42,238 subscribers8 August 2026 — 42,225 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42,214 subscribers11 August 2026 — 42,213 subscribers12 August 2026 — 42,205 subscribers13 August 2026 — 42,215 subscribers15 August 2026 — 42,197 subscribers16 August 2026 — 42,193 subscribers17 August 2026 — 42,181 subscribers18 August 2026 — 42,187 subscribers19 August 2026 — 42,194 subscribers20 August 2026 — 42,193 subscribers21 August 2026 — 42,186 subscribers23 August 2026 — 42,177 subscribers24 August 2026 — 42,170 subscribers25 August 2026 — 42,162 subscribers26 August 2026 — 42,158 subscribers27 August 2026 — 42,193 subscribers28 August 2026 — 42,235 subscribers29 August 2026 — 42,232 subscribers30 August 2026 — 42,352 subscribers31 August 2026 — 42,350 subscribers1 September 2026 — 42,343 subscribers3 September 2026 — 42,340 subscribers4 September 2026 — 42,320 subscribers7 September 2026 — 42,294 subscribers10 September 2026 — 42,286 subscribers12 September 2026 — 42,265 subscribers14 September 2026 — 42,253 subscribers16 September 2026 — 42,246 subscribers18 September 2026 — 42,255 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,129–42,381 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 09:3942,255+9
16 Sept 2026, 00:5942,246-7
14 Sept 2026, 05:1942,253-12
12 Sept 2026, 16:2042,265-21
10 Sept 2026, 14:2142,286-8
7 Sept 2026, 13:1742,294-26
4 Sept 2026, 16:3642,320-20
3 Sept 2026, 02:0842,340-3
1 Sept 2026, 20:3442,343-7
31 Aug 2026, 19:2642,350-2
30 Aug 2026, 21:2742,352+120
29 Aug 2026, 20:1542,232-3
28 Aug 2026, 23:4342,235+42
27 Aug 2026, 21:4642,193+35
26 Aug 2026, 22:3642,158-4
25 Aug 2026, 21:5442,162-8
24 Aug 2026, 23:0942,170-7
23 Aug 2026, 09:0242,177-9
21 Aug 2026, 19:3542,186-7
20 Aug 2026, 16:5542,193first reading

Engagement

54 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
110.9%
avg views ÷ 42,255 subscribers
Avg views / post
46,800
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 54 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held54 (4 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total890,000
Reactions total45,783
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 02:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈513
Videos
≈88
Links
≈1,370

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

127,796 reactions across 50 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯43,39934.0%
😁21,80417.1%
👍21,75017.0%
❤8,8966.96%
👎4,3333.39%
🤣4,2673.34%
🔥4,0293.15%
🤔3,2372.53%
😢2,8092.20%
🙏2,3501.84%
🤷‍♂2,2831.79%
🙈2,1861.71%
🤬1,8221.43%
🌚1,6281.27%
🤡1,1290.883%
🦄7910.619%
👏2810.22%
🫡1990.156%
🤮1460.114%
💩1200.094%
5 further kinds3370.264%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128,368 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Sept 2026, 09:45 UTC≈15,200 views241 reactionsread 27 September 2026

🤝 Огромное спасибо всем, кто поддерживает мою Телеграм-деятельность с помощью донатов: Банка - https://send.monobank.ua/jar/3ehE1mKCci Карта - 5375411217472054 PayPal - [email protected] 👉 Напомню, что я веду и другие каналы: @ShrikeNews - новости, которые мне кажутся интересными @TruthMinistry - всякая забавная фигня Еще раз всем спасибо.

❤135👍70🤡12🌚8💩6👏5🤝2🦄2

22 Sept 2026, 10:56 UTC≈28,300 views2,284 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Пока продолжается блокирование Ормузского пролива, цены на нефть будут высокими. Пока цены будут высокими, у бюджета РФ будут "лишние" доходы. Пока у бюджета РФ будут лишние доходы, у Путина будут деньги на ведение войны. Поэтому, если Трамп хочет закончить войну в Украине, пусть для начала закончит войну с Ираном. Разблокирование Ормуза не гарантирует окончания войны в Украине. Но его блокирование гарантирует, ч…

💯1,900👍235🤷‍♂43😢33🤬27🦄16❤12🙏10

21 Sept 2026, 17:25 UTC≈30,200 views1,579 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Шрайк (16 июля): Федоров давал людям надежду. Насколько сильную, можно понять по реакции соцсетей и улицы. Федоров (21 сентября): Я президенту пояснював, що люди вийшли не за мене. Що всі втомилися, а зараз ви взяли і забрали надію. На цьому етапі вона була пов'язана зі мною. Шрайк: 🤔

😁781🤔261🌚260👍108🤡60❤44🤷‍♂36🦄17

21 Sept 2026, 08:40 UTC≈31,400 views2,195 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Нет ничего более унылого, бесполезного и бессмысленного, чем комментирование российских "выборов". Я знал, что рано или поздно мы перейдем и на эту дрянь.

😁1,300💯732👍53🤷‍♂34🤣33🌚16🤡14❤6

16 Sept 2026, 11:45 UTC≈50,000 views1,872 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Приближаются ноябрьские выборы в Конгресс США, а вместе с ними зачастили и комментарии про "импичмент Трампу". Ну а мне приходится снова напоминать очевидные вещи. Прежде всего - да, есть вероятность, что демократы получат большинство обеих палатах Конгресса. В Палате представителей у них шансы около 90%, а в Сенате - 50/50. И импичмент Трампу вполне вероятен. Но, блин, тут есть терминологическая путаница, котора…

😁810💯665👍212😢77❤46🌚25🦄17🤣10

15 Sept 2026, 07:50 UTC≈44,600 views2,953 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Нужно донести до Трампа простую мысль. Чем меньше у России дизеля, тем меньше по нему украинских ударов.

😁1,750💯899❤95👏77🤣52👍35🤡16🌚15

14 Sept 2026, 07:04 UTC≈44,800 views3,441 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Нужно сказать, что генеральные прокуроры у нас из страны еще не сбегали. Военнообязанные - толпами. Подозреваемые в преступлениях - сколько угодно. Даже один президент сбежал, не смог астанавиться. Но генпрокурор - это свежо. Раздвигает горизонты.

🤣2,020💯792🙈364😁97🌚49🤷‍♂38👍24🔥24

12 Sept 2026, 09:55 UTC≈52,300 views3,539 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Страдал фигней и мучил нейросеть, заставляя ее составлять топ самых возрастных российских/советских правителей, сдохших на своем посту. Топ-3 выглядит так: 1. Брежнев: 75 лет 10 месяцев 22 дня 2. Сталин: 74 года 2 месяца 15 дней 3. Черненко: 73 года 5 месяцев 14 дней Путин уже пережил Черненко, в октябре хуйлу всея воображаемой империи стукнет 74. При этом Сталина он может обогнать уже 23 декабря 2026 года. А …

😁2,530🔥381🙏252🤣167💯72👍56❤37🌚19

11 Sept 2026, 09:44 UTCviews —

Шрайк pinned «🤝 Огромное спасибо всем, кто поддерживает мою Телеграм-деятельность с помощью донатов: Банка - https://send.monobank.ua/jar/3ehE1mKCci Карта - 5375411217472054 PayPal - [email protected] 👉 Напомню, что я веду и другие каналы: @ShrikeNews - новости,…»

9 Sept 2026, 12:08 UTC≈52,900 views2,807 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Я вполне допускаю, что в феврале Путин задумывался о финише. Или хотя бы о переговорах всерьез, как инсайдили некоторые СМИ. Напомню, что в ноябре-феврале из-за санкций США и ЕС российская нефть ушла вниз и стоила 39-45 баксов. С такими ценами долго не повоюешь. Помешали два фактора: 1) желание Путина заполучить Донбасс полностью, 2) ебаная иранская война, задравшая цены на нефть к 100 баксам. По сути Биба и Боба …

💯1,920👍411😢192🤔110❤60🤬44🤡42🤣11

8 Sept 2026, 07:44 UTC≈44,900 views2,128 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Инсайдеры по итогам вояжа Уиткоффа и Кушнера ничем нас не удивили. Похоже, посланники Трампа прокатились по столицам с той же бумажкой, которая обсуждалась, когда трехсторонние переговоры еще были живы, внеся в нее разве что технические правки. То есть это просто попытка возродить забытую ебанину. Мотивация Трампа - повесить себе очередную самодельную медаль "За писдил" и начать бизнес с любимым. Мотивация Путина…

💯1,520👍382🤷‍♂110❤30😁24🤡20🙈15🌚14

6 Sept 2026, 08:05 UTC≈44,600 views664 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Результаты 84-го опроса "Сколько еще продлится война?" С прошлого месяца почти ничего не изменилось, так что и комментировать ничего не буду :)

👍362🤷‍♂184🤔35😢20🌚19🤡12🦄9❤8

Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @RomanShrike. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Sept 2026, 07:55 UTCAnonymous Poll13,900 voters approx.

Cколько еще продлится российско-украинская война?

  1. меньше месяца1%
  2. до 3 месяцев1%
  3. до 6 месяцев4%
  4. до года16%
  5. больше года59%
  6. сложно сказать18%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTCAnonymous Poll27,100 voters approx.

Cколько еще продлится российско-украинская война?

  1. меньше месяца1%
  2. до 3 месяцев1%
  3. до 6 месяцев4%
  4. до года15%
  5. больше года58%
  6. сложно сказать20%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Шрайк Ньюс
@ShrikeNews · 97,021
#1
YIGAL LEVIN
@yigal_levin · 219,033
#2
Юрій Богданов
@yb_ua · 26,487
#3
✙DeepState✙🇺🇦
@deepstateua · 760,108
#4
Алексей Копытько
@kopytkoav · 26,728
#5
Быть Или
@ToBeOr_Official · 303,514
#6
Zvиздец Мангусту
@zvizdecmanhustu · 68,310
#7
InformNapalm
@informnapalm · 131,350
#8
політ технолога ✙ ▵
@yaroslavivval · 25,118
#9
Маршал 🔥✊️🇺🇦
@marshalvdv · 95,839
#10
Монова
@monovaolena · 33,473
#11
✙ 🔼Вертикаль
@vert2026 · 117,714
#12
Юрий Романенко
@romanenko_dns · 53,438
#13
Погляд Приходька
@NazarPrykhodkoPlus · 22,099
#14
Paul Potseluev💅
@potseluiev · 4,091
#15
hromadske
@hromadske_ua · 103,852
#16
monitor
@war_monitor · 971,692
#17
Не Олексій
@notnets · 27,463
#18
Залізний нардеп
@yzheleznyak · 97,710
#19
Антон ШВЕЦЬ (Шуецький канал)
@readshvets · 22,005
#20
Денис Казанський
@kazansky2017 · 149,018
#21
Останній Капіталіст ✙
@OstanniyCapitalist · 118,320
#22
Лачен пише
@lachentyt · 1,552,688
#23
STERNENKO
@ssternenko · 882,036
#24
Бабель
@babel · 77,552
#25
Ю.Г. | Юрій Гудименко
@gudymenko_official · 38,810
#26
Бавовна
@ukrbavovna · 701,096
#27
Александр Коваленко
@zloyodessit · 82,229
#28
✙Resurgam✙
@resurgammmm · 55,369
#29
Повітряні Сили ЗС України / Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
@kpszsu · 905,765
#30
Babchenko
@babchenko77 · 80,587
#31
Мілітарний
@milinua · 72,836
#32
Boroshno News @
@BoroshnoNews · 18,120
#33
Березовый сок
@BerezaJuice · 144,096
#34
Tregubov's Purrple Chamber
@purrphyrogenit · 17,089
#35
Скринька Пандори
@pandoras_box_ua · 158,995
#36
БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС
@ButusovPlus · 348,142
#37
НЕВЗОРОВ
@nevzorovtv · 1,019,614
#38
MYROSHNYKOV
@myro_shnykov · 31,081
#39
Новинач
@novinach · 139,706
#40
Український Наступ | #УкрТг ∆
@ukrnastup · 136,116
#41
ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS
@Tsaplienko · 321,310
#42
Українська правда
@ukrpravda_news · 200,847
#43
Регіоналіті
@regionality · 99,369
#44
Irritable Orc
@IrritableOrcChannel · 8,041
#45
D7 NEWS | Демократична Сокира
@D7_channel · 35,242
#46
✙ Hardcore Conservative ✙
@hardcons · 12,716
#47
✙ Перша приватна мемарня
@privatnamemarnya · 115,804
#48
КіберБорошно | CyberBoroshno
@kiber_boroshno · 67,746
#49
FEDOROV
@zedigital · 216,374
#50
Телебачення Торонто
@torontotv · 112,045
#51
CYNIC
@cynic2020 · 20,149
#52
Євген Карась ✙
@karas_evgen · 163,514
#53
Бахмутський Демон 👹
@bahshiddemon · 171,886
#54
Война с Ордой. Сергей Ауслендер
@voinasordoy · 200,967
#55
Накипело. Майкл Наки
@Nackepelo · 212,531
#56
Цензор.НЕТ | Новини України та світу, війна та аналітика
@censor_net · 183,762
#57
MaksymZhorin
@MaksymZhorin · 4,349
#58
Roman Donik
@romandonik · 21,687
#59
Zelenskiy / Official
@v_zelenskiy_official · 670,140
#60
БлоGнот
@blognot · 13,001
#61
✙Над пропастью кринжи✙
@cringedepartment · 5,132
#62
Анатолій Штефан "Штірліц"
@a_shtirlitz · 138,200
#63
постіронічні політичні меми
@postironicpol · 58,287
#64
Wave function collapsed
@sofasignals · 6,992
#65
Головне управління розвідки МО України
@DIUkraine · 224,527
#66
МАДЯР🇺🇦
@robert_magyar · 603,010
#67
💥BEREZOVIEW (Taras Berezovets) WAR IN UKRAINE
@berezoview · 140,969
#68
addmeto
@addmeto · 71,835
#69
Шабунін
@VitaliyShabunin · 14,912
#70
Рецензии от Шрайка
@ShrikeReview · 8,111
#71
Валерій Залужний
@Zaluzhnui · 240,040
#72
КМДА – офіційний канал
@KyivCityOfficial · 400,465
#73
ҐРУНТ
@gruntmedia · 147,034
#74
Бро скинув мем
@bromeeems · 314,375
#75
Alpha Centauri | Космос
@alphacentaurichannel · 34,780
#76
Jalsomino - аудіохуліган
@mrjalsomino · 10,351
#77

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Шрайк Ньюс
@ShrikeNews · 97,021
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
Алексей Копытько
@kopytkoav · 26,728
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
Юрій Богданов
@yb_ua · 26,487
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
Монова
@monovaolena · 33,473
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
Не Олексій
@notnets · 27,463
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 September 2026
Zvиздец Мангусту
@zvizdecmanhustu · 68,310
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
Сито Сократа
@sytosokrata · 163,253
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
Roman Donik
@romandonik · 21,687
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 September 2026
Ю.Г. | Юрій Гудименко
@gudymenko_official · 38,810
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
Олександр Нотевський
@notevskyi · 26,076
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
Бізнес-Patriot
@BiznesPatriot · 21,086
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 24 September 2026
Sonya Koshkina (official)
@sonyakoshkina · 26,497
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 September 2026
Несемось!
@Katimsya · 29,879
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 September 2026
Armchair General UA ✙
@armchairgeneralUA · 41,826
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Будем всех бамбить!
@budem_bambit · 22,171
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
✙Resurgam✙
@resurgammmm · 55,369
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
Орестократія
@orestokratiia · 23,137
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
D7 NEWS | Демократична Сокира
@D7_channel · 35,242
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 2 September 2026
Податки фіз осіб та ФОП
@UAtaxesYou · 23,620
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
УП. Кляті питання
@ukr_pravda · 24,838
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 September 2026
ЗАКРИТА ЗОНА | Володимир АРʼЄВ
@zakrytazona · 41,331
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
Портников
@portnikov · 68,852
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Євген Магда/Переможний Магдіяж
@rozumaha · 23,333
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
Ціна держави
@costukraine · 37,580
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Domains linked from posts

One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

send.monobank.uaregistrable domain: monobank.ua1 post · 17 July 2026 – 17 July 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шрайк” (@RomanShrike), 42,255 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RomanShrike.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.