Единственный официальный Telegram-канал проекта «И Грянул Грэм». Здесь вы первыми узнаете важные и актуальные новости, увидите анонсы наших стримов, а также интервью с гостями передачи в записи.
YouTube: youtube.com/channel/UCCV5Z2DEYnUGIY_mO-AcQKw
Created
12 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 376 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
326 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net +1,097. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 112,945–114,774 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 08:57
114,563
+714
19 Sept 2026, 12:36
113,849
+314
17 Sept 2026, 01:57
113,535
+22
15 Sept 2026, 05:01
113,513
-7
13 Sept 2026, 16:58
113,520
-6
11 Sept 2026, 18:38
113,526
+59
9 Sept 2026, 07:58
113,467
-9
6 Sept 2026, 03:16
113,476
+131
3 Sept 2026, 20:02
113,345
+189
2 Sept 2026, 09:34
113,156
-5
1 Sept 2026, 08:29
113,161
-17
31 Aug 2026, 05:03
113,178
-28
30 Aug 2026, 08:15
113,206
-24
29 Aug 2026, 05:24
113,230
-11
28 Aug 2026, 08:05
113,241
-2
27 Aug 2026, 07:04
113,243
-5
26 Aug 2026, 03:26
113,248
-5
25 Aug 2026, 05:43
113,253
-26
24 Aug 2026, 04:42
113,279
-33
22 Aug 2026, 12:42
113,312
first reading
Engagement
1,595 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 114,563 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,800
940 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
941
of 1,595 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
1,595 (5 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
14,822,814
Reactions total
328,461
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 23:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈29,900
Videos
≈16,500
Links
≈32,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 36m
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 139 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
349,967 reactions across 997 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
70,827
20.2%
🤡
61,438
17.6%
👍
34,660
9.90%
❤
33,627
9.61%
🔥
23,246
6.64%
💊
21,365
6.10%
👏
15,035
4.30%
🤔
14,826
4.24%
😢
14,673
4.19%
🤣
14,025
4.01%
🙏
9,088
2.60%
😁
7,857
2.25%
💯
6,449
1.84%
😱
4,123
1.18%
🤷♂
3,655
1.04%
🥱
3,554
1.02%
🕊
2,383
0.681%
🤪
2,137
0.611%
🤯
2,108
0.602%
👀
1,793
0.512%
8 further kinds
3,098
0.885%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 999 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 349,967 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
122
across the posts below
Posts paid on
49
of 999 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
52
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gremtelegram. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.3%
3 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
16,400
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
16,000
over 996 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Путин отрицает: как его заявления о возможном конфликте с Европой отличаются от его слов о войне с Украиной в 2021-2022 годах
В пятницу Владимир Путин снова заявил об отсутствии у России планов нападения на страны Евросоюза. В последние месяцы президент особенно активно комментирует эту тему, поскольку данные западных спецслужб свидетельствуют о том, что Москва может готовиться к военным операциям против Запада. В 2…
Трамп отверг предложение Ирана открыть Ормузский пролив на неделю
Министр иностранных дел Ирана Аббас Арагчи ранее заявил журналистам в ООН, что Тегеран передал мирный план через Катар. По его словам, соглашение должно было запустить семидневный отсчет до открытия Ормузского пролива и прекращения боевых действий в регионе.
Однако Трамп сказал репортерам в Белом доме, что эта сделка его не устраивает, и Тегеран «хоч…
🇺🇸🇨🇳США и Китай договорились о взаимном снижении пошлин и запустят диалог об ИИ
США и Китай достигли «консенсуса из восьми пунктов» во время визита Си Цзиньпина в Вашингтон. Среди договоренностей — взаимное снижение пошлин примерно на $30 млрд, создание совета по торговле и продление ранее достигнутых соглашений на переговорах в Куала-Лумпуре.
Отдельно Вашингтон и Пекин договорились начать диалог по вопросам искусс…
🏔️На Монблане ужесточат правила для туристов из-за мусора
Популярный горный массив Монблан столкнулся с последствиями массового туризма. Вдоль 169-километрового маршрута через Францию, Италию и Швейцарию туристы оставляют мусор и туалетную бумагу, справляют нужду в лесу, разбивают палатки на частной территории и кормят диких животных.
С следующего лета французские власти планируют обязать туристов заранее бронирова…
Эксперты заподозрили ИИ-редактирование фото Трампа с Си Цзиньпином
Дональд Трамп опубликовал в Truth Social фотографию, на которой он стоит рядом с Си Цзиньпином на авиабазе Эндрюс. Эксперт Университета Дрекселя Мэтью Стамм заявил AFP, что снимок «почти наверняка» содержит следы генеративного ИИ.
На это, в частности, указывают отличия в одежде Трампа и женщины на заднем плане от фотографий и видео, опубликованных С…
ИИ-агенты OpenAI допустили утечку 53 изображений пользователей ChatGPT — Reuters
ИИ-агенты OpenAI получили доступ к 53 пользовательским изображениям, часть которых оказалась опубликована в интернете, сообщает Reuters.
Компания не уточнила, были ли среди них созданные ИИ изображения или фотографии реальных людей, а также когда произошла публикация. Большинство файлов уже удалили, остальные OpenAI пытается удалить со…
WP: США и Россия убрали из правил ООН пункт о проверке человеком целей боевого оружия с ИИ
Страны добились исключения нескольких ключевых ограничений из проекта международных правил по применению автономного оружия. Об этом сообщает The Washington Post со ссылкой на трех участников закрытых переговоров и изученные редакцией документы.
Переговоры по регулированию применения летального оружия с ИИ проходили в Женеве …
Марк Цукерберг заявил, что через пять лет у каждого человека будет персональный ИИ, который будет знать его жизнь и выполнять за него различные задачи
«Думаю, если перенестись на пять лет вперёд, у каждого будет ИИ-агент, который будет досконально понимать ваши цели и всё, что вас окружает, и помогать вам выполнять различные задачи».
«Многие говорят об ИИ так, будто это что-то невероятно пугающее… Я думаю, он прост…
🙉🙊Петербургский бизнесмен Илья Трабер вернул долю в компании после выхода из неё во время ареста
Петербургский бизнесмен Илья Трабер вновь стал совладельцем ООО «Приморский универсальный терминал». По данным Rusprofile, 24 сентября он вернулся в состав учредителей с долей 32%.
Летом, находясь в СИЗО, Трабер вышел из числа владельцев этой и ещё нескольких компаний. Сейчас, по данным реестра, он является учредителем …
«Никакой массовой поддержки "Единой России", конечно, не существует. […] Реальное количество людей от всех избирателей, доля взрослого населения, которая проголосовала за "Единую Россию", — точно меньше 20%. О какой-то массовой активной поддержке речь точно не идёт.»
Подробности в интервью. А как вам?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBbYXfIADb0&t=443s
💯190🤡46❤19👍13🤣7🤪4🥱3👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,595 posts we hold for @gremtelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
The Moscow Times | Russia news Rusia Noticias Rússia Notícias Russland Notizie Russie Actu Nieuws रूस समाचार Berita روسیه روسيا @moscowtimes_ru · 126,476#59
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Михаил Шейтельман з Києва @sheitelman · 119,445 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
Алена и Америка @alena_america · 27,657 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
Пархомбюро @sparkhomenkovoice · 28,674 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Antony Nut @orex62 · 51,464 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Таня Ф. @tanya_f · 21,172 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 September 2026
Тамара Эйдельман @eidelman · 79,323 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
Котрикадзе иностранных дел @k_kotrikadze · 21,843 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 September 2026
Набутовы @nabutov3 · 44,100 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
Продавец фиников @mayofis · 27,084 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
PLUSHEV/ПЛЮЩЕВ @PlushevChannel · 98,277 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
ЭХО FM @echofm_online · 39,417 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 August 2026
Город Глуповъ @gorodglupov · 155,883 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
KUCHER @StanislavKucher · 31,151 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
АДАГАМОВ @adagamov_online · 27,441 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 September 2026
Проверено.Медиа @provereno_media · 34,200 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 September 2026
Экономика и не только @banks_economy · 925,553 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Николай Травкин @NTravkin · 25,295 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
Дилетант | Официальный канал @diletantmagazine · 24,128 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
Leonid Nevzlin @leonidnevzlin · 42,296 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
Александр Роднянский @alexander_rodnyansky · 42,932 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Аббас Галлямов @abbasgallyamovpolitics · 85,919 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
Белковский @SBelkovskiy · 67,555 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
Vsya takaya Mongayt @vsyatakayamongayt · 33,011 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 September 2026
Политический Цирк @PolitCircus · 100,802 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 132 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“И Грянул Грэм” (@gremtelegram), 114,563 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gremtelegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
