Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

فرانت چپتر 🥕

@FrontChapter

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,364subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001384929456
TypeChannel
Username@FrontChapter
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FrontChapter

Growth

3,3633,3663,364.56 August 2026 — 3,363 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,365 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,366 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,364 subscribers3,3646 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,363–3,366 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:033,364-2
10 Aug 2026, 04:013,366+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:403,365+2
6 Aug 2026, 18:463,363first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.2%
avg views ÷ 3,364 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,890
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.476%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026
Posts held20 (27 February 202517 July 2026)
Views total1,890
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

336 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥18053.6%
😍3811.3%
❤‍🔥329.52%
🎉205.95%
🤣185.36%
175.06%
🦄133.87%
👾102.98%
🤩61.79%
👻20.595%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 336reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 February 2025 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FrontChapter. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 February 2025 to 17 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 16:55 UTC≈1,890 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚀 ویدیوی نشست ۶۵ فرانت‌چپتر منتشر شد! 💻 موضوع: تحول کروم با هوش مصنوعی آیا می‌دانستید کروم دارد هوش مصنوعی را مستقیم داخل مرورگر و به‌صورت آفلاین اجرا می‌کند؟ 🤔 در این گفتگوی جذاب، میزبان محمد شیرعلی‌زاده عزیز بودیم تا Built-in AI APIs کروم را از نزدیک بررسی و تست کنیم؛ بدون نیاز به اینترنت و بدون اتکا به سرویس‌های ابری مثل Gemini یا OpenAI. اگر می‌خواهید بدانید چطور می‌شود مستقیم داخل مرورگر ترجمه کرد، خلاصه‌ساز

🔥9

13 Jun 2026, 08:19 UTC≈4,540 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚀 ویدیوی نشست ۶۸ فرانت‌چپتر منتشر شد! 💻 موضوع: از پرامپت تا پروداکشن (آینده توسعه نرم‌افزار) چگونه می‌توانیم یک درخواست (پرامپت) ساده را به یک محصول نهایی و در حال اجرا تبدیل کنیم؟ 🤔 در این گفتگوی جذاب، میزبان رامین رضایی عزیز (مهندس ارشد نرم‌افزار در Sinch) بودیم تا مسیر توسعه نرم‌افزار با کمک هوش مصنوعی را بررسی کنیم. اگر می‌خواهید بدانید ابزارهایی مثل Claude و هوش مصنوعی گوگل چه تاثیری در پیاده‌سازی فیچرهای پیچی

🔥123🎉1🤣1🦄1

8 Jun 2026, 08:38 UTC≈6,570 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Prompt to Production مسیر جدید توسعه نرم‌افزار توسعه‌دهندگان در دنیای امروز چه تصوری از آینده‌ی این مسیر دارند؟ آیا توسعه‌دهندگان همچنان فقط رابط کاربری می‌سازند؟ یا در حال تبدیل شدن به معماران سیستم‌هایی هستند که با هوش مصنوعی ساخته می‌شوند؟ در نشست ۶۸ فرانت‌چپتر، رامین رضایی تجربه‌های خود از سه کنفرانس مطرح بین‌المللی را با ما به اشتراک می‌گذارد: 🔹 Google Summit 🔹 Anthropic Claude Code Event 🔹 React Norway 🎙

🔥13❤‍🔥1

13 Nov 2025, 09:51 UTC≈5,760 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🍪 Protecting Your Cookies from Hackers and Hungry Developers! کسی تا حالا کوکی‌هات رو خورده؟ 😄 فردا شب، توی جلسه‌ی ۶۷ فرانت‌چپتر، قراره به دنیای امنیت مرورگر و کوکی‌ها سفر کنیم! 🎙 پیشگام گفت‌وگو: محمد شیرعلی‌زاده 🦁 مهندس ارشد نرم‌افزار در ING Bank و از فعال‌ترین ایرانی‌ها در کنفرانس‌های بین‌المللی مثل React Conf و FrontendNation! 🔥 این فقط یه گفت‌وگو نیست! قراره یه ارائه‌ی کاربردی و کار عملی هم داشته باشیم تا بفه

🔥12🎉2🤣1😍1

12 Nov 2025, 12:11 UTC≈3,140 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @menteenoPhoto

🧑‍💻 خبر خوب برای برنامه‌نویس‌ها! دومین "ایونت حضوری منتینو" پنجشنبه ۲۹ آبان 🎉 اینجا برای اون‌هاییه که می‌خوان رشد کنن، یاد بگیرن، با آدم‌های هم‌حوزه‌شون ارتباط واقعی بسازن و فراتر از یک کدنویس باشن. قراره کنار هم گفت‌وگوهای عمیق و دوطرفه داشته باشیم، مهارت‌های نرم‌مون رو تمرین کنیم، شبکه‌سازی کنیم و با بازی و چالش، یادگیری رو تجربه کنیم. اینجا جاییه برای همه‌ی کارهایی که کمک می‌کنه توی مسیر حرفه‌ای‌مون جلوتر بریم

❤‍🔥6🎉4🤣1

12 Oct 2025, 15:54 UTC≈3,990 views11 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

درود بر دوستان فرانت‌چپتری، این هفته یکی از اعضای فعال جمع‌مون، پوریا باباعلی عزیز قراره یه ایونت جذاب و فنی برگزار کنه. موضوع رویداد، گفت‌وگو درباره‌ی Flux، TypeScript و تجربه‌های واقعی توسعه‌ی نرم‌افزار هست. 📍 محل برگزاری: هفت و هشت، کارخونه نوآوری 🗓 زمان: جمعه، ساعت ۱۷ تا ۲۰ علاوه بر مباحث فنی، فضای خوبی برای شبکه‌سازی و تبادل تجربه هم فراهم شده. برای اعضای فرانت‌چپتر هم کد تخفیف FrontChapter در نظر گرفته شده که

🔥11

2 Oct 2025, 09:55 UTC≈7,660 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎮 ایونت حضوری منتینو: تقویت مهارت‌های نرم برای برنامه‌نویس‌ها یه تجربه متفاوت و کاربردی برای برنامه‌نویس‌ها و فعالای دنیای تکنولوژی! توی این رویداد علاوه بر یه بازی گروهی جذاب که مخصوص تمرین مهارت‌های نرم کلیدی برای برنامه‌نویس‌ها طراحی شده، یه پنل گفت‌وگوی تخصصی هم داریم. چی در انتظارتونه؟ ✨ بازی گروهی تعاملی برای تمرین واقعی مهارت‌هایی مثل: ✨ کار تیمی ✨ ارتباط مؤثر ✨ حل مسئله ✨ تصمیم‌گیری درست رو به‌طور واقعی تم

🔥6😍2❤‍🔥1🤩1

7 Aug 2025, 10:40 UTC≈4,240 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

بچه‌ها با کد تخفیف FRONTCHAPTER میتونید ۱.۵ میلیون تخفیف بگیرید. اگر به تک لید شدن علاقه‌مند هستید، این فرصت رو از دست ندید

🔥5👾2🎉1

7 Aug 2025, 10:37 UTC≈3,800 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @learning_with_mPhoto

🔥🔥 خبر خبر 🔥🔥 بلاخره زمان پیدا کردم تا دوره جدید Techlead 360 رو شروع کنم 🎉 خیلی درخواست داده بودید و من وقتش رو نداشتم، ولی حالا برای شهریور ماه این کلاس 4 روزه رو برای علاقه مندان برنامه ریزی کردم. محتوی جدید هم بر اساس تجربه و مطالعه به دوره اضافه شده. توی این دوره شما در مورد این یاد میگیرید که : 1. یک تکلید باید چه خصوصیاتی داشته باشه. 2. یک تکلید در تیم چه وظایفی داره. 3. یک تکلید در سازمان چه وظایفی داره. دو

🎉42🔥2🦄2😍2👻1

31 Jul 2025, 15:30 UTC≈11,000 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 گفت‌وگو و دورهمی آزاد توسعه دهنده‌های فرانت‌اند ⭐ جلسه‌ی ۶۶: کارگاه آنلاین و رایگان از ایده تا محصول در ۲ ساعت با AI 👑 پیشگام گفت‌وگو: صالح شجاعی 🗓 تاریخ: دوشنبه ۱۳ مرداد ماه 🕔 ساعت: ۱۸ الی ۲۰ ▶️ جلسه در گوگل‌میت برگزار می‌شود و شرکت برای همه آزاد و رایگان است. 📣 افزودن به تقویم 🛸 لینک میت جلسه 💎 پیام‌رسان: 💬 ارسال پیامک، آسون تر از همیشه @payam_resan_com فرانت چپتر؛ محیطی صمیمی برای گفت‌وگوی تخصصی 🥕@FrontChapt

🔥10🎉21👾1🦄1😍1

9 Jul 2025, 16:43 UTC≈7,560 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 گفت‌وگو و دورهمی آزاد توسعه دهنده‌های فرانت‌اند ⭐ جلسه‌ی ۶۵: تحول کروم با هوش مصنوعی 👑 پیشگام گفت‌وگو: محمد شیرعلی‌زاده 🗓 تاریخ: جمعه ۲۰ تیر ماه 🕔 ساعت: ۱۸ الی ۱۹:۳۰ ▶️ جلسه در گوگل‌میت برگزار می‌شود و شرکت برای همه آزاد و رایگان است. 📣 افزودن به تقویم 🛸 لینک میت جلسه 💎 حامی: 🌱 منتینو، جایی برای رشد واقعی تو فرانت چپتر؛ محیطی صمیمی برای گفت‌وگوی تخصصی 🥕@FrontChapter - #frontChapter

🔥143🎉1👾1🤣1

13 Jun 2025, 09:05 UTC≈4,620 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

نشست امروز لغو شده و تاریخ برگزاری دوباره‌اش اطلاع‌رسانی خواهد شد

❤‍🔥18

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FrontChapter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 255,787 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فرانت چپتر 🥕” (@FrontChapter), 3,364 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FrontChapter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.