16 Aug 2023, 19:31 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 7 August 2026
$spx - 600k mcap https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x52c77b0cb827afbad022e6d6caf2c44452edbc39 just threw in a small amount, high risk
Channel
FAST's PALACE
@fastspalace
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,327subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001952048582 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fastspalace |
| Created | 14 July 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fastspalace |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 3,327 | -9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 3,336 | -13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 3,349 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 3,355 | first reading |
Engagement
3 posts held, back to 14 July 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2023 to 16 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
20 Jul 2023, 18:22 UTC≈1,070 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo
currently watching $Mog ill leave the link down below. im trying to wait for a decent entry here. i feel like its pretty solid, its floating around a 2.1m mcap right now but ultimately trying to see about getting a decent entry. kind of just waiting on standby to see how it moves for a bit, ofc not in any rush for a play. https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xc2eab7d33d3cb97692ecb231a5d0e4a649cb539d
❤3
14 Jul 2023, 02:27 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @fastspalace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 113,573
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
@PowsGemCalls · 113,573
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FAST's PALACE” (@fastspalace), 3,327 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fastspalace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.