Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Системный Блокъ

Channel

Системный Блокъ

@sysblok

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,606subscribers

+100 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001343774152
TypeChannel
Username@sysblok
Description«Системный Блокъ» — издание о цифровых технологиях в культуре, искусстве, образовании и обществе. Финалист премии «Просветитель» sysblok.ru vk.com/sysblok fb.com/sysblok instagram.com/sysblok/ Присоединяйтесь к команде: sysblok.ru/join
Created9 July 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sysblok

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,50511,61711,5615 August 2026 — 11,506 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,506 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,505 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,523 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,526 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,525 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,524 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,520 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,517 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,519 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,523 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,525 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,528 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,526 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,525 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,523 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,525 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,543 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,553 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,555 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,559 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,560 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,557 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,565 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,564 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,562 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,561 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,562 subscribers7 September 2026 — 11,556 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,552 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,555 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,560 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,566 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,569 subscribers30 September 2026 — 11,564 subscribers6 October 2026 — 11,572 subscribers10 October 2026 — 11,565 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,561 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,562 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,564 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,568 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,583 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,590 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,591 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,587 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,596 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,603 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,612 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,610 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,613 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,616 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,613 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,612 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,613 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,617 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,614 subscribers8 November 2026 — 11,615 subscribers9 November 2026 — 11,616 subscribers11 November 2026 — 11,606 subscribers11,6065 August 202611 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 98 days, net +100. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,488–11,634 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 19:3911,606-10
9 Nov 2026, 20:5511,616+1
8 Nov 2026, 12:5411,615+1
7 Nov 2026, 04:2611,614-3
6 Nov 2026, 01:0811,617+4
5 Nov 2026, 03:0811,613+1
4 Nov 2026, 01:1811,612-1
3 Nov 2026, 00:2711,613-3
1 Nov 2026, 21:2711,616+3
31 Oct 2026, 20:4811,613+3
28 Oct 2026, 23:5811,610-2
26 Oct 2026, 00:5911,612+9
24 Oct 2026, 22:0511,603+7
23 Oct 2026, 23:0711,596+9
23 Oct 2026, 01:2011,587-4
22 Oct 2026, 00:5011,591+1
20 Oct 2026, 23:1411,590+7
19 Oct 2026, 19:0611,583+15
18 Oct 2026, 18:1911,568+4
17 Oct 2026, 21:4111,564first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.3%
avg views ÷ 11,606 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,480
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held44 (8 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total24,772
Reactions total480
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 21:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈379
Videos
≈2
Links
≈1,120

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,927 reactions across 44 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤80741.9%
🔥60631.4%
👍23011.9%
❤‍🔥804.15%
👏452.34%
🤔201.04%
😁170.882%
💔160.83%
🤡130.675%
👎120.623%
✍100.519%
👾80.415%
🥰80.415%
🕊70.363%
🥴60.311%
🐳50.259%
👨‍💻50.259%
🦄50.259%
😈40.208%
🤝40.208%
9 further kinds190.986%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,927 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (30.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 09:24 UTC822 views32 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Как построить план по самообразованию и поддерживать мотивацию учиться Цели есть, а мотивации нет? Или наоборот — рвения хватает, а плана ноль? Рассказываем, как начать самообучение и не бросить на полпути. Как выбрать тип обучения Прежде чем составлять свое расписание, определите тип обучения, который вам нужен. Краткосрочное обучение подходит тем, кто хочет подтянуть знания или получить конкретный навык, а его …

👍13❤10🔥9

10 Nov 2026, 14:56 UTC≈1,240 views45 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

«Иишка» и «вайбкодинг» борются за титул слова года с «тревожником» и «воздуханом» Портал «Грамота.ру» опубликовал шорт-лист акции «Слово года»: 5 из 10 слов связаны с искусственным интеллектом Портал «Грамота.ру» подвел итоги первого тура акции «Слово года». Из 500 слов-претендентов лингвисты Грамоты отобрали те, которые чаще встречаются в поисковых запросах, соцсетях и в СМИ. В шорт-лист вошло 10 слов, которые пок…

❤27🔥8👍5😁4👎1

6 Nov 2026, 07:01 UTC≈2,150 views48 reactionsread 11 November 2026

И швец, и жнец, и на дуде игрец: что такое ИИ-агент Чат-бот отвечает на сообщение, а ИИ-агент может самостоятельно выполнять последовательность действий — открывать сервисы, искать файлы, запускать программы, заполнять формы и отправлять письма. Разбираемся, как устроены агенты, какие задачи им можно доверить и какие риски создает их использование. Как работает ИИ-агент Главный признак агента — агентность, то есть…

❤30👏10👍4✍2👌1😈1

2 Nov 2026, 15:53 UTC≈2,200 views52 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Наследники Элвиса Пресли судятся с Anthropic Истцы требуют 41,1 млн долларов за обучение Claude на 274 песнях музыканта Компания Authentic Brands Group, которая управляет правами на наследие Элвиса Пресли, вместе с другими правообладателями подала иск против Anthropic, разработчика языковых моделей Claude. Истцы утверждают, что компания без лицензии и оплаты использовала тексты и композиции 274 песен Пресли для обу…

❤18❤‍🔥10✍8🤔5😁3😈3🍌2👍2

31 Oct 2026, 07:26 UTC≈2,630 views39 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Эволюция художественного текста, или Как подружить Гоголя и Git Как на одной странице показать, что менялось в «Ревизоре» между редакциями? DH-исследователь Евгений Дуненков сделал для этого интерактивный инструмент и в своем блоге рассказал, как над ним работал и с какими сложностями столкнулся. Постановка задачи Есть много текстов, которые постоянно меняются. Например, код или юридические документы: в Git или «К…

❤21🔥15👍3

25 Oct 2026, 12:06 UTC≈2,420 views28 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @portalgramotaruPhoto

Вы предлагали слова года — рассказываем, что получилось! Сбор претендентов на звание «Слово года» по версии Грамоты завершен. Спасибо всем, кто присылал свои варианты! Среди предложений — «нейрослоп», «сикс-севен», «нишевый», «прайм-эра» и множество других слов. Сейчас мы изучаем кандидатов, замеряем их популярность и готовим короткий список для голосования экспертов. Но уже сейчас можно обсудить первые результаты.…

❤13🔥10👍3👎2

25 Oct 2026, 12:06 UTC≈2,220 views23 reactionsread 11 November 2026

«Грамота.ру» представит первые результаты «Слова года» Мы продолжаем рассказывать о конкурсе «Слово года», который проводит портал «Грамота.ру», и приглашаем вас на открытую онлайн-лекцию «Слово года — 2026: тренды и сюрпризы». Пользовательское голосование завершилось — теперь специалисты «Грамоты.ру» готовы рассказать о том, какие неожиданные открытия оно принесло. Лекция состоится 28 октября. Как зарегистрировать…

🔥12❤7👍4

23 Oct 2026, 16:04 UTC≈4,780 views87 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Битва за феминитивы: взгляд лингвиста Почему «программистка» звучит естественно, а «авторка» и «членка» многим режут слух? И может ли сознательное употребление феминитивов сработать против целей говорящего? В новом выпуске своего блога лингвист Алексей Богданов разбирается, что говорит о феминитивах наука о языке. Пересказываем самое интересное. Что такое феминитивы Феминитивы — существительные женского рода, обоз…

🔥39❤21👍13👎5🤔5🕊4

17 Oct 2026, 07:32 UTC≈2,730 views43 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

От переводчика до AI-тренера: как меняются профессии в эпоху больших языковых моделей Каждую неделю появляются новости о том, что ИИ скоро оставит нас без работы. Особенно тревожно тем, кто работает с текстом: переводчикам, копирайтерам, редакторам. ИИ ведь может и написать, и отредактировать текст за секунды. Но исследования показывают другое: профессии не исчезают, а меняются, и появляются совсем новые роли. Разби…

❤20❤‍🔥11🔥8🥴3👍1

14 Oct 2026, 13:41 UTC≈3,580 views83 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤42❤‍🔥18🔥16🕊3🤔2🤡2

8 Oct 2026, 15:11 UTC≈2,630 views35 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

«Системный Блокъ» выбирает слово года вместе с «Грамотой» Портал «Грамота» в четвертый раз выбирает слово года. В этом году «Системный Блокъ» — информационный партнер проекта. Мы расскажем о шорт-листе и итогах, а наши эксперты по NLP прокомментируют слова о технологиях. 📖 Как выбирают «Слово года»? Отбор состоит из трех этапов: лонг-лист, в который попадают слова из опросов на сайте и в соцсетях, шорт-лист на осн…

🔥20❤7👍6🎉2

7 Oct 2026, 16:39 UTC≈3,110 views48 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Марш энциклопедистов: легендарная вселенная профессора Фортрана вчера и сегодня Как детская книга о компьютерах 1991 года помогла целому поколению освоить технику, которая тогда казалась незнакомой? Новый выпуск блога Бориса Орехова — об «Энциклопедии профессора Фортрана», ее создателях, героях и мире, где компьютер превращается в огромный город. Пересказываем самое интересное. Как компьютер стал понятным В 1990-е…

❤25🔥16👍7

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @sysblok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTCAnonymous Quiz428 voters

Если бы Лев Николаевич назвал вас уветливым, то он бы имел в виду, что вы...

  1. Терпеливый и спокойный18%
  2. Ласковый и приветливый30%
  3. Добрый и скромный11%
  4. Хитрый и смелый41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Jul 2026, 11:02 UTCAnonymous Quiz440 voters

В середине XVIII века с этим словом ассоциировались «локон» и «облик», а в начале XXI — «специализация» и «конфигурация»

  1. Срез9%
  2. Портрет3%
  3. Силуэт7%
  4. Профиль80%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Записки Цицерона
@notas_cicero · 10,147
4 posts
📚 Что почитать? • Книги
@b_books_s · 7,710
2 posts
Books & Reviews
@books_reviews · 12,929
2 posts
DH CLOUD
@dhcloud · 869
2 posts
Пишу тебе
@pishuteberu · 470
2 posts
Сложное предложение Игоря Исаева
@simple_sentence · 4,569
2 posts
Альянс цифровых гуманитарных проектов
@alliance4humanities · 359
1 post
Высокое Средневековье
@altaaetasmedia · 3,623
1 post
ARI COLUMNA
@c_o_l_u_m_n_a · 143
1 post
Гуманитарии в цифре
@DHRIsfu · 2,789
1 post
Цифровой библиотекарь и не только
@digital_librarian · 5,968
1 post
Цифровой филолог👩‍💻
@digital_philologist · 979
1 post
Культурный датасайнс (Даня Скоринкин)
@fckndh · 2,007
1 post
Инт-языки/Intlanguages
@intlanguages · 255
1 post
Мемори и другие стадиз
@memory_studies · 2,117
1 post
Наследие наследило
@nasledie_nasledilo · 687
1 post
античные лолы и кеки
@patroclusisnotdead · 484
1 post
Прожито
@prozhito · 3,680
1 post
про Пушкин ⟨цифровой⟩
@pushkin_digital · 131
1 post
сегодня я нашла в НКРЯ
@ruscorpora_is_fun · 875
1 post
speculative_fiction | Василий Владимирский
@SpeculativeFiction · 4,738
1 post
Страна языков
@stranayaz · 1,172
1 post
TechSparks
@techsparks · 46,736
1 post
Литоисчисление
@tozhe_nauka · 252
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Если быть точным
@tochno_st · 19,605
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 October 2026
Кот Шрёдингера
@kot_sh · 25,261
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
ПостНаука
@postnauka · 22,286
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 September 2026
Рациональные числа
@rationalnumbers · 25,574
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
настенька и графики
@nastengraph · 28,082
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Грамотность на «Меле»
@gramota_mel · 20,079
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Системный Блокъ” (@sysblok), 11,606 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sysblok.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.