Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for В глазах потемнело

Channel

В глазах потемнело

@vglazax

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

30,435subscribers

-45 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001184274822
TypeChannel
Username@vglazax
DescriptionТы не попадешь в рай за эту подписку
Created22 May 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vglazax

Growth

30,43530,48030,457.56 August 2026 — 30,480 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,480 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,477 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,472 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,467 subscribers9 August 2026 — 30,466 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,460 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,459 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,453 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,448 subscribers15 August 2026 — 30,442 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,435 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 11 days, net -45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,428–30,487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 09:3830,435-7
15 Aug 2026, 20:3630,442-6
14 Aug 2026, 10:2430,448-5
12 Aug 2026, 22:4530,453-6
11 Aug 2026, 23:0830,459-1
11 Aug 2026, 00:4830,460-6
9 Aug 2026, 23:3230,466-1
8 Aug 2026, 23:0130,467-5
8 Aug 2026, 01:0830,472-5
6 Aug 2026, 23:5830,477-3
6 Aug 2026, 19:0030,480no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:5230,480first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 12 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,940
Videos
877
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
55s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,792 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣3,91644.5%
😁2,37727.0%
custom 60326017183892144681,02411.6%
custom 60330719314087806887168.14%
🔥2272.58%
custom 61140311329304760122032.31%
💯1621.84%
🤡780.887%
💊340.387%
💩320.364%
👏220.25%
🤩10.011%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,792reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vglazax. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 April 2026 to 5 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Jul 2026, 20:27 UTC≈12,500 views552 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁245🤣231🔥70👏4💩2

27 Jun 2026, 19:05 UTC≈20,900 views565 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

ты, когда наконец созрел стать блогером

🤣388custom 611403113293047601282custom 603307193140878068865😁10🔥7💊5💯4💩3

8 Jun 2026, 19:11 UTC≈25,400 views605 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣321custom 6032601718389214468170custom 603307193140878068856😁52🔥5🤡1

28 May 2026, 16:36 UTC≈28,400 views309 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

ты и ситуация в мире

😁195custom 603260171838921446876💊14🤣11💯9👏4

28 May 2026, 15:52 UTC≈23,300 views484 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁218🤣187💯37🔥33👏9

24 May 2026, 18:28 UTC≈25,900 views490 reactions3 Starsread 17 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣400😁49🔥16🤡15💊7💯3

24 May 2026, 09:01 UTC≈20,600 views286 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁194🤡49🤣20💯12custom 60326017183892144686custom 60330719314087806883custom 61140311329304760122

12 May 2026, 18:28 UTC≈26,000 views442 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

его букеты

😁250🤣143💯30custom 603307193140878068813💊4🤡1🤩1

12 May 2026, 15:38 UTC≈20,900 views290 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁135🤣111custom 603260171838921446830🔥14

2 May 2026, 10:25 UTC≈28,700 views626 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣379custom 6033071931408780688143custom 603260171838921446859😁23🔥13custom 61140311329304760128🤡1

22 Apr 2026, 08:38 UTC≈30,100 views657 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁273🤣246custom 611403113293047601260custom 603307193140878068853🔥14💯7👏4

22 Apr 2026, 08:21 UTC≈23,100 views596 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣320custom 6032601718389214468158custom 603307193140878068862🔥23😁16🤡11custom 61140311329304760126

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @vglazax. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,017,960 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Maisto
@igormaisto · 103,839
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“В глазах потемнело” (@vglazax), 30,435 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vglazax.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.