🎧 از لینک زیر پادکست کارنکن را به رایگان دانلود کنید یا از طریق اپهای پادکست بشنوید:
bit.ly/karnakonpodcast
✅و برای خواندن مطالب مختلف در مورد شغل و تحصیل روی لینک زیر کلیک کنید:
bit.ly/KarnakonPage
تست رایگان مهارتهای مسیر شغلی:
karnakon.ir/test/cpd
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +114. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,846–13,999 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 12:14
13,978
-3
11 Aug 2026, 15:27
13,981
+14
10 Aug 2026, 14:22
13,967
+21
9 Aug 2026, 12:33
13,946
+12
8 Aug 2026, 13:34
13,934
+29
7 Aug 2026, 11:02
13,905
+22
6 Aug 2026, 08:20
13,883
+19
6 Aug 2026, 02:30
13,864
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:10
13,864
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.6%
avg views ÷ 13,978 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,740
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.337%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
20 (23 July 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
54,880
Reactions total
169
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 02:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
218
Videos
201
Links
566
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
5m 31s
Average length
1m 23s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
169 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
103
60.9%
👏
24
14.2%
🔥
24
14.2%
👍
15
8.88%
👌
2
1.18%
🤔
1
0.592%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅ قسمت ۱۴۸ پادکست کارنکن منتشر شد.
برای چه کاری می ارزه عمرمون رو صرف کنیم؟
این سؤال شاید در نگاه اول ساده به نظر برسه اما میتونه نگاه ما به کار و زندگی رو تغییر بده. تو بخش دوم از گفتگوی من با حسام ایپکچی در این باره حرف زدیم.
چطور بفهمیم یک کار فقط درآمد داره یا واقعاً ارزش زندگی کردن باهاش رو هم داره؟
و اصلاً معیار انتخاب یک کار خوب چیه؟
درباره نوشتن، شکلگیری پادکست انسانک و تجربه حسام از ساختن یک رسانه هم ح…
سلام رفقا
اگر ادیت ویدیو بلدید و دوست دارید با کارنکن همکاری کنید، به اکانت پشتیبانی کارنکن پیغام بدید و:
• خودتون رو معرفی کنید و بگید از کی با کارنکن آشنا شدید.
• نمونه کارتون رو بفرستید.
• تعرفه کارتون رو اعلام کنید.
برای موارد زیر اگر نمونه کار دارید به تفکیک نمونهها رو بفرستید:
۱- ویدیوی بلند یوتیوب
۲- هایلایت یوتیوب (ابتدای ویدیوهای پادکست نمونهش هست)
۳- شورتویدیوی یوتیوب یا ریلز اینستاگرام
آیدی تلگرام پش…
دیروز جلسه معارفه یکی از پروژههای بزرگ و هیجانانگیز این روزهای کارنکن برگزار شد.
قراره بیش از هزار دانشجوی دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر، همزمان با دوره کارآموزیشون، دوره طراحی مسیر شغلی کارنکن رو جلو ببرن؛ دوره رو ببینن، تمرینهاش رو انجام بدن و هرکدوم یک منتور داشته باشن که بهصورت فردبهفرد همراهشون باشه و روی تمرینهاشون بازخورد بده.
از دیشب تا الان هم حدود ۵۰۰ نفر برای شروع دوره، دریافت لایسنس و مشخصشدن منتورشون…
اگر دانشجوی امیرکبیر هستید و توی این تابستون درس کارآموزی رو برداشتید، خوشبهحالتون 😊
قراره دوره طراحی مسیر شغلی رو برای همه بچههای دانشگاه (بیش از ۱۱۰۰ نفر) برگزار کنیم و حداقل ۳ نمره درس کارآموزیتون هم بسته به عملکردتون توی این دوره کارنکن داره.
اطلاعات بیشتر رو از سایت دانشگاه بخونید:
https://aut.ac.ir/content/30448/
و اینکه فردا هم ساعت ۱۹ جلسه معارفه این دوره از طریق لایو آپارات توی لینک زیر برگزار میشه که…
✅ قسمت ۱۴۷ پادکست کارنکن منتشر شد.
مهمان این قسمت حسام ایپکچیه؛ گفتگو با حسام از یه سؤال خیلی ساده شروع میشه «شغلت چیه؟»
ولی کمکم میرسیم به سؤالهایی که یه کم جدیترن.
اصلاً کار یعنی چی؟ چه فرقی با کسب داره؟ چقدر طرز فکر کردنمون روی کیفیت زندگیمون اثر میذاره؟ و چرا بعضی تصمیمها مسیر زندگیمون رو کلاً عوض میکنن؟
توی این اپیزود درباره دقت در فکر کردن، مهارت حرف زدن، انتخاب رشته، تجربه حقوق، فناوری، حکمرانی، ترک…
اگر وسط کار یا درس میگید فقط چند دقیقه گوشیم رو چک کنم و بعدش ذهنتون درگیر اون پیام، ویدیو و… میمونه.
توصیه میکنم راهکارهایی که توی این ویدیو گفته شده رو اجرا کنید👇🏽
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbNthduOF6B/?igsh=MXV4d213dHgyMjcyMQ==
💭 این دلایل شما برای عقب انداختن یادگیری چنین مهارت مهمیه:
«فعلاً پولش رو ندارم...»
«میترسم دوره رو نصفه رها کنم...»
«بعداً تهیه میکنم...»
برای همین:
✅ پرداخت اقساطی گذاشتیم
✅ امکان رزرو گذاشتیم
✅منتورینگ تخصصی گذاشتیم
✅ ضمانت بازگشت وجه گذاشتیم
واقعاً سعی کردیم هیچ مانعی برای شروع مسیر باقی نمونه، چون از شرکت کنندهای قبلی دیدیم که چقدر این مهارت میتونه روی میزان رضایتتون از زندگی، خودتون و کارتون اثرگذار باشه.
…
❗️یه سوال...
اگر امروز هم ثبتنام نکنید، فکر میکنید سه ماه دیگه چه چیزی تغییر کرده؟
تمرکزتون بهتر میشه؟
ذهنتون آرومتر میشه؟
یا دوباره همون چرخهی همیشگی تکرار میشه؟
گاهی بزرگترین هزینه، پولی نیست که خرج میکنیم...
هزینهی واقعی، تغییر نکردنه.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @karnakon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@karnakon edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 109,304 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
تهران پادکست | پادکست و کتاب صوتی @tehranpodcast · 228,444 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کارنکن” (@karnakon), 13,978 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/karnakon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.