Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TONX 💎

@TONXstudio

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

107,951subscribers

-677 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001884357376
TypeChannel
Username@TONXstudio
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TONXstudio

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

107,951108,628108,289.55 August 2026 — 108,628 subscribers6 August 2026 — 108,628 subscribers6 August 2026 — 108,574 subscribers7 August 2026 — 108,457 subscribers8 August 2026 — 108,367 subscribers9 August 2026 — 108,267 subscribers10 August 2026 — 108,161 subscribers11 August 2026 — 108,059 subscribers12 August 2026 — 107,951 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -677. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 107,849–108,730 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:04107,951-108
11 Aug 2026, 20:22108,059-102
10 Aug 2026, 18:14108,161-106
9 Aug 2026, 18:42108,267-100
8 Aug 2026, 16:04108,367-90
7 Aug 2026, 18:12108,457-117
6 Aug 2026, 15:27108,574-54
6 Aug 2026, 01:33108,628no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:01108,628first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 29s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

269 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥11843.9%
7829.0%
🤣176.32%
🏆93.35%
🍌72.60%
👍72.60%
😎72.60%
🤝72.60%
🕊51.86%
👀31.12%
🦄31.12%
😢20.743%
🤔20.743%
🥰20.743%
👏10.372%
💅10.372%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 269reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2025 to 31 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Oct 2025, 09:25 UTC≈2,360 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎙 168X EP1: Joseph Chee on Building Solana Company 🔥 “$SOL will hit $500 within six months and reach $1,000 in this cycle.” Today, we sat down with Joseph Chee, Executive Chairman of Solana Company (NASDAQ: HSDT), to unpack how he’s bringing together Pantera Capital, Summer Capital, and East–West institutional investors to build “Solana’s Berkshire Hathaway.” 🚀 Full episode drops soon. Don’t miss it. 🌐 168X is w

11🔥7🍌2🤔1

25 Sept 2025, 10:50 UTC≈2,650 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @kton_channelVideo

🌅 Introducing KTON Premium: Institutional-Grade TON Staking Solution The ultimate TON yield engine designed for institutional investors, fund managers, and Digital Asset Treasuries (DATs) holding Toncoin via vesting smart contracts. 💎 Officially certified by Telegram, TON Foundation, & TON Core 💎 Up to 4.2% APY (vs. ≈3.36% on other platforms) 💎 First to enable flexible reward withdrawals for vesting contract owners

10🔥6👏1

10 Sept 2025, 13:22 UTC≈2,300 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @kton_channelPhoto

Your Ultimate TON Yield Engine. The dawn is near. 🌅 #KTON #InstitutionalStaking — Website | MiniApp | X | Channel | Blog | Support | Global Community | RU | ZH

8🏆6

5 Sept 2025, 10:16 UTC≈2,180 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @kton_channelVideo

Golden Era of TON Staking. Launching soon. #KTON #InstitutionalStaking — Website | MiniApp | X | Channel | Blog | Support | Global Community | RU | ZH

🔥129👍6🥰2

2 Sept 2025, 11:45 UTC≈1,480 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @kton_channel

Posted without readable text

🔥31

2 Sept 2025, 11:45 UTC≈1,710 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @kton_ru

Posted without readable text

🔥4

22 Aug 2025, 17:54 UTC≈16,200 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥27🤣17🍌5🦄3💅1

22 Aug 2025, 09:08 UTC≈3,780 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚀 TON of Alpha EP3: Manny's Vision for TON & Satorica Full video out now ➡️https://x.com/TONofAlpha/status/1958595376883134799 Highlights: 💎 Manny's journey: Goldman → Kingsway → Bitcoin → TON 💎 Satorica thesis: Telegram = U.S., TON = dollar 💎 TON's edge: Telegram's billion users make it N-of-1 💎 Pavel Durov & team: The absolute GOATs 💎 $558M in 30 days: How 110 institutions went all-in 💎 TON treasury staking yield

🔥11🤝7🕊5🤔1

21 Aug 2025, 06:27 UTC≈3,190 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🚀 TON Strategy — the first and only TON Treasury — is now live on NASDAQ (VERB). The only way global equity investors get exposure to TON + Telegram at once. 💎 $TON is harder to buy than $BTC or $ETH. There’s no “second best” TON Treasury — and only one has an exclusive partnership with Telegram. 💎 Telegram’s roadmap? Plan A = $TON Plan B = $TON Plan C = $TON 💎 $1B → $10B → $100B. This playbook is just getting sta

🔥126😎6

19 Aug 2025, 03:23 UTC≈14,100 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎙 TON of Alpha EP3: Manny’s Vision for TON Strategy & Satorica (NASDAQ: VERB) 🔥 “Verb has just been transformed into the first and only TON treasury company — giving global equity investors a unique way to access TON.” We sat down with Manuel Stotz, Executive Chairman of TON Strategy Co., to unpack how he closed a $558M PIPE in just 30 days with over 110 institutions backing — and why no one can catch up to the fir

🔥98👀3🏆1😎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TONXstudio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 187,266 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

WEB3 TON DNS Media
@web3tondns · 158,100
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
CoLabs: coNFT, CoPump, CoPass
@co_nft · 153,714
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Programmer ♨️
@programmer · 190,905
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
Crypto Profit🛸
@Cr1pto_profit · 421,087
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
Solanapayouts.com
@SolanaPayouts · 191,303
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
Startups & Ventures
@tech · 2,462,734
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
CIQ LABEL - Крипта, Финансы, Торговля
@ciq_label_crypto · 404,599
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
Venture Capital
@venture · 2,433,810
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 August 2026
OOIA - TON NFT Marketplace
@ooiaton · 278,108
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
Du Rove’s Wall (RU)
@wall_jetton · 205,140
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
Crypto Insider
@coinmarket · 2,326,341
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
Everscale News
@everscale_news · 290,090
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
логово ромчика
@togetupblud · 210,393
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
TON News
@newston_en · 146,194
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
Trade Watcher
@stockbot · 2,404,709
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
KKX NEWS
@kkxnews · 150,351
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TONX 💎” (@TONXstudio), 107,951 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TONXstudio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.