Мое мнение о происходящем
Донат 👉 https://send.monobank.ua/jar/3ehE1mKCci
Новости, которые мне кажутся интересными 👉 @ShrikeNews
Всякая забавная фигня 👉 @TruthMinistry
Created
18 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
46,700 average views per post against 42,255 subscribers — an engagement rate of 110.5%. Across the 8,376 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.02% and 20.9%, with a median of 10.5%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Posts measured
19 of 20 published in the window (0 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
887,000
Mature posts only
110.5% over 19 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,129–42,381 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 09:39
42,255
+9
16 Sept 2026, 00:59
42,246
-7
14 Sept 2026, 05:19
42,253
-12
12 Sept 2026, 16:20
42,265
-21
10 Sept 2026, 14:21
42,286
-8
7 Sept 2026, 13:17
42,294
-26
4 Sept 2026, 16:36
42,320
-20
3 Sept 2026, 02:08
42,340
-3
1 Sept 2026, 20:34
42,343
-7
31 Aug 2026, 19:26
42,350
-2
30 Aug 2026, 21:27
42,352
+120
29 Aug 2026, 20:15
42,232
-3
28 Aug 2026, 23:43
42,235
+42
27 Aug 2026, 21:46
42,193
+35
26 Aug 2026, 22:36
42,158
-4
25 Aug 2026, 21:54
42,162
-8
24 Aug 2026, 23:09
42,170
-7
23 Aug 2026, 09:02
42,177
-9
21 Aug 2026, 19:35
42,186
-7
20 Aug 2026, 16:55
42,193
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
110.9%
avg views ÷ 42,255 subscribers
Avg views / post
46,800
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
54 (4 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
890,000
Reactions total
45,783
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 02:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈513
Videos
≈88
Links
≈1,370
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
127,796 reactions across 50 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
43,399
34.0%
😁
21,804
17.1%
👍
21,750
17.0%
❤
8,896
6.96%
👎
4,333
3.39%
🤣
4,267
3.34%
🔥
4,029
3.15%
🤔
3,237
2.53%
😢
2,809
2.20%
🙏
2,350
1.84%
🤷♂
2,283
1.79%
🙈
2,186
1.71%
🤬
1,822
1.43%
🌚
1,628
1.27%
🤡
1,129
0.883%
🦄
791
0.619%
👏
281
0.22%
🫡
199
0.156%
🤮
146
0.114%
💩
120
0.094%
5 further kinds
337
0.264%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128,368 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤝 Огромное спасибо всем, кто поддерживает мою Телеграм-деятельность с помощью донатов:
Банка - https://send.monobank.ua/jar/3ehE1mKCci
Карта - 5375411217472054
PayPal - [email protected]
👉 Напомню, что я веду и другие каналы:
@ShrikeNews - новости, которые мне кажутся интересными
@TruthMinistry - всякая забавная фигня
Еще раз всем спасибо.
Пока продолжается блокирование Ормузского пролива, цены на нефть будут высокими.
Пока цены будут высокими, у бюджета РФ будут "лишние" доходы.
Пока у бюджета РФ будут лишние доходы, у Путина будут деньги на ведение войны.
Поэтому, если Трамп хочет закончить войну в Украине, пусть для начала закончит войну с Ираном.
Разблокирование Ормуза не гарантирует окончания войны в Украине. Но его блокирование гарантирует, ч…
Шрайк (16 июля): Федоров давал людям надежду. Насколько сильную, можно понять по реакции соцсетей и улицы.
Федоров (21 сентября): Я президенту пояснював, що люди вийшли не за мене. Що всі втомилися, а зараз ви взяли і забрали надію. На цьому етапі вона була пов'язана зі мною.
Шрайк: 🤔
Нет ничего более унылого, бесполезного и бессмысленного, чем комментирование российских "выборов". Я знал, что рано или поздно мы перейдем и на эту дрянь.
Приближаются ноябрьские выборы в Конгресс США, а вместе с ними зачастили и комментарии про "импичмент Трампу".
Ну а мне приходится снова напоминать очевидные вещи.
Прежде всего - да, есть вероятность, что демократы получат большинство обеих палатах Конгресса. В Палате представителей у них шансы около 90%, а в Сенате - 50/50.
И импичмент Трампу вполне вероятен.
Но, блин, тут есть терминологическая путаница, котора…
Нужно сказать, что генеральные прокуроры у нас из страны еще не сбегали.
Военнообязанные - толпами. Подозреваемые в преступлениях - сколько угодно. Даже один президент сбежал, не смог астанавиться.
Но генпрокурор - это свежо. Раздвигает горизонты.
Страдал фигней и мучил нейросеть, заставляя ее составлять топ самых возрастных российских/советских правителей, сдохших на своем посту.
Топ-3 выглядит так:
1. Брежнев: 75 лет 10 месяцев 22 дня
2. Сталин: 74 года 2 месяца 15 дней
3. Черненко: 73 года 5 месяцев 14 дней
Путин уже пережил Черненко, в октябре хуйлу всея воображаемой империи стукнет 74.
При этом Сталина он может обогнать уже 23 декабря 2026 года.
А …
Шрайк pinned «🤝 Огромное спасибо всем, кто поддерживает мою Телеграм-деятельность с помощью донатов: Банка - https://send.monobank.ua/jar/3ehE1mKCci Карта - 5375411217472054 PayPal - [email protected] 👉 Напомню, что я веду и другие каналы: @ShrikeNews - новости,…»
Я вполне допускаю, что в феврале Путин задумывался о финише. Или хотя бы о переговорах всерьез, как инсайдили некоторые СМИ.
Напомню, что в ноябре-феврале из-за санкций США и ЕС российская нефть ушла вниз и стоила 39-45 баксов. С такими ценами долго не повоюешь.
Помешали два фактора:
1) желание Путина заполучить Донбасс полностью,
2) ебаная иранская война, задравшая цены на нефть к 100 баксам.
По сути Биба и Боба …
Инсайдеры по итогам вояжа Уиткоффа и Кушнера ничем нас не удивили.
Похоже, посланники Трампа прокатились по столицам с той же бумажкой, которая обсуждалась, когда трехсторонние переговоры еще были живы, внеся в нее разве что технические правки.
То есть это просто попытка возродить забытую ебанину.
Мотивация Трампа - повесить себе очередную самодельную медаль "За писдил" и начать бизнес с любимым.
Мотивация Путина…
Результаты 84-го опроса "Сколько еще продлится война?"
С прошлого месяца почти ничего не изменилось, так что и комментировать ничего не буду :)
👍362🤷♂184🤔35😢20🌚19🤡12🦄9❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @RomanShrike. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Шрайк Ньюс @ShrikeNews · 97,021 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
Алексей Копытько @kopytkoav · 26,728 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
Юрій Богданов @yb_ua · 26,487 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
Монова @monovaolena · 33,473 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
Не Олексій @notnets · 27,463 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 September 2026
Zvиздец Мангусту @zvizdecmanhustu · 68,310 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
Сито Сократа @sytosokrata · 163,253 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
Roman Donik @romandonik · 21,687 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 September 2026
Ю.Г. | Юрій Гудименко @gudymenko_official · 38,810 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
Олександр Нотевський @notevskyi · 26,076 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
Бізнес-Patriot @BiznesPatriot · 21,086 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 24 September 2026
Sonya Koshkina (official) @sonyakoshkina · 26,497 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 September 2026
Несемось! @Katimsya · 29,879 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 September 2026
Armchair General UA ✙ @armchairgeneralUA · 41,826 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Будем всех бамбить! @budem_bambit · 22,171 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
✙Resurgam✙ @resurgammmm · 55,369 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
Орестократія @orestokratiia · 23,137 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
D7 NEWS | Демократична Сокира @D7_channel · 35,242 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 2 September 2026
Податки фіз осіб та ФОП @UAtaxesYou · 23,620 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
УП. Кляті питання @ukr_pravda · 24,838 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 September 2026
ЗАКРИТА ЗОНА | Володимир АРʼЄВ @zakrytazona · 41,331 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
Портников @portnikov · 68,852 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Євген Магда/Переможний Магдіяж @rozumaha · 23,333 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
Ціна держави @costukraine · 37,580 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шрайк” (@RomanShrike), 42,255 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RomanShrike.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.