Channel
@khashayartalks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
75,779subscribers
+1,488 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002150467269 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @khashayartalks |
| Description | خلاصه چیزهایی که یاد میگیرم https://linktr.ee/KhashayarTalks به غیر از این چنل در هیچ چنل تلگرامی دیگری فعالیت ندارم🙏 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/khashayartalks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 75,779 | +161 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 75,618 | +160 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 75,458 | +164 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 75,294 | +294 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 75,000 | +309 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:51 | 74,691 | +400 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 74,291 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (26 June 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 629,500 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @khashayartalks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
سلام دوستان، امیدوارم حالتون خوب باشه ☀️ من و تیمم تصمیم گرفتیم به تعدادی از کسبوکارهای جاافتاده و معتبر که قصد دارند از اهرم مدیا برای توسعه کسبوکارشان استفاده کنند، در حوزه برندینگ و تولید محتوا کمک کنیم. اگر کسبوکار باسابقهای دارید و میخواهید بهصورت جدی وارد فضای تولید محتوا و برندسازی شوید، میتوانید از طریق وبسایت Kash Media اطلاعات و رزومه کسبوکارتان را برای ما ارسال کنید. ما درخواستها را بررسی میک…
دوره رو تماشا کردین؟
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
با حمایت شما این دوره آموزشی داره در ۲۴ ساعت اول انتشار رکورد همه ویدیوهای ما رو میزنه ☀️ حمایت شما در ساعات اولیه انتشار میتونه خیلی به دیده شدنش کمک کنه
دوستانی که دوره رو دیدین میتونین ما رو در صفحات اجتماعی خودتون با استوری منشن کنین و ما هم به اشتراک میذاریم☀️🙏
File, posted without a caption
دوستان این "دوره" رایگان هست، لازم نیست جایی ثبت نام کنید و از یوتیوب میتونید تماشا کنید ☀️🙏 اگر میخواین از ما حمایت کنید میتونید با دوستاتون به اشتراک بذارین که محتوا به دست آدمای بیشتری برسه 🙏
https://youtu.be/jWOvnYdrJA8?si=YIRF7yguZFJ2AuJ- دوره محتوا و برندینگ منتشر شد🚨
فردا جمعه ساعت ۹ صبح ⏳
Voice message, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
دوره رایگان آموزش تولید محتوا زمان انتشار: جمعه ۱۶ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ Friday, August 7, 2026 این مجموعه آموزشی با یک هدف اصلی طراحی شده است: کمک به شما برای اینکه زمان و انرژی خودتان را در فضای مجازی هدر ندهید و یاد بگیرید چگونه از این فضا به شکلی هوشمندانه و هدفمند استفاده کنید تا بیشترین نتیجه را در زندگی شخصی، حرفهای یا کسبوکارتان به دست بیاورید. این دوره برای همه افراد مناسب است؛ اما اگر صاحب یک کسبوکار هستید یا قصد د…
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @khashayartalks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
دوره رو تماشا کردین؟
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 260,921 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KhashayarTalks” (@khashayartalks), 75,779 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khashayartalks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.