Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1,176. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 109,938–111,466 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 22:57
110,114
-192
12 Aug 2026, 01:37
110,306
-211
11 Aug 2026, 02:41
110,517
-188
10 Aug 2026, 00:51
110,705
-152
9 Aug 2026, 04:11
110,857
-128
8 Aug 2026, 06:10
110,985
-109
7 Aug 2026, 03:54
111,094
-173
6 Aug 2026, 01:41
111,267
-23
6 Aug 2026, 01:32
111,290
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:01
111,290
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 25 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.732%
avg views ÷ 110,114 subscribers
Avg views / post
806
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
21 (25 April 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
4,030
Reactions total
32
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
688 reactions across 18 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
89
12.9%
🤬
73
10.6%
❤
69
10.0%
💩
62
9.01%
🙈
62
9.01%
👨💻
54
7.85%
😡
52
7.56%
🤡
42
6.10%
👾
41
5.96%
👍
33
4.80%
🔥
27
3.92%
🙉
26
3.78%
🤮
25
3.63%
👏
16
2.33%
💯
6
0.872%
🥰
4
0.581%
⚡
2
0.291%
✍
2
0.291%
💊
2
0.291%
👀
1
0.145%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 688reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 21 we hold a reading for · 43%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tradoor_io. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 April 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Tradoor v5 is coming soon...
Over the past few months, we have been rebuilding Tradoor from the inside out:
🔹 A rebrand, with a refreshed visual identity
🔹 A redesigned app and website with an improved UI/UX
🔹 A new CTO to lead the next stage of our technology and product development
These changes are part of a wider effort to build a stronger, more focused Tradoor, and create a better experience for our users. We…
If you bought a BTC options contract on July 1, 2024 expecting the price to rise, you could have walked away with a profit, or lost everything.
What made the difference? 🧐
Bitcoin started July 2024 at around $62.7k. Within the first week, it fell to around $53.7k before recovering later in the month.
📆 If you chose a 7-day duration
Your trade would have expired while Bitcoin was still trading near its lows. You w…
We regret to inform that the July Airdrip distribution will be delayed to August.
Tradoor is still working through its restructuring. We are not in a position to distribute until that process is complete and we have more stability on our end.
We understand if you are frustrated. That frustration is fair.
Thank you for staying with us through this, and we look forward to giving an update soon.
🐂Join Tradoor's comm…
⚠️ Telegram Link Notice
The t.me domain is currently blocked, so t.me links may not open in your browser.
You can still trade on Telegram here with this link:
👉 https://telegram.me/tradoor_io_bot
Trade on web: TON | BSC
We will share an update once t.me links are working again.
🐂Join Tradoor's community:
Trade | News | Chat | Twitter/X | Support
A falling market is still a moving market.
On Tradoor, you have two ways to profit when prices go down.
📉 Perps: go "Short"
You sell first, expecting the price to go down. You profit if it does.
📊 Options: buy a "Put"
A put option gives you the right to sell at a set price. If the market drops below that price, your put gains value. Your maximum loss is fixed from the start, exactly what you paid for the option, …
Crypto runs 24 hours a day. You do not have to.
On Tradoor perps, you have two core order types:
📊 Market order
Fills immediately at the current price.
📈 Limit order
You choose the price you want to buy or sell at. The order waits and fills automatically when the market reaches that price — even if you are offline.
Pair your limit order with a take profit and stop loss, and your trade runs on its own.
Take pro…
🎉 $GRAM Price Prediction Winner Announced 🎉
Congratulations to @promise_henry who won our $GRAM Price Prediction campaign!
⚡️ Important: Activate your Turbo Wallet
Turbo Credits can only be credited to your Turbo Wallet, so make sure it's activated before you trade.
If you need help, follow this guide.
📖 Learn more about Turbo Credits here
Thanks for celebrating this milestone with us, and here's to what comes …
💬 Myth: "Options are riskier than perps."
Strike price, expiry, premium... it sounds complicated, so it must be dangerous. Right? Not quite.
Perps:
- Your loss is only limited by how far the price moves against you
- You can be liquidated before you decide to exit
Options:
- You know your maximum loss before you start: exactly what you paid, nothing more
- Even if the price dips a lot, your option stays open unt…
It has been an honor to build on TON as it grew into one of the most active blockchains in the world. We are excited to see what GRAM becomes next!
To celebrate, we’re giving away $10 in Turbo Credits!
Predict the price $GRAM will be on 12PM UTC+8, 18 June 2026 and stand a chance to win.
How to enter:
- Drop your $GRAM price prediction in the comments below
- One entry per person
- The closest prediction wins
Cam…
Toncoin is being renamed to Gram!
⚠️ Please note trading with TON as collateral, and also the TON trading pair will be disabled for a few hours.
With the TON to GRAM rebrand underway, exchanges are temporarily delisting and relisting the token, which might cause some unstable price data for our markets.
Markets will reopen after a few hours automatically once price data is stable.
🐂Join Tradoor's community:
Trade…
A note on the June Airdrip.
This month's Airdrip distribution will be delayed. Tradoor is restructuring and investing in new growth channels — with new partners, new products, and new ecosystems — and we want to make sure everything is in order before we proceed.
We will have more to share on this soon. The Airdrip will resume in July with the third claim, and then the fourth and final claim in August.
We understa…
👍4❤3👀1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @tradoor_io. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 12,755 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@tradoor_io named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@promise_henry named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Domains linked from posts
4 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tradoor.io News - Trade Crypto With Leverage” (@tradoor_io), 110,114 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradoor_io.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
