Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 50 days, net +1,294. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 280,816–283,838 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Sept 2026, 22:17
282,459
-522
18 Sept 2026, 14:37
282,981
-236
16 Sept 2026, 09:01
283,217
-88
14 Sept 2026, 17:18
283,305
-90
13 Sept 2026, 04:18
283,395
-94
11 Sept 2026, 07:00
283,489
+150
8 Sept 2026, 09:01
283,339
+304
5 Sept 2026, 04:20
283,035
+1,407
3 Sept 2026, 07:55
281,628
-19
2 Sept 2026, 03:18
281,647
+131
1 Sept 2026, 06:03
281,516
-31
31 Aug 2026, 03:46
281,547
-18
30 Aug 2026, 06:08
281,565
-19
29 Aug 2026, 03:13
281,584
-11
28 Aug 2026, 06:22
281,595
+23
27 Aug 2026, 06:18
281,572
-29
26 Aug 2026, 05:25
281,601
+8
25 Aug 2026, 06:51
281,593
-43
24 Aug 2026, 07:42
281,636
+110
22 Aug 2026, 18:15
281,526
first reading
Engagement
174 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.64%
avg views ÷ 282,459 subscribers
Avg views / post
24,400
76 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
77
of 174 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
174 (31 July 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
1,853,830
Reactions total
35,622
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 07:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈416
Videos
≈650
Links
≈1,830
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
14m 06s
Average length
56s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
66,596 reactions across 164 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
35,540
53.4%
👍
22,558
33.9%
👌
2,342
3.52%
😭
1,975
2.97%
😢
1,148
1.72%
💯
1,117
1.68%
👏
1,069
1.61%
🙏
266
0.399%
👎
217
0.326%
🔥
131
0.197%
😍
96
0.144%
🥰
76
0.114%
😇
24
0.036%
😎
14
0.021%
😱
14
0.021%
🤩
9
0.014%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 170 of the 174 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69,653 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 174 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 170 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Sepblog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 174 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
جذابیت یک آدم،
فقط به ظاهر، پول یا موقعیتش نیست
اینکه در بحرانها چطور رفتار میکنه،
چطور احساساتش رو مدیریت میکنه،
و چقدر قابل اتکاست،
بخش بزرگی از جذابیت اون رو میسازه
در واقع آدمها فقط عاشق قدرت نمیشن
عاشق احساسی میشن
که در کنار یک آدمِ بالغ، قابلاتکا و باثبات تجربه میکنن
و شاید جذابترین ویژگی یک آدم،
این باشه که دیگران در کنارش
چقدر احساس امنیت میکنن…
برای شرکت در دوره ذهن آروم به آیدی
@sepblogbook
پ…
بپذیر که زندگی خیلی از اوقات
جوری که دوست داری پیش نمیره
آدمای نزدیکت ناامیدت میکنن
شرایط بر خلاف میل و انتظارت پیش میره
خواسته هات محقق نمیشن
شکست میخوری
مریض میشی
درد و رنجت ادامه پیدا میکنه و میشکنی
و همچنان ناچاری با اضطراب ادامه بدی
قبول کن که گاهی زندگی همینقدر سخته
برای شرکت در دوره ذهن آروم به آیدی
@sepblogbook
پیام بدهید
.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•
یکی از نشونههای عزتنفس،
توانایی ترک کردنِ چیزیه
که دیگه به رشدت کمکی نمیکنه
این به این معنی نیست که هر چیزی سخت، ناراحتکننده یا چالشبرانگیزه رو سریع ترک کنیم چون اتفاقاً بخشی از رشد، موندن و تلاش کردن در بعضی موقعیتهای دشواره
اما عزتنفس سالم به ما کمک میکنه تا تفاوت بین «تحمل کردن برای رشد» و «چسبیدن از روی ترس» رو تشخیص بدیم، چون گاهی آدما فقط به خاطر ترس از تنهایی، ترس از شکست، احساس گناه یا عادت، در راب…
چرا حالم خوب نمیشه؟
گاهی مشکل این نیست که حالمون بده…
مشکل اینه که مدتهاست فقط داریم دوام میاریم
کار میکنیم، حرف میزنیم، لبخند میزنیم و به زندگی ادامه میدیم، اما در درونمون خبری از اشتیاق، انرژی یا احساس زنده بودن نیست. انگار فقط روزها رو پشت سر میگذاریم و منتظریم یک چیزی بالاخره حالمون رو بهتر کند.
ویدیو کامل رو اینجا ببین
https://youtube.com/@sepblog69?si=h-4jnsVM46Pqy7pU
.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•
پرسید:
چرا بعضی وقتها
هرچقدر خودمو توضیح میدم،
باز هم احساس میکنم
فهمیده نمیشم؟
گفتم:…
چون همه قرار نیست
از زاویه دید تو
به دنیا نگاه کنن…
خیلی وقتها
مشکل این نیست که
خوب توضیح ندادی…
مشکل اینه که
طرف مقابل
آمادهی فهمیدن نیست…
وقتی مدام خودتو
توضیح میدی،
کمکم یاد میگیری
ارزش خودت رو
به تأیید دیگران گره بزنی…
انگار تا وقتی
همه قانع نشن،
حق نداری
تصمیم خودت رو بگیری…
آدمهای بالغ
میفهمن که بعضی سوءتفاهمها
ق…
خیلی از ما این روزا داریم برای دوام آوردن میجنگیم
برای بقا
برای اینکه فقط بتونیم ادامه بدیم و از پا نیفتیم
پس به خودت حق بده که کم بیاری، ضعیف بشی
انگیزه و انرژی خودتو از دست بدی
و حتی موقتاً ناامید بشی
چون قرار نبود این یکبار زندگی انقدر سخت باشه
ویدیو کامل رو اینجا ببین
https://youtube.com/@sepblog69?si=h-4jnsVM46Pqy7pU
برای شرکت در دوره ذهن آروم و کارگاه آفلاین بهبود فکر بیش از حد به آیدی
@sepblogbook
پی…
یکی از اشتباهات آدمهای مهربون اینه که
فکر میکنن مرز گذاشتن،
بیرحم بودنه!
خوب بودن یعنی به دیگران احترام بذاری
نه اینکه به خودت بیاحترامی کنی
اگه برای ناراحت نکردن دیگران،
مدام خودتو ناراحت میکنی،
اسمش مهربونی نیست
مرز داشتن یعنی
بتونی کسی رو دوست داشته باشی
و در عین حال بهش «نه» بگی
خیلیا نه از روی مهربونی،
بلکه از ترسِ طرد شدن
نمیتونن «نه» بگن
یادت باشه که آدمهای سالم
برای حفظ رابطه،
از خود…
بعضی رابطهها یه چیزایی بهت یاد میدن و یه بخش هایی از خودتو بهت نشون میدن که تابحال خودت ندیده بودیشون و اصن متوجهشون نبودی و همین یادگیریها شاید با ارزشترین نتایجی باشن که این روابط برای ما دارن…
برای خیلی از ما، بخش بزرگی از رنجمون از اینجا میاد که منتظریم دیگران ما رو کامل بفهمن، تأیید کنن یا همونطور که هستیم ببینن، اما زندگی همیشه اینطور پیش نمیره
گاهی آدمها از کنار عمیقترین احساسات، سختترین تجربهها و واقعیترین بخشهای وجود ما عبور میکنن، بدون اینکه اونها رو ببینن و شاید یکی از نشانههای پختگی این باشه که بپذیریم قرار نیست همه ما رو درک کنن
این پذیرش کمی غم داره، چون بخشی از آرزوی دیده شدن رو با خو…
ژورنالینگ یا نوشتن روزانه، یه تکنیک ساده اما مؤثر برای نظم دادن به افکار و احساساته و در این روش، هر روز چند دقیقه زمان میذاری و بدون سانسور یا قضاوت، هر چیزی رو که در ذهن و دلت میگذره رو روی کاغذ مینویسی؛ از نگرانیها و احساسات گرفته تا اتفاقات روز، افکار تکرارشونده و حتی چیزهایی که بابتشون قدردان هستی، این کار کمک میکنه ذهن از شلوغی و درهمریختگی فاصله بگیره، احساسات سرکوبشده بهتر شناخته بشه و الگوهای فکری و رفتار…
گاهی مسیرِ حالِ بهتر،
از پذیرفتنِ حالِ بد میگذره
پس بهتره با آنچه در درونت میگذره نجنگی
احساساتی که پذیرفته میشن، آرومتر از احساساتی هستن که مدام ازشون فرار میکنیم
پذیرش، تسلیم شدن نیست
یعنی به خودت اجازه بدی آنچه در درونت میگذره رو ببینی، حس کنی و تجربه کنی
غم، ترس، اضطراب و دلتنگی وقتی فرصت عبور پیدا میکنند که با اونها نجنگیم
و اغلب، راه رسیدن به آرامش از دلِ همین پذیرش میگذره
برای شرکت در دوره ذهن آروم به آی…
خیلی از ما بیشتر از عشق،
دنبال دیده شدنیم.
دنبال کسی که بگوید:
میفهمم چه کشیدی.
❤512👍203😭71👎22😢15💯5👌3
Signed Sepblog
Showing the 12 most recent of 174 posts we hold for @Sepblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@Sepblog edited 11 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
با مثالهایی که زدم به نظرت تو هم درگیر طرحواره خویشتنداری ناکافی هستی؟
آره61%
نه39%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 174 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مصطفی عرفی | Ravan.Darmani @ravandarmaani · 35,207 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 2 September 2026
هاوین | مدرسه توسعه دختران @havin_hosseiny · 51,124 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
Sep Pod @sepblogmusic · 60,728 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
Dr.mostafanaeimi @drmostafanaeimi · 140,074 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
روانشناسی|محمد وظیفه شناس @mohamadvzs · 32,632 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
MrOrdibeheshti @mrordibeheshti · 38,162 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
دکتر مریم آقایی | روانشناس بالینی @dr_maryamaghaei · 40,164 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
روابط عاطفی با ساناز شفیعی @sanaz_shafieiii · 124,969 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
Tinas @itstinass · 26,695 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 12 September 2026
دکتر شیری @drshiri · 98,287 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
Mojtaba Shakori مجتبی شکوری @mojtabashakoori_fan · 23,282 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 September 2026
مدیتیشن | حسین عرب زاده @meditation_hosin · 25,591 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
هانی پیروزرام🫧🪞 @honeyprrofficial · 45,411 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
امید امانی | Omid Amani @dr_amaniiiii · 94,573 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
زندگی سالم (سوده هروی) روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ @zendeegiesaleem · 157,463 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
صلاح الدین سنگ چین | رواندرمانگر @Online_counsel · 23,019 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
Hosein @hoseinmind · 282,771 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
•| #نرگس_صرافیان_طوفان |• @narges_sarrafian_toofan · 163,537 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
ایمان سرورپور | روان درمانگر @imansarvarpour_masir_academy · 51,122 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
در مسیرِ آگاهی🌱 @zohre_moradi_channel · 22,666 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
پادکست روانشناسی سايكوپاد @psychopod · 22,933 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
جافکری @jafekri_podcast1 · 31,757 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
Anousha @anousha_eternal · 82,677 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
دکتر سالم جعفری @drsalemjafari · 20,842 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 25 September 2026
This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sepblog | سپهر خدابنده” (@Sepblog), 282,459 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sepblog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.