Все, что вы хотели знать обо мне и не боялись спросить)
По PR и по вопросам рекламы -
@Pr_kilogram
Регистрация в Роскомнадзоре:
https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673d929f9d804a279bc7dbd7®istryType=bloggersPermission
Created
28 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 50 days, net +1,600. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,238–38,858 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 11:41
38,222
-119
19 Sept 2026, 12:55
38,341
-49
17 Sept 2026, 01:40
38,390
-31
15 Sept 2026, 04:17
38,421
-37
13 Sept 2026, 14:21
38,458
-17
11 Sept 2026, 16:21
38,475
-81
8 Sept 2026, 23:59
38,556
+1,593
5 Sept 2026, 18:38
36,963
-36
3 Sept 2026, 14:55
36,999
+281
2 Sept 2026, 05:05
36,718
+138
1 Sept 2026, 06:03
36,580
-12
31 Aug 2026, 04:14
36,592
-21
30 Aug 2026, 05:27
36,613
-18
29 Aug 2026, 07:28
36,631
-21
28 Aug 2026, 04:04
36,652
+3
27 Aug 2026, 06:47
36,649
-18
26 Aug 2026, 03:26
36,667
-28
25 Aug 2026, 05:16
36,695
-12
24 Aug 2026, 02:49
36,707
-25
22 Aug 2026, 13:12
36,732
first reading
Engagement
134 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
44.4%
avg views ÷ 38,222 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,000
63 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.314%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
63
of 134 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held
134 (1 August 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total
1,069,750
Reactions total
3,362
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Oct 2026, 02:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,000
Videos
≈1,800
Links
≈583
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
36m 52s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 55 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,272 reactions across 134 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,454
61.2%
🔥
1,890
26.0%
👍
618
8.50%
😁
105
1.44%
👏
76
1.05%
🥰
58
0.798%
🤩
54
0.743%
😱
17
0.234%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 134 of the 134 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,272 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 134 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Отвечаю на ваши вопросы про макияж. Я всегда придерживаюсь принципа: чем естественнее будете выглядеть в макияже, тем лучше.
Начинаю всегда с умывалки, потом добавляю сыворотку. Не забываем, что все крема и сыворотки наносим по линиям Лангера. Если я чувствую, что моя кожа сухая, то я могу и ночным кремом днём пользоваться. Осенью очень актуальный лайфхак. В обычной жизни я чаще всего стараюсь не пользоваться тональ…
Предлагаю сегодня сразу запланировать вечер. Ведь сегодня старт нового сезона «Умнее всех»!
Телеканал «Пятница», 22:00. А мы, кстати, уже готовимся к новым съёмкам😜
Друзья, вы знаете, что я не так часто даю интервью. Отвечаю на вопросы и делюсь своими мыслями регулярно у себя в соцсетях, но с Алеко в его новом проекте «Мой монолог» мне захотелось поговорить отдельно.
И разговор, казалось бы, всего за час у нас получился обо всём на свете. Рассказала, почему сегодня для меня семья важнее карьеры, что такое маркетинг любви, где найти покой в наше турбулентное время, почему Пушкин…
Спортивное утро сегодня ещё и морозное. Но когда меня это останавливало?!
Наоборот: быстрее, выше, сильней — чтобы согреться. После такой тренировки энергии хватит на год🔥
Доброе утро, друзья!
Лёгкое напоминание: чашка кофе вместо полноценного завтрака даёт обманчивое чувство энергичности. Ничего лучше сбалансированного приёма пищи для организма нет😉
Кажется, в этом году наша зима будет проходить не под мелодию, исполненную на челесте. Я говорю про ту самую Hedwig's Theme, созданную Джоном Уильямсом для «Гарри Поттера». А челеста — это музыкальный инструмент, похожий на фортепиано, но звук у него как у музыкальной шкатулки.
И всё потому, что к сериалу по вселенной Гарри Поттера музыку будет создавать Ханс Циммер. И хотя его гений никто не может оспорить, он сам …
Если при словах «рыбий хвост» у вас появляется прямая ассоциация с рыбой и хвостом или домашним растением, то передозировка трендами вам не грозит. В этом году модники используют это словосочетание исключительно для своих причёсок.
Возбудителем моды стал выход Зендаи на премьере «Одиссеи». Думаю, следующий тренд будет на её ультракороткую причёску (спойлер - уже).
Нашла сразу туториал для обладательниц длинных воло…
Воскресный обед, простой, но такой душевный. Я, кстати, уже упоминала, что во всех квартирах или домах, где я жила, у меня стоял большой стол. Про мой 6-метровый стол в первой квартире постоянно спрашивали: это ж какое расточительство.
А я, знаете, с детства привыкла, что самое праздничное и душевное место — это как раз за столом, и не где-то в ресторане, а дома. Эту традицию я до сих пор продолжаю.
Джонни Депп всё ещё на коне — и это я не про ещё один фильм про пиратов. Хотя морская тема его явно не отпускает. Вышел первый трейлер «Вечного странника».
Депп сыграет загадочного мистера Келли, который окажется в самом центре разборок преступного синдиката — и всё это на круизном лайнере.
Ждете?
❤38🔥15
Showing the 12 most recent of 134 posts we hold for @TK_eat_pray_learn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Вебер Говорит @vebergovorit · 20,086 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 28 September 2026
Жанна Бадоева я @zhannabadoeva · 56,953 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Ляйсан Утяшева @utiashevaliasan · 85,188 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
Тина Канделаки @tikandelaki · 312,594 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Летучая Елена🌎 @letuchayaelena · 30,847 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
Разговоры с Ириной Муромцевой @ira_muromtseva · 57,285 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 August 2026
Бордовских @vitaminluv · 20,921 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 September 2026
Наталья Грэйс @nataliagrace · 33,339 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ешь. Смотри. Учись.” (@TK_eat_pray_learn), 38,222 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TK_eat_pray_learn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.