Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Фёдор Крашенинников

Channel

Фёдор Крашенинников

@fyodork

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

13,256subscribers

-77 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001015049264
TypeChannel
Username@fyodork
DescriptionЧастный канал, где высказываются личные мнения. https://www.youtube.com/c/FedorKrasheninnikov Остальные соцсети https://linktr.ee/fedorkrasheninnikov Поддержка канала https://fedork.live/wall/effects https://www.patreon.com/fyodorrrrr
Created10 February 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/fyodork

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “ТЕЛЕГРАММЫ Ф.КРАШЕНИННИКОВА” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

13,25413,33313,293.513,2565 August 202610 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 97 days, net -77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,242–13,345 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 17:5813,256+2
9 Nov 2026, 05:1213,254-5
7 Nov 2026, 22:1713,259-6
6 Nov 2026, 18:2113,265-2
5 Nov 2026, 20:2913,267-3
4 Nov 2026, 20:4813,270-5
3 Nov 2026, 21:1513,275-1
2 Nov 2026, 21:5813,276+17
1 Nov 2026, 19:5613,259-4
31 Oct 2026, 19:5113,263-6
30 Oct 2026, 19:4813,269+1
29 Oct 2026, 21:2113,268-2
28 Oct 2026, 23:3013,270-5
27 Oct 2026, 23:4513,275+10
26 Oct 2026, 01:0013,265-4
25 Oct 2026, 03:1413,269-1
24 Oct 2026, 00:2113,270-5
22 Oct 2026, 06:2713,275-1
21 Oct 2026, 00:5713,276-6
20 Oct 2026, 01:1813,282first reading

Engagement

401 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.4%
avg views ÷ 13,256 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,560
89 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
89
of 401 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held401 (4 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total405,713
Reactions total8,838
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,120
Videos
≈506
Links
≈13,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 59m
Average length
59m 53s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

38,646 reactions across 380 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯19,52250.5%
🤷‍♂6,46016.7%
👍3,8239.89%
❤2,8967.49%
👎2,2445.81%
😭1,6194.19%
🤝6881.78%
💔6131.59%
👏5581.44%
🙏2230.577%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 401 of the 401 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40,620 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 401 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 401 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fyodork. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 401 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 16 of 89 posts held from the last 30 days (18.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 07:44 UTC553 views22 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Сегодня вечером https://www.youtube.com/live/FUmL6cckmGE?si=t1FX_v28DJt0UMVx

🤝10❤7👍3👎1👏1

11 Nov 2026, 12:56 UTC≈3,270 views52 reactionsread 12 November 2026

А также интересный профайл Стивена Миллера с точки зрения его отношения к Украине (если кратко, то это очень плохой вариант) https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/rus/articles/2026/11/10/7249707/

👍17💯12😭9🤷‍♂6👎5❤3

11 Nov 2026, 12:52 UTC≈3,340 views92 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Ну что, было бы круто https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/news/2026/11/11/8062326/

🙏59🤷‍♂16💯12👎5

11 Nov 2026, 12:50 UTC≈3,290 views93 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Обыкновенный путинизм https://t.me/mediazzzona/35013

💯45😭34🤷‍♂10❤2👎1🙏1

11 Nov 2026, 11:52 UTC≈3,090 views120 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

ООН потребовала освободить адвокатов Алексея Навального. Организация признала их заключение незаконным Адвокаты Алексея Навального Вадим Кобзев и Алексей Липцер находятся в российских колониях в нарушение международного права. К такому выводу пришла рабочая группа ООН по произвольным задержаниям. Организация потребовала немедленно освободить адвокатов, выплатить им компенсации и расследовать обстоятельства их пресле…

👍78❤30🤷‍♂8😭3👎1

10 Nov 2026, 17:36 UTC≈4,110 views46 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Иван Лукич против Марины Ивановны🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️

🤷‍♂34🤝6💯4👎2

10 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC≈4,220 views71 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Ну посмотрим https://t.me/tvrain/114087

🤷‍♂34🙏20👎6❤5💯4🤝2

10 Nov 2026, 15:28 UTC≈4,230 views92 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Особенно они должны сейчас, когда без них договариваются. И уж тем более должны будут все профинансировать, когда договорятся. Потому что от Путина, конечно же, никаких репараций на восстановление Украины не будет, а если будут, то символические. А все остальное - Мерц соберет и пришлет, тем более что он готов https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/rus/news/2026/11/10/7249701/

🤷‍♂49💯26👎9🤝7👏1

10 Nov 2026, 15:23 UTC≈4,120 views89 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Недавно тут писал, что дальше публиковать агитки на тему "Европе никак не повредил отказ от российского газа и даже наоборот" могут только совершенно оторванные от реальности люди https://t.me/bxlkapusta/5583

💯50🤷‍♂22😭7👎6❤3👍1

10 Nov 2026, 12:51 UTC≈4,300 views102 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Ну то, что переговоры продолжаются, уже хороший знак. Значит обошлось без театральных жестов https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/news/2026/11/10/8062135/

👍40💯20🤷‍♂18🙏9❤8👎7

10 Nov 2026, 12:02 UTC≈4,330 views106 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Какая-то тупая идея, а еще можно переименовать какую-нибудь деревню в Вашингтон и разрешить Путину называться "покорителем Вашингтона" https://t.me/dwglavnoe/70445

💯65🤷‍♂22❤9👍5🤝3👎2

10 Nov 2026, 10:19 UTC≈4,490 views134 reactionsread 12 November 2026

👆️️️️👆️️️️Москвичам, конечно, виднее, что там случилось с Китай-городом, но есть и такая версия: тусовка там была всегда, но раньше заведения были подороже и привлекали публику почище. А в силу некоторых причин слой платежеспособных клиентов истончился, заведения стали ориентироваться на малоденежную публику, что в итоге привело к качественному изменению ситуации. Ну а что вы хотели? Война это обнищание, и то что жит…

💯86👎23🤷‍♂18🤝3👍2❤1👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 401 posts we hold for @fyodork. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бедный Рюрик
@akalitin · 30,347
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Пархомбюро
@sparkhomenkovoice · 28,298
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
ПЕВЧИХ
@mariapevchikh · 22,558
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
Как бы Mikhail Vinogradov
@Vinogradov74 · 28,217
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 September 2026
Таня Ф.
@tanya_f · 20,938
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 September 2026
Тихон Дзядко
@tdzyadko · 19,602
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 September 2026
Leonid Volkov
@leonid_volkov · 21,845
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
Жданов
@ioannZH · 20,395
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 September 2026
Boris Pastukhov
@b_pastukhov · 24,657
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
Antony Nut
@orex62 · 50,461
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Милов. Команда
@team_milov · 31,175
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 September 2026
The Moscow Times. Мнения
@moscowtimes_opinion · 21,001
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
DW Главное
@dwglavnoe · 83,997
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Faridaily
@faridaily24 · 62,324
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
the True Story
@truestorymedia · 20,691
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 September 2026
Kynev
@alexander_kynev · 19,480
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 September 2026
Колезев ☮️
@kolezev · 59,151
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
Аббас Галлямов
@abbasgallyamovpolitics · 85,082
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
ЗАХАРОВ
@zakharovchannel · 29,805
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
PLUSHEV/ПЛЮЩЕВ
@PlushevChannel · 97,937
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
ШЕПЕЛИН
@ilyashepelin · 44,968
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Навальный LIVE
@navalnylivechannel · 40,009
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
Глобальный кризис
@global_crysis · 21,264
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
Andrey Malgin
@AndreyMalginItalia · 18,602
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 October 2026

This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q62168436 on Wikidata, read 8 November 2026
LabelFyodor Krasheninnikov
X / Twitter@Fyodorrrrr
YouTubeUChYIg_gQgb4wyJIh1-oVo-w

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фёдор Крашенинников” (@fyodork), 13,256 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fyodork.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.