Channel
@tu_crypto_news_en
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
708,570subscribers
-6,649 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002183174454 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tu_crypto_news_en |
| Description | 🚀 Stay on top of all major crypto news with the Traders Union team of leading journalists 💰 ➡️ For partnership: @tu_partnership ❗️Any information in this channel is not investment advice. |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tu_crypto_news_en |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
264 average views per post against 708,570 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.037%. Across the 1,134 registered channels in the same cohort — 316,245–999,955 subscribers — the middle half sit between 1.80% and 12.6%, with a median of 4.63%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 51 of 51 published in the window (51 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 13,486 |
| Mature posts only | 0.04% over 42 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 708,570 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b316228 · 1,134 channels · p10 0.563% · p25 1.80% · p50 4.63% · p75 12.6% · p90 26.1% |
| Position in cohort | 0.265th percentile · 1/125 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.041% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | English · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 708,570 | -1,492 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 710,062 | -1,457 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 711,519 | -1,703 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 713,222 | -671 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 713,893 | -1,227 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 715,120 | -99 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 715,219 | first reading |
51 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,486 |
| Reactions total | 90 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
90 reactions across 51 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 38 | 42.2% | |
| ❤ | 33 | 36.7% | |
| 🎉 | 11 | 12.2% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 4.44% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 3.33% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 1.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tu_crypto_news_en. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔥 BTC Awaits CPI Direction Bitcoin held above $64,000 today as traders watched U.S. CPI data and ETF flows. 📊 August spot Bitcoin ETFs still show about $714 million in net inflows despite slowing momentum. A softer inflation reading could give BTC its next push higher.
❤1
🚀 Dinaro joins MiCA register Dinaro became Slovenia’s first MiCA-registered stablecoin issuer in ESMA’s EMT database. 📊 The EU’s EMT register now lists 43 issuers, while licensed crypto service providers rose to 325. MiCA is expanding fast, but higher compliance costs may push smaller crypto firms toward consolidation.
❤1
🔥 Strategy maps Bitcoin credit risk Strategy launched a Bitcoin-linked credit dashboard to show BTC backing for its debt and preferred shares. 📊 The model assigns floor prices that show when each security loses full Bitcoin collateral coverage. A long Bitcoin slump could raise pressure on Strategy’s financing model.
👍2
🔥 Fidelity adds staking to FETH Fidelity plans staking and quarterly payouts for its $900 million Ethereum ETF, according to a new filing. 📊 FETH can stake up to 100% of its ETH, while keeping enough liquid assets for redemptions and expenses. Remaining staking income could become a new cash source for shareholders every quarter.
❤1
🔥 BoE tests Polygon for trade finance The Bank of England is testing Polygon in Phase 2 of its digital pound trade finance trial. 📊 The project uses simulated money to study stablecoins, SME payments, digital identity, and settlement. The trial could show how digital pounds and stablecoins work together in cross-border commerce.
👍3
🔥 Japan-Korea Digital Payments Link SBI Digital Practice and Nodeinfra launched Project Musubi to build a Japan-South Korea payment network on Canton. 📊 The first phase will use test yen and won tokens instead of stablecoins. Future rollout depends on regulation and could cut dollar reliance in cross-border settlements.
❤1
🔥 Bitwise trims staff in downturn Bitwise cut 14% of staff last week as the crypto market slump pressured the asset manager. 📊 Its flagship BITW fund assets dropped 31% in the first seven months of 2026. Bitwise still says digital assets are moving deeper into mainstream finance.
❤1🎉1
🔥 Ethereum nears a breakout ETH is holding near $1,850 as traders await a breakout ahead of U.S. CPI on August 12. 📊 Spot ETH ETFs logged a second day of outflows, while volatility fell to early June lows. A break below $1,850 or above $1,950 could quickly define Ethereum’s next major move.
👍2
🔥 Robinhood Chain hits transaction record Robinhood Chain averaged 11.6 million daily transactions last week as TVL climbed to $473 million. 📊 Daily active accounts rose just 3.3%, showing almost no real audience growth. Existing users appear to be driving the surge through heavier trading, not fresh demand.
👍2
🔥 Shipfinex targets $500M vessel tokenization Dubai-based Shipfinex partnered with ADI Chain to tokenize 35 vessels worth $500 million. 📊 The plan is still in pilot stage, and no maritime asset tokens have been issued yet. Tokenized real-world assets may reach $4 trillion by 2028, boosting interest in shipping finance.
❤2🔥1
🔥 Bitcoin Stays Stuck in Range Bitcoin is consolidating between $63,800 support and $65,400 resistance as Fed uncertainty clouds direction. 📊 U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw mixed flows, though the past five sessions still show net inflows. A sustained move above $65,000 may need stronger ETF demand to hold.
👍2
🔥 KuCoin adds resilience certification KuCoin received ISO 22301 certification for business continuity as resilience demands grow across crypto markets. 📊 The standard covers risk planning, service recovery, and maintaining critical operations during cyber or infrastructure disruptions. For 24/7 exchanges, resilience is becoming a core requirement, not just a compliance badge.
❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @tu_crypto_news_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 234,130 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 91 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TU Crypto News (EN)” (@tu_crypto_news_en), 708,570 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tu_crypto_news_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.