Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 111 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @khartiia — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Views per post sit far above this size band
42,900 average views per post against 15,424 subscribers — an engagement rate of 278.0%. Across the 1,578 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,011–31,608 subscribers, posting mainly in Ukrainian — the middle half sit between 11.6% and 32.2%, with a median of 19.6%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
16 of 16 published in the window (0 exact, 16 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
686,000
Mature posts only
315.9% over 14 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source · err_high, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
63 measurements spanning 98 days, net +253. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,942–15,540 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 00:56
15,393
+2
10 Nov 2026, 03:04
15,391
-11
8 Nov 2026, 17:06
15,402
-9
7 Nov 2026, 12:09
15,411
-7
6 Nov 2026, 08:49
15,418
-6
5 Nov 2026, 06:40
15,424
-7
4 Nov 2026, 08:48
15,431
-13
2 Nov 2026, 11:57
15,444
-1
1 Nov 2026, 09:31
15,445
-14
31 Oct 2026, 08:19
15,459
-9
30 Oct 2026, 05:36
15,468
-3
29 Oct 2026, 04:08
15,471
+12
28 Oct 2026, 02:56
15,459
+15
27 Oct 2026, 01:38
15,444
+20
25 Oct 2026, 22:40
15,424
+16
24 Oct 2026, 19:21
15,408
+14
23 Oct 2026, 15:56
15,394
+42
22 Oct 2026, 19:01
15,352
+203
21 Oct 2026, 13:59
15,149
+82
20 Oct 2026, 11:57
15,067
first reading
Engagement
113 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
214.0%
avg views ÷ 15,393 subscribers
Avg views / post
32,900
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.248%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 113 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held
113 (29 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total
1,185,880
Reactions total
2,944
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Nov 2026, 07:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,360
Videos
≈1,150
Links
≈1,620
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
47m 51s
Average length
1m 07s
Measured directly from 43 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,694 reactions across 97 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,184
54.4%
🫡
1,693
22.0%
👍
1,071
13.9%
🔥
403
5.24%
❤🔥
313
4.07%
👏
30
0.39%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 113 of the 113 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,055 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 113 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 36 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Коли йому був 21 рік, він міг їхати за кордон – аби писати докторську роботу в найкращих університетах США, Німеччини та Австрії. Натомість він вирішив приєднатися до «Хартії».
Невдовзі друг «Математик» став євангелістом розвитку наземних роботів – нині він уже командир батальйону НРК у полку безпілотних систем «Лава» нашого корпусу.
Шукай сродну працю в підрозділах корпусу «Хартія» – на Lobby X!
Повну історію «Ма…
Наші амігос з країн Південної Америки з полку Р.У.Г пліч-о-пліч з українцями вибивали вopoгa з газогону на Куп’янщині під час операції «Велес».
Це добровольці з різних країн великого континенту, проте кожен з них в Україні відчув, що бореться за ідеї свободи й миру – як свого часу боролися проти поневолення і їхні земляки.
¡Gracias, amigos! Честь!
Заключна школа рекрута у 2026 році!
«Моя мотивація – зберегти нашу державність і зупинити ворога», – каже після вишколу учасниця «Школи Рекрута».
Дізнатися більше про практики нового українського війська ви можете за 3 дні на вишколі загальновійськової підготовки для цивільних від Хартія-Хабу та 2-го корпусу НГУ «Хартія».
Фінальний 3-денний вишкіл у 2026 році – Івано-Франківськ (20 – 22 листопада).
Вкладка: 1000 …
Другий відкритий чемпіонат корпусу «Хартія» з прикладної стрільби – це місце, де поєднуються досвід і готовність удосконалюватися.
«Цей захід уже став певною хартійською традицією. Це формування колективу однодумців, які знають, що таке зброя, вміють її застосовувати й готові довести свою майстерність не тільки на полі бою, а й на змаганнях», – каже заступник командира 2-го корпусу НГУ «Хартія» Володимир Лисюк.
Окр…
Бійці Р.У.Г звільняють українську землю. За кожною успішною місією години тренувань і щоденна робота.
На полігоні вчимося краще робити свою справу й покладатися одне на одного. Після занять сідаємо разом їсти. Говоримо про дім.
Серед нас є люди з Іспанії, Колумбії, Грузії та ще десятків країн. У кожного свій шлях до полку. Тепер у нас є спільна історія. І Україна для всіх нас - своя.
«Математик» – командир батальйону наземних роботизованих комплексів полку безпілотних систем «Лава» корпусу «Хартія». У 21-річному віці він мав можливість їхати за кордон, щоб писати докторську роботу в найкращих університетах США та Австрії. Натомість вирішив приєднатися до Сил оборони України, обравши «Хартію».
Після першого бойового досвіду в Серебрянському лісі та відбиття повторного наступу росіян на Харків він…
Війна наземних роботів здавалася далеким майбутнім ще кілька років тому. Нині ж – це реалії. І в цих реаліях технологічним лідером стали не США й не Китай, а Україна.
Видання .loyal Асоціації резервістів Федеральних збройних сил Німеччини поспілкувалося з українськими військовими діячами, які доклалися до розвитку наземних роботизованих комплексів. Половина з них – представники корпусу «Хартія».
НРК дозволяють не т…
У рідній Колумбії друг «Куербо» був шахтарем. На війні в Україні він також працював під землею – штурмував газогін на Куп’янщині.
Іноземні добровольці в складі полку Р.У.Г корпусу «Хартія» взяли участь у найскладніших етапах унікальної підземної операції «Велес» – саме вони першими зайшли в газову трубу та метр за метром витісняли з неї вopoгa.
Дивися повне відео – на YouTube-каналі «Хартії».
Ми поспілкувалися з к…
Шукаємо оператора БпЛА MAVIC у полк «Лава» корпусу «Хартія»!
Твоєю задачею буде повітряна розвідка й виконання завдань у взаємодії з іншими підрозділами.
Якщо ти швидко здобуваєш нові навички й готовий технічно обслуговувати БпЛА та інше робоче обладнання – долучайся! Досвід керування дронами не обов’язковий.
Телефонуй на 3333 й дізнавайся більше деталей про вакансію.
За що всі військові в Call of Duty могли б отримати догану? 🎮
Шкіпер, офіцер 1-го батальйону оперативного призначення Бригади «Рубіж», взявся за Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4, щоб перевірити, наскільки розробники взагалі розуміють, як виглядає справжня війна.
Сумнівна тактика, американці, які не вміють нормально вдягати каски, відсилки до росії та легендарний капітан Прайс, який ніяк не дослужиться до майора.
Усе…
«Для чого війську така жорстка дисципліна?» – питання, яке нерідко виникає в рекрутів і цивільних. Воно також відразу зникає, коли в екстремальній ситуації дисципліна порушується.
Головний сержант корпусу «Хартія» Дмитро «Волиняка» Грицюк завжди наголошує на важливості дисципліни. Адже від неї залежить не тільки успіх операцій, а й здоров'я та життя наших бійців.
Влучність – це години тренувань, контроль власних рухів і вміння зберігати холодну голову, коли час іде на секунди.
Показуємо моменти другого відкритого чемпіонату корпусу «Хартія» з прикладної стрільби, який провели разом із компанією «Балістика». Змагання дають змогу перевірити себе під тиском, побачити власні помилки й зрозуміти, над чим працювати далі.
На стрільбищі помилка коштує балів. У бою ціна значно вища.…
❤35👍12🫡5❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 113 posts we hold for @khartiia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Олександр Півненко | НГУ @Pivnenko_NGU · 18,545 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 6 September 2026
Десантно-штурмові війська ЗС України @ua_dshv · 35,158 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
24 ОМБр імені короля Данила @official24ombr · 21,252 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 September 2026
Сили безпілотних систем ЗС України @usf_army · 33,384 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 3 September 2026
СКЕЛЯ 425 @skala425 · 19,041 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 October 2026
✙Гострі Картузи✙ @gostrikartuzy · 25,104 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
△ 225 ОШП △ @OSHP_225 · 23,513 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
47 окрема механізована бригада «Маґура» @brygada47 · 52,761 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Оболєнський Ігор Георгійович(uk.wikipedia.org) “…Сирського і Командувача НГУ Олександра Півненка.{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/khartiia/3065 |title=Командування корпусу НГУ «Хартія» повідомляє про успішне…” read 1 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КОРПУС ХАРТІЯ” (@khartiia), 15,393 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khartiia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
