Channel
@markoroleva
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
9,947subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001225968716 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @markoroleva |
| Description | https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/69b9483669300d92f19ffe48 Да, та самая Марина Королёва. Профессор института медиа НИУ ВШЭ, к.ф.н. Веду этот канал сама. https://marinakoroleva.org Вопросы и предложения о сотрудничестве: [email protected] |
| Created | 7 April 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/markoroleva |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 9,947 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 9,949 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:49 | 9,959 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 9,959 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (22 May 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 15,090 |
| Reactions total | 749 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
3,077 reactions across 25 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 943 | 30.6% | |
| 👍 | 878 | 28.5% | |
| 😁 | 318 | 10.3% | |
| 🤔 | 293 | 9.52% | |
| 😢 | 213 | 6.92% | |
| 🤣 | 206 | 6.69% | |
| 🔥 | 137 | 4.45% | |
| 👎 | 80 | 2.60% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 0.292% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ВООЧИЮ Оказывается, слово пишут и так: воочую. Пожалуй, это может сравниться только с моей любимой ошибкой в одном из диктантов – «глаз вопиющего в пустыне». Комментарии тут не нужны. «Воочию», наречие: своими глазами, лично; наглядно, явственно. Увидеть что-то воочию, представить себе воочию. Слово определяется словарями как книжное, по происхождению церковнославянское. Написание нужно просто запомнить. #русс…
👍52❤37🤣17😁2
«В России две беды: дураки и дороги»: кто автор? Ну что, дорогие, похоже, это одна из самых впечатляющих мистификаций последних десятилетий – когда сказанное приняли на веру и никто не счел нужным проверить источник. В эти самые «никто» вхожу и я! Если бы вы спросили меня до сегодняшнего утра, кто является автором известного всем выражения «В России две беды: дураки и дороги», я, немного поколебавшись, ответил…
❤111👍74🔥27🤔6
ОПРОС. Кто, по-вашему, автор выражения "В России две беды: дураки и дороги"? Только, пожалуйста, никуда не заглядывая.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔥16🤔6❤3
Позвонили утром с одной из радиостанций. Звонок был прекрасен тем, что исходил от одного из моих бывших студентов (ура! работает по специальности! это ли не счастье преподавателя?). Он просил меня выйти в прямой эфир, чтобы «с филологической точки зрения» прокомментировать всем известное выражение – «В России две беды: дураки и дороги». Инфоповод – высказывание вице-премьера М. Хуснуллина, который назвал это выражени…
👍31🤔10🔥5
ГРАФФИТИ Первое: ударение. Правильно: граффИти. Второе. В слове пишутся две буквы Ф (от итальянского graffiti). Третье. В русском языке это слово употребляется только во множественном числе: «уличные граффити», «граффити на стенах домов». Кстати, существует еще и слово «граффИто» - не отдельный рисунок на заборе, а особая техника декоративной отделки стен. Тоже несклоняемое, но среднего рода (граффИто – оно). Ис…
👍90🔥17🤔7❤5👎3😁1
ОТПУСК Рада, что мне не удалось сбить вас с толку своим опросом. Большинство из тех, кто проголосовали, знают, что множественное число слова «отпуск» – отпускА, отпускОв. Это литературная норма. Не Отпуски! Предложный падеж единственного числа – «в Отпуске», "об Отпуске». «Я в отпускУ» - разговорная форма, нежелательная. Отличных отпускОв тем, кто сейчас в Отпуске! Карточка про "отпуск" была у нас здесь когда-то, н…
❤73👍50👎4🤔3🔥1
ОПРОС. Как вы произнесете слово "отпуск" в этих фразах?
The shares total 169%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍17🤔8
Знаю, знаю, всё знаю. Нельзя так надолго уходить. Надеюсь только на то, что и вам всё это время было не до телеграм-каналов: всё-таки лето!.. В любом случае, спасибо вам, что никуда не ушли, дождались. Интересно, что последним словом, которое мы здесь разбирали перед долгим перерывом – «ожидальная». Будем считать, что это она и была, та самая ожидальная😎. Возвращаемся понемногу из отпусков. Кстати, в связи со …
❤53👍14😁6
Итак, ОЖИДАЛЬНАЯ. Для начала: а есть ли такое слово в современном русском языке? Поиск по словарям на портале «Грамота» ничего не дает. Но предлагает вместо искомого другое слово – «ожидальня». Вот она, «ожидальня» - да, вроде бы есть. И это как раз комната ожидания, комната для ожидающих приема, приёмная. Рядом со словом в словарях помета – «разговорное». Тем не менее, в Национальном корпусе русского языка (не прен…
👍91🤔44❤6👎3😢1
ОПРОС. Как вы относитесь к слову "ожидальная"?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Внимательный читатель прислал фото: в одной из московских больниц есть ОЖИДАЛЬНАЯ. Предназначение понятно – место, где можно подождать приема, подождать родных, с которыми пришел сюда. Вообще подождать. Хорошо, что есть такое место в больнице. Но слово, слово! Как вам оно?.. Сейчас проведем опрос.
👎55🤔25🤣19👍12❤4
«Прием ацетилки назначен пожизненно. Но от нее столько побочек!» О, эти ацетилки, побочки, молочки… #ворчаниефилолога
😁85😢50❤18
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @markoroleva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@markoroleva edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ОПРОС. Кто, по-вашему, автор выражения "В России две беды: дураки и дороги"? Только, пожалуйста, никуда не заглядывая.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
ОПРОС. Как вы произнесете слово "отпуск" в этих фразах?
The shares total 169%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
ОПРОС. Как вы относитесь к слову "ожидальная"?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
ОПРОС. «Там есть местечковые автобусные маршруты, посмотрите расписание в интернете». Правильно использовано слово «местечковый»?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ОПРОС. С каким ударением вы произносите слово "одновременно"?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 770,669 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | No label recorded on this Wikidata item |
|---|---|
| Description | Russian journalist |
| X / Twitter | @MarKoroleva |
| Official site | http://www.bergloga.ru/ |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Королёва. Русский в порядке” (@markoroleva), 9,947 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/markoroleva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.