Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Грамотность на «Меле»

@gramota_mel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

20,141subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001132476538
TypeChannel
Username@gramota_mel
Descriptionhttps://mel.fm/gramotnost Регистрация в перечне владельцев страниц в соцсетях: https://clck.ru/3F9PSe
Created23 May 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gramota_mel

Growth

20,14120,15620,148.56 August 2026 — 20,156 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,156 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,153 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,154 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,156 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,152 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,153 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,151 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,147 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,141 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,139–20,158 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:2420,141-6
13 Aug 2026, 08:5320,147-4
12 Aug 2026, 07:3320,151-2
11 Aug 2026, 09:0320,153+1
10 Aug 2026, 06:0020,152-4
9 Aug 2026, 03:1120,156+2
8 Aug 2026, 03:0320,154+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:4720,153-3
6 Aug 2026, 02:0620,156no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:4720,156first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.6%
avg views ÷ 20,141 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,940
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.685%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held38 (27 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total149,701
Reactions total1,025
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
616
Videos
2
Links
1,980

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

900 reactions across 34 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍29833.1%
20923.2%
😁20322.6%
🔥9810.9%
🤔424.67%
🤯252.78%
😢101.11%
🎉50.556%
👏40.444%
😱30.333%
🤩30.333%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,025reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC≈2,260 views19 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Перед «что» всегда ставится запятая В школе нас учили именно так. Прикиньте, вас обманули. Есть 10 случаев, когда запятая перед «что» не нужна 🫪

👍118

15 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC654 views21 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Poll

Где грамотно расставлены запятые? 🧐

  1. Делай, что должно, и будь, что будет23%
  2. Делай что должно, и будь что будет73%
  3. Ниче не делай только кайфуй3%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁15🎉51

14 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC≈3,180 views20 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

По статистике, на среду планируется на 20% меньше встреч. Причина: никто не знает, как правильно — «по среда́м» или «по сре́дам». Ударение зависит от значения 📆

🤔11👍72

13 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC≈3,420 views30 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

«Непонятно» или «не понятно»? Правильны оба варианта, просто используются в разных случаях. Когда писать слитно, когда раздельно и как не ошибиться — сейчас всё станет понятно 😌

😁12🔥8👍64

12 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC≈3,980 views24 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Есть тут почитатели Пелевина? 👀 В 1990-х писатель одним из первых использовал слово «паттерн» на русском — в рассказе «Происхождение видов». Сегодня без паттернов уже никуда: о них говорят психологи, дизайнеры, экономисты и врачи. Но что вообще значит это слово и как правильно: па́ттерн или патте́рн? 🔍

12😁7👍5

12 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC≈3,720 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Poll

Поведенческий

  1. па́ттерн80%
  2. патте́рн20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2👍1

11 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈4,280 views38 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Во избежание солнечного удара — носите панаму. Во избежание выгорания — не пытайтесь за оставшиеся три недели лета успеть всё. А во избежание ошибки — запомните, как пишется этот предлог. Потому что даже Чехов, Фет и братья Стругацкие не всегда писали его правильно 🧐

23👍14🤯1

11 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈4,220 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Poll

Быстро, не гугля: как правильно? 👀

  1. во избежание75%
  2. во избежании25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍116

10 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈1,490 views34 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Сюрприз! Ребенок и «развитой», и «развитый». К каким еще сферам применимо прилагательное «развитой» — читайте по клику

👍198🔥7

10 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC≈1,420 views35 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Poll

Мы своего уже на шахматы, айкидо, китайский и бисероплетение записали. Он у нас ребенок…

  1. рАзвитый65%
  2. развитОй35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤯20👍9🤔6

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @gramota_mel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTCAnonymous Quiz377 voters

Где грамотно расставлены запятые? 🧐

  1. Делай, что должно, и будь, что будет23%
  2. Делай что должно, и будь что будет73%
  3. Ниче не делай только кайфуй3%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,050 voters approx.

Поведенческий

  1. па́ттерн80%
  2. патте́рн20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,340 voters approx.

Быстро, не гугля: как правильно? 👀

  1. во избежание75%
  2. во избежании25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTCAnonymous Quiz473 voters

Мы своего уже на шахматы, айкидо, китайский и бисероплетение записали. Он у нас ребенок…

  1. рАзвитый65%
  2. развитОй35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTCAnonymous Quiz588 voters

💵 Пусть ваша зарплата никогда не будет…

  1. мИзерной72%
  2. мизЕрной28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,470 voters approx.

Уймись ужо, егоза! Всё тебе...

  1. не имётся14%
  2. неймётся86%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 68,263 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Грамотность на «Меле»” (@gramota_mel), 20,141 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gramota_mel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.