Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1,762. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 208,040–210,330 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 13:35
208,304
-259
13 Aug 2026, 05:38
208,563
-198
12 Aug 2026, 05:07
208,761
-213
11 Aug 2026, 01:42
208,974
-238
10 Aug 2026, 01:04
209,212
-216
9 Aug 2026, 02:35
209,428
-221
8 Aug 2026, 02:23
209,649
-191
7 Aug 2026, 02:48
209,840
-226
6 Aug 2026, 01:30
210,066
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:49
210,066
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
25
Videos
1
Links
26
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
8,520 reactions across 20 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
3,121
36.6%
❤
1,512
17.7%
🔥
1,314
15.4%
🤩
486
5.70%
😍
411
4.82%
🖕
325
3.81%
🎉
284
3.33%
❤🔥
158
1.85%
👏
140
1.64%
🥰
126
1.48%
💩
115
1.35%
🍾
98
1.15%
👎
87
1.02%
👌
63
0.739%
💅
45
0.528%
🦄
38
0.446%
😘
35
0.411%
🤗
32
0.376%
👀
31
0.364%
⚡
25
0.293%
5 further kinds
74
0.869%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,520reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2024 to 14 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
63
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
62
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thekiba. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 June 2024 to 14 August 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🧑🦯 I've just pushed out some cracking updates to TON Connect!
I've been up all week working on this, and I'm over the moon with the results. Telegram Mini Apps experience is about to become smoother than ever, across all your devices, once they update.
🤓 What's new?
• Added Telegram Browser support (yes, really!)
• Massively improved transitions between apps and wallets
• A few other clever tweaks to make yo…
❤️ TON has reached the milestone of 10,000,000 active wallets!
Such an amazing result is a natural stage in the development of such an active and vibrant community of enthusiasts brought together by Telegram.
I remind you that the blockchain plans to attract 500 million active users by 2028. What do you think, will it succeed?
🔍 What about TON? Well, everything's fine.
1. Our favorite blockchain continues to evolve, its performance has become even more stable, and its popularity among ordinary users is growing, including abroad. For example, Japan is preparing to add TON to the regulated stock markets, and in the Philippines it will be possible to pay social contributions to USDt in the TON network.
2. Guys from the TON Core wrote a new …
🥳 Saw that Coindesk article about TON and Polygon Layer 2? Pump the brakes, folks! TON Foundation's setting the record straight: they're not behind this move.
Turns out, some devs might be tinkering with TON-based L2 solutions, but it's not an official TON project. The TON's staying true to its roots with FunC, Tact and TVM.
🔍 Always dig deeper when crypto news drops.
🤩 Yo, check this out!
TON's daily active addresses are now crushing Ethereum's numbers!
Two years ago, Anatoly Makosov from TON Core dropped this gem:
Isn't it obvious to everyone that TON's gonna smoke Ethereum in active users? I wouldn't be shocked if it happens next year 😏
Looks like Solana might be next in line to feel the heat 😎
One of my followers sent me some crypto worth about 10 bucks. Overnight, that shit blew up 30 times! The guy then hit me up asking for it back, so I sent it over.
Talk about easy money — tokens just chilling in my wallet and boom, value through the roof! ☺️
👋 Hey everyone!
Recently, in partnership with Major, we have attracted a lot of international audience. And that’s why I’m thinking about switching to English for the channel.
As I want to keep sharing about TON and Telegram, this will help us reach more people and better engage with our growing international audience.
😏 What do you think?
❤️ Накидайте немного бустов плиз, хочу реакции поменять
👎87👍77❤37🖕30👀13
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thekiba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2024 to 14 August 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 214,747 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Fox’s Den” (@thekiba), 208,304 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thekiba.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.