Channel
@aminanewss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,877subscribers
-56 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001413670390 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aminanewss |
| Description | Про SMM, продвижение, блогинг и сотрудничество с брендами. Живу в Нью-Йорке, помогаю получать визы, делюсь мнением обо всем на свете реклама/сотрудничество📩: @marika1955 мой блог: instagram.com/amina.news |
| Created | 30 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aminanewss |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 22,877 | -9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 22,886 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 22,890 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:41 | 22,900 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 22,912 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 22,918 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 22,926 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 22,933 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 22,933 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
817 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 418 | 51.2% | |
| 🔥 | 202 | 24.7% | |
| 😢 | 78 | 9.55% | |
| 👍 | 53 | 6.49% | |
| 😱 | 23 | 2.82% | |
| 🤯 | 22 | 2.69% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 1.22% | |
| 😐 | 8 | 0.979% | |
| 😨 | 3 | 0.367% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 817reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Неожиданные новости: Международный олимпийский комитет снял ограничения с России. Теперь российские спортсмены смогут вернуться на международные соревнования и показать свои силы в индивидуальных и командных дисциплинах
❤136🔥76🤯22😐8👍5😨3🥰2
Пока Айгуль была в Москве мне пришла посылка от бренда TATİKA Я попросила её забрать, так как через Стамбул передать мне будет легче, но теперь она не хочет отдавать мне вещи, говорит таких удобных костюмов ещё не мерила если что вот ссылка https://www.instagram.com/tatika_store Советую приглянуться кто в поиске стильных и комфортных вещей
❤30👍7🥰3
У россиянки украли 18 тысяч долларов в турецком пятизвездочном отеле. Визовый агент и блогер Амина прилетела со своей семьей в Анталию на отдых в отель «Kempinski Antalya» летом 2025 года. До этого девушка продала свою квартиру в Батуми за 40 тысяч долларов, задекларировала и привезла деньги с собой в Турцию. По словам Амины, она не воспользовалась житейской мудростью и хранила деньги не в сейфе, но кто-то из родных…
❤155🔥92👍27😱23
меня разорвало на сравнении с затылком и от фразы «темнота - это не ничего, темнота это уже что-то» Жутковато
😢76❤7
Кайли Дженнер выпустила собственную коллекцию умных очков Meta 👀 Кайли участвовала в разработке дизайна. Очки умеют снимать фото и видео, отвечать на вопросы через ИИ, воспроизводить музыку и принимать звонки. внешне они выглядят намного более носибельно, чем большинство предыдущих «умных очков». Многие даже не поймут, что внутри камера и ИИ)) Хочу, но не знаю зачем))
🔥34❤24👍7😢2
Just a reminder
❤66👍7🥰5
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @aminanewss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,008,899 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дневник Аминема” (@aminanewss), 22,877 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aminanewss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.