Научный взгляд на привычное.
Обратная связь (там человек):
@ask_kamenschiki_bot
Консультации по силе воли:
@yakutenko_consult_bot
Рекламные предложения:
@Blossom_Agency_Tg
Номер канала в реестре РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a9b64770de7b4d761b4ced
Created
26 November 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,941–55,978 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 23:25
55,945
-5
13 Aug 2026, 18:16
55,950
-12
12 Aug 2026, 20:23
55,962
-8
11 Aug 2026, 23:31
55,970
-4
11 Aug 2026, 00:05
55,974
+1
9 Aug 2026, 22:21
55,973
+4
8 Aug 2026, 21:46
55,969
+10
7 Aug 2026, 21:55
55,959
+2
6 Aug 2026, 19:47
55,957
+10
6 Aug 2026, 01:45
55,947
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:11
55,947
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.8%
avg views ÷ 55,945 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,000
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
28 (8 July 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
255,340
Reactions total
6,404
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈326
Videos
≈4
Links
≈1,120
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
8,827 reactions across 26 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,312
26.2%
👍
1,911
21.6%
🔥
1,831
20.7%
😱
647
7.33%
😢
583
6.60%
🤯
225
2.55%
😭
176
1.99%
😁
132
1.50%
❤🔥
126
1.43%
🤔
124
1.40%
🐳
80
0.906%
🙈
79
0.895%
🤡
79
0.895%
👀
58
0.657%
🍓
45
0.51%
🙏
43
0.487%
💯
42
0.476%
💔
40
0.453%
✍
35
0.397%
🤝
32
0.363%
31 further kinds
227
2.57%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,946reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
3.57%
1 of 28 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
13,200
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
15,600
over 26 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFGaCVbw
1
8 July 2026
8 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Из Франции пришли новости, которые можно публиковать в условной рубрике «Веселый вестник апокалипсиса». Апокалипсиса, разумеется, климатического. Во французском Гравлине второй раз за год остановили АЭС из-за …нашествия медуз.
Как вы, конечно, знаете, значительная часть электричества во Франции – около 70% –вырабатывается на АЭС. Атомные станции – отличный способ получать электричество, не увеличивая выбросы в атмос…
Ну что, как и обещала, анонс стрима [1], который вместо среды пройдет сегодня, то есть в четверг 13 августа. И поговорим о теме, которая еще долго будет с нами, а именно дети и соцсети. Ну, точнее, дети и экраны.
Дети и подростки все больше времени сидят в телефонах и планшетах. Пытаясь бороться с этим, некоторые страны запрещают им соцсети. При этом в обществе все еще идут дискуссии, а действительно ли телефон или …
У нас началось! Да-да, я все знаю, что нельзя через стекло. Но это уже моё третье затмение (причем одно из них было полным), так что на свой страх и риск смотрю. Главное закоптить посильнее и долго не пялиться.
Тут у нас в Берлине в кои-то веки происходит что-то необычное, а именно глубокое солнечное затмение. Но оно будет вечером, уже перед самым заходом солнца. Поэтому провести стрим сегодня я не смогу. Вместо этого у меня сегодня вышло видео [1] по абсолютным температурным рекордам июня и июля в Западной Европе. Стрим же переносится на завтра, анонс я вывешу позже.
Ссылки:
[1] - https://youtu.be/xBGA_kzZukI?si=3tCXq-H7…
На канале "Факультатив" вышло интервью [1] со мной, где мы говорим на темы, которых на своем канале я касаюсь не так уж часто. А именно, обсуждаем вопросы власти, справедливости, демократии, тоталитаризма, капитализма, денег – но все с точки зрения биологии. Ну, потому что я биолог.
И теперь вопрос к вам, дорогие зрители и читатели моих каналов: интересно ли вам подобное? Если да, могу чаще затрагивать подобные темы…
Продолжение поста про рекордно жаркие июнь и июль
Затронуты оказались и реки. Наверное, все видели фотографии из космоса [3] с пересохшими руслами Дуная, Рейна и других европейских рек. Во многих из них прекращено или, как минимум, существенно затруднено судоходство. Баржи просто не могут пройти – либо потому что русло слишком узкое, либо потому что они садятся на мель, даже если не нагружены полностью.
Из-за нехват…
Нередко, если вам кажется, то вам не кажется. И если вы живете в Европе, и вам казалось, что что-то этим летом как-то немножко слишком жарко, то вы были абсолютно правы. Copernicus, европейская климатическая служба, опубликовала [1] итоговые данные: июнь и июль в Западной Европе поставили абсолютный температурный рекорд за всю историю наблюдений.
Средняя температура июня-июля составила 21,62°C, что на 2,79 градуса в…
Рубрика «Исследования, которых не должно было бы быть». На огромной когорте из двух с половиной миллионов детей было показано [1], что вакцинация от кори, паротита и краснухи, то есть вакциной MMR, не коррелирует с вероятностью развития аутизма.
Исследователи из США анализировали базу электронных медицинских карт Epic Cosmos за 2015-2024 годы и следили за прогнозами детей, получивших или не получивших первую дозу MM…
Продолжение поста про пользу ограничения белка
Если в этом месте вы начали паниковать и ругать фитнес-блогеров, совративших вас с пути долголетия своими россказнями о пользе белка, то подождите. Потому что у людей 65+ лет результаты оказались ровно противоположными, и высокобелковая диета в этой возрастной группе защищала их от преждевременной смерти, а дефицит белка, наоборот, приводил к потере мышц, истощению и пов…
В последние годы в фитнес и ЗОЖ-индустрии сложился непреложный консенсус: много белка – это хорошо. Куриная грудка, творог и протеиновые коктейли считаются базой здоровой диеты. Но несколько дней назад вышла статья [1], которая как будто полностью переворачивает это представление. Ее авторы изучили результаты более 350 работ, посвященных ограничению общего белка и отдельных аминокислот, и пришли к выводу, что уменьше…
Недавно я писала о работе [1], в которой ученые выяснили, что органический способ получать яйца заметно менее полезен для планеты и для самых кур(!), чем обычный. Пост вызвал ожесточенные споры, поэтому сегодня на внеочередном стриме [2] рассмотрим этот вопрос более детально.
Разберем научные исследования относительно органического и неорганического способа выращивания самых разных продуктов питания, которые сравнив…
Продолжение поста про вред органических яиц
Смертность среди органических кур также оказалась намного выше – при полном переходе Великобритании на органическое производство яиц на фермах ежегодно погибало бы примерно на миллион птиц больше, чем при нынешнем производстве с сочетанием разных систем.
Если вас удивляет, что свободно гуляющие куры умирают намного чаще кур в клетках, то зря. Куры на органическом содержани…
🔥310👍226❤88🤔57😢25😁21💯9🐳6
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @kamenschiki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@kamenschiki edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 205,780 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Заметки детского врача @DrButriy · 138,269 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Страдающее Средневековье @pophistory · 140,606 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
Людмила Петрановская @lpetranovskaya · 169,317 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
Екатерина Шульман @eschulmann · 306,448 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Якутенко, Ирина Игоревна(ru.wikipedia.org) “…каменщики»[https://t.me/s/kamenschiki Телеграм-канал «Безвольные каменщики»] (посвящён событиям науки и околонауки) и «Мозг на полную»[https://t.me/s/full_brains…” read 16 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Безвольные каменщики” (@kamenschiki), 55,945 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kamenschiki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.