Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ЭХО FM

@echofm_online

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

39,654subscribers

-53 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001855422100
TypeChannel
Username@echofm_online
DescriptionСтатьи, расшифровки эфиров, мнения о происходящем в мире. Для связи: @echocontact_bot
Created28 September 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/echofm_online

Growth

39,65439,70739,680.55 August 2026 — 39,707 subscribers6 August 2026 — 39,707 subscribers6 August 2026 — 39,700 subscribers7 August 2026 — 39,694 subscribers8 August 2026 — 39,681 subscribers9 August 2026 — 39,665 subscribers10 August 2026 — 39,656 subscribers11 August 2026 — 39,663 subscribers12 August 2026 — 39,654 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,646–39,715 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:2739,654-9
11 Aug 2026, 10:5339,663+7
10 Aug 2026, 12:5439,656-9
9 Aug 2026, 15:2139,665-16
8 Aug 2026, 18:0039,681-13
7 Aug 2026, 15:5339,694-6
6 Aug 2026, 15:4639,700-7
6 Aug 2026, 01:4839,707no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:1539,707first reading

Engagement

111 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.8%
avg views ÷ 39,654 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,060
111 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
111
of 111 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held111 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total561,950
Reactions total9,534
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
22,700
Videos
4,610
Links
21,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
15m 24s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,485 reactions across 91 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,52620.4%
👍1,24416.6%
💯1,05414.1%
🤮6158.22%
😢3775.04%
🤡3684.92%
😁3604.81%
💩2693.59%
🤬2012.69%
🤔1902.54%
🔥1862.48%
💔1401.87%
🕊1231.64%
💊1051.40%
👏991.32%
👎851.14%
👀841.12%
🥱610.815%
🥴590.788%
🙏570.762%
28 further kinds2823.77%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 111 of the 111 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,534reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 111 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC≈3,550 views81 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сняв партию «Яблоко» с выборов, Владимир Путин продемонстрировал неуверенность в себе, считает журналист Михаил Фишман «Невозможно себе представить вычёркивание "Яблока" из утвержденного и публично представленного Путину бюллетеня без его личной санкции. Такого просто не может быть. Это значит только одно: в промежутке между четвергом и понедельником кто-то дошел до Путина и убедил его, что "Яблоко" надо снять. Как

💯5610🤡7👍4💊3👏1

12 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC≈3,910 views129 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

«Русские, это могилы. Здесь ваши соотечественники, либо вы сами творили геноцид» — музыкант Максим Покровский побывал в Изюме «Это место массового захоронения 449 мирных жителей, которых уничтожили, убили. Многих из них перед этим пытали. То же самое делали в Буче», — сказал лидер группы «Ногу свело!» Видео: Nogu Svelo / Facebook

💔73😢2215🖕9😱7💊21

12 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC≈3,920 views118 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

12 августа 2000 года затонула атомная подводная лодка К-141 «Курск». Погибли 118 членов экипажа. Писатель Виктор Шендерович: «Вдруг вспомнил, как через пару недель после трагедии, когда стало окончательно ясно, что Путин лгал и прямо виновен в гибели моряков, после его фразы про "блядей за десять долларов" в адрес вдов… — несколько моих влиятельных либеральных знакомцев убеждали меня в том, что Путину теперь конец и

😢8314❤‍🔥9💔6💯4👍2

12 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC≈4,150 views93 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Партию «Яблоко» сняли с выборов, так как за нее могли проголосовать пару миллионов человек — историк Юрий Пивоваров Сторонники партии «Яблоко» показали, что есть другая Россия, считает Юрий Пивоваров: «Ещё Россия не сгинула, ещё есть люди, которые понимают, кто есть кто и что есть что». Видео: Прямо сейчас / «Эхо»

👍62💯12🕊9🤔8💊1💩1

12 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈4,290 views84 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

«Тоталитарное затмение» — карикатура дня Автор: Ruben L. Oppenheimer 🇳🇱

👍42😁21🔥133👎2🤡2💯1

12 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC≈4,270 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Политик Владимир Кара-Мурза и врач Андрей Волна вступили в дискуссию о методах сопротивления Владимир Кара-Мурза заявил, что участники стихийного митинга в поддержку партии «Яблоко» 10 августа, «молодые ребята и девушки, которые пели, скандировали, смеялись в лицо ментам» — это «завтрашний день России». Андрей Волна: «Мы проиграли свою страну. Свою жизнь, там, в России, мы проиграли. Веря в силу ненасильственного

53🤔10👍9💔4🤷‍♀3🖕2🥱2🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC≈4,720 views189 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

В Новосибирске силовики заставили встречавших Путина людей спуститься в кювет Между сотрудником полиции и местными жителями произошёл диалог: — Вы же взрослые люди! Ну увидите вы его машину, что из этого? — Вдруг помашет — Человек думает о России, ему некогда в окно смотреть

🤮121🤡36🤣13🤯74🤬4🍌31

12 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC≈17,700 views190 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Журналист Ксения Ларина — об отношении «товарищей агитаторов» к людям: «Как же нужно не уважать людей, чтобы сначала призывать их голосовать за единственную антивоенную партию, а теперь — за любую провоенную партию? Хочу сказать, что эта тактика ничем не отличается от тактики Кремля: люди для них как пешки, безмозглые пешки. Я с трудом себе представляю человека, который вчера выходил к Верховному суду в защиту "Яб

💯112👎35👍17🤡107💩5🤣4

12 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC≈4,860 views108 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Запрос на мир есть даже в z-сообществе, заметил журналист Иван Филиппов «Официальная пропаганда, да и z-пропаганда пытаются убедить нас в том, что у российского общества нет запроса на остановку войны. Что "партию позорного мира «Яблоко» поддерживает максимум 2% россиян". В этом, кстати, с пропагандой российской солидарна пропаганда украинская. Но это не так. Запрос на мир в обществе огромный, и проявляется он в сам

👍65😁1912💯8💩3😱1

12 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC≈5,070 views130 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Путин снял «Яблоко» c выборов, чтобы сделать вид, что россияне хотят войны, и провести мобилизацию — Зеленский «Путин после так называемых выборов планирует мобилизацию нескольких сотен тысяч россиян до конца года», — сказал президент Украины Владимир Зеленский в своём видеообращении. Видео: Zelenskiy Official / Telegram

💯69💔339🤡9💊6💩2🕊2

12 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC≈5,040 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Задайте вопрос Юрию Пивоварову На некоторые из них историк и политолог ответит сегодня в прямом эфире в 14:00 по московскому времени на YouTube-канале «Эхо». Оставляйте вопросы под этим постом. Смотрите программу «Прямо сейчас» в 14:00 по московскому времени на YouTube, слушайте на сайте или в приложении «Эха».

23👍13🕊3💩2

12 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC≈4,910 views208 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Журналистка Анна Наринская — о реакции на поддержавшую партию «Яблоко» молодёжь: «Абсолютно вымораживает, другого слова не подберу, реакция злобы и насмешки по отношению к молодым людям, вышедшим к Верховному суду в Москве протестовать против того, что "Яблоко" сняли с выборов. Ах они такие-сякие вышли с триколором поганым за бессмысленную партию и рисовали слабацкие пацифики. И вообще чего это они не уехали. Пора

💯12855🕊14👍5💩41😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 111 posts we hold for @echofm_online. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@echofm_online edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz2,060 voters approx.

Куда попросила доступ у правительства «Российская газета»?

  1. Во «внешний интернет»56%
  2. В правительство4%
  3. В «зону проведения СВО»8%
  4. В правительственные бомбоубежища31%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 111 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 57,727 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

aavst2022
@aavst2022 · 177,308
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Новая газета
@novaya_pishet · 200,332
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 August 2026
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 306,640
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Медиазона
@mediazzzona · 165,881
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Vladimir Pastukhov
@v_pastukhov · 153,971
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Дождь | Новости
@tvrain · 442,048
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Михаил Ходорковский
@khodorkovski · 155,666
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
BBC News | Русская служба
@bbcrussian · 388,515
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q114398988 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelEcho
DescriptionRussian-language online media
X / Twitter@echofm_online
YouTubeUCeRgg1LlhMyGRFwaniNyDeA
Official sitehttps://echofm.online

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Эхо (интернет-издание) (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…социальные сети и мобильные приложения издания{{Cite web|lang=ru|url=https://t.me/echofm_online/4|title=ЭХО|website=[[Telegram]]|date=2022-10-02|publisher…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЭХО FM” (@echofm_online), 39,654 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/echofm_online.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.