Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КОСАТКИНА

Channel

КОСАТКИНА

@kosatka_nika

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

30,786subscribers

-56 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001407452456
TypeChannel
Username@kosatka_nika
Descriptionистории людей, социальные проблемы реклама: [email protected] для обращений: https://t.me/kosatkina_bot поддержать канал: https://boosty.to/kosatkina/donate 16+ РКН: https://clck.ru/3H3LJV
Created20 May 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kosatka_nika

Growth

30,78630,84530,815.56 August 2026 — 30,842 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,842 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,845 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,830 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,822 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,825 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,819 subscribers13 August 2026 — 30,812 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,814 subscribers15 August 2026 — 30,803 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,786 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,777–30,854 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 09:4330,786-17
15 Aug 2026, 19:1830,803-11
14 Aug 2026, 11:1830,814+2
13 Aug 2026, 04:5630,812-7
12 Aug 2026, 05:1230,819-6
11 Aug 2026, 06:0830,825+3
8 Aug 2026, 23:5530,822-8
7 Aug 2026, 21:2730,830-15
6 Aug 2026, 23:2530,845+3
6 Aug 2026, 23:1530,842no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:0630,842first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.7%
avg views ÷ 30,786 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,400
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held12 (14 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total94,140
Reactions total3,660
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 01:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,640
Videos
333
Links
979

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 03s
Average length
1m 13s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,434 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,46038.2%
🤯1,40421.8%
😢1,11817.4%
🕊5288.21%
🤬4687.27%
👍1482.30%
🙏1452.25%
👏881.37%
🔥460.715%
😱290.451%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,434reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 12 we hold a reading for · 42%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kosatka_nika. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC≈7,380 views724 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

весь день мне сегодня звонит мама Алибека, вряд ли она хочет сказать, как ей понравился мой ролик Любовь (мама Вероники) тоже с утра получает звонки и досудебную претензию с требованием прекратить говорить на эту тему в СМИ

396🤬258😢70

14 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC≈8,560 views352 reactionsread 18 August 2026

⚡️Вероника Соколова была активной, веселой, творческой девушкой. Она познакомилась с риелтором и пошла с ним на свидание. Закончилось оно трагедией. https://youtu.be/4X2nGbc5Nxo?si=V0IhdaKeU3oL-mS8

😢265🔥4641

7 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC≈13,600 views560 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

новый эпизод сериала про закон о домашнем насилии в России в прошлой серии я рассказывала о конфликте Нины Останиной (председатель комитета Государственной Думы по защите семьи, КПРФ) и Ксении Горячевой (Новые люди). Останина тогда заявила, что из-за принятия закона о домашнем насилии будут распадаться семьи (о нет...), а потом поменяла свое мнение. Вчера появилась новость о том, что Останина провела встречу с Ксен

416🙏108👍36

3 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC≈14,600 views129 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Самое сложное при изучении английского не выучить все времена и таблицу неправильных глаголов. А преодолеть внутренний барьер и стеснение, которые возникают при общении с носителем. Хороший вариант, чтобы разговориться и перестать стесняться - ИИ-собеседник Chatty прямо в Telegram. С ним можно общаться текстом или записывать голосовые сообщения на абсолютно любые темы. Бот мгновенно распознает речь, аккуратно исправ

94👍23👏12

1 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC≈14,100 views989 reactions5 Starsread 18 August 2026
Photo

После выхода видео со мной связалась мама бывшего партнера Дианы. Она комментирует все, кроме главного - жестоких побоев, которые нанес Диане ее сын. И, разумеется, требует удалить интервью. Моя позиция непреклонна - нет ни одного поступка, которым можно было бы оправдать насилие. Адекватные люди разговаривают, расстаются, но не разбивают лицо своему партнеру. Осудить Диану, что не ушла сразу очень просто. Но помн

658🤯242👍89

31 Jul 2026, 16:32 UTC≈15,200 views401 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026

⚡️ Партнер регулярно избивал Диану, пил, лудоманил, выкрал ребенка и преследует ее Нужна помощь с оглаской, так как человек не наказан до сих пор. Диана честно рассказала, почему потерпевшим так трудно выйти из таких отношений и как помочь женщинам, которые находятся в абьюзе сейчас https://youtu.be/JDFaWhOOw9Q

🕊204😢13760

20 Jul 2026, 15:47 UTC≈20,700 views505 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

У меня вся лента забита Анастасией Брагиной - блогерша гуляла голой по Москве, в итоге ее задержали. Если вы, как и я, не знали, кто это, рассказываю. Анастасии Брагиной 22 года, она - бывшая участница Дома 2. В декабре 2025 она разругалась с родителями, стала жить на улице, ночевать в Бургер Кинге. Потом вроде бы жизнь наладилась, у нее появилось жилье. В начале июня она рассказала в телеграме как выпустила свою к

🤯38277😢46

16 Jul 2026, 18:16 UTC≈26,500 views636 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Рассказываю, что сегодня произошло. В Тиктоке завирусилось видео, в котором девушка рассказала, что подвергается систематическому насилию со стороны своих братьев. Софья ушла из дома и ей некуда идти - паспорт забрали родственники, в Москве государственные кризисные центры отказываются ее брать без пакета документов. Это правда огромная проблема! Чтобы заселиться в убежище (если там есть места), вам нужен не только

449🤯111👏76

16 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTC≈21,100 views313 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026

❗️В Москве кто-то знает кризисные центры для пострадавших от насилия, у которых квартиры (убежища) есть? раньше была у Насилию.Нет, но они закрылись в гос.учреждения не берут девушку, тк у нее нет паспорта если кто-то знает, напишите в комментарии или в бот: https://t.me/kosatkina_bot UPD: спасибо всем, кто откликнулся, нашли центр, готовый помочь!

😢22163😱29

15 Jul 2026, 16:26 UTC≈21,200 views912 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Ждули вышли на новый уровень... Ильназ Галявиев, расстрелявший людей в казанской гимназии, женился в колонии Черный дельфин. Его супругой стала 18-летняя журналистка из Москвы. Диана К. впервые увидела Галявиева на одном из судебных заседаний. Позже приехала к нему на свидание, после чего пара решила расписаться. Брак зарегистрировали в конце мая в ИК-6 в Соль-Илецке. Видеться супруги смогут только раз в год. В ма

🤯669🤬21033

15 Jul 2026, 08:29 UTC≈20,400 views540 reactions2 Starsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Какое-то удивительное волшебство произошло вчера с Ниной Останиной В июне депутат Новых Людей Ксения Горячева направила в правительство законопроект, предполагающий поправки в УК РФ. Она предлагает расширить действие статьи о побоях (статья 116) на случаи, когда насилие применяется к совершеннолетнему близкому человеку или родственнику, беременной женщине или лицу, находящемуся «в беспомощном состоянии либо в матери

🕊324139😢77

14 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC≈18,100 views373 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

«Ударился головой об асфальт». Российская блогер Анна Парамонова рассказала, что ее жениха - блогера Сергея Тимофеева приговорили к 5.5 годам лишения свободы. Ребята отмечали 8 марта в Минске. По словам Ани, они увидели двух явно пьяных парней без верхней одежды, которые стояли босиком на снегу. «Как любые адекватные люди, мы не могли пройти мимо. Подали им обувь, спросили, где их куртки, хотели вызвать им такси до

😢302🙏3734

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @kosatka_nika. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 408,974 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КОСАТКИНА” (@kosatka_nika), 30,786 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kosatka_nika.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.