Channel
@Gramotarus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
8,164subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001114675385 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Gramotarus |
| Description | Саид Ильясов | Русский язык 📝Просто о сложном от дагестанца @IliasovSM |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 July 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Gramotarus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 8,164 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 8,169 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 8,171 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 8,177 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:20 | 8,182 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 8,182 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 17 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1,525 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 517 | 33.9% | |
| ❤ | 359 | 23.5% | |
| 🔥 | 301 | 19.7% | |
| 🤣 | 126 | 8.26% | |
| 😁 | 108 | 7.08% | |
| 🎉 | 70 | 4.59% | |
| 😱 | 16 | 1.05% | |
| 😢 | 12 | 0.787% | |
| 🤯 | 7 | 0.459% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.262% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.131% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.131% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.066% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,525reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2025 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем привет!🫂 На связи Саид Ильясов. Приглашаю вас на презентацию моей книги «Русский язык. Охота на ошибки»! Расскажу, как создаются книги, поделюсь секретами, которые помогут вам писать и говорить без ошибок. Будет тепло и полезно! 📅 19 июля в 15:00 📍 Москва, ТРЦ «Европейский», «Читай-город» Вход свободный. Обязательно зарегистрируйтесь по ссылке. Жду!✌🏼 @gramotarus
❤53👍7
Давно не выходил на связь здесь. Но сегодня решил заглянуть к вам с хорошей новостью. Моя книга «Русский язык. Охота на ошибки» готова к выходу в свет в издательстве АСТ. Это итог долгого труда, и мне приятно, что издание получилось универсальным: оно будет понятно и полезно читателям любого возраста — и школьникам, и взрослым. В книге я собрал разборы тех случаев, которые чаще всего вызывают трудности. На сайте «Ч…
❤67🔥40👍17💯1
Нужно ли выделять «как обычно» запятыми? Вводное слово «как обычно» обособляется. Снаружи, как обычно, было темно и холодно. Саша, как обычно, не пришёл. Но бывает, что запятые не нужны: если «как обычно» входит в состав сказуемого или тесно связан с ним по смыслу. Ты ведёшь себя как обычно. Его день рождения прошел как обычно. Проверить можно так: к вводным словам можно задать вопрос или убрать их из предложени…
👍58🔥47❤16
@gramotarus
😁75🤣66🔥30❤12👍9😢4
Не путайте!) БронИрованный — от глагола бронИровать, т. е. заказывать, занять. • бронИрованная жилая площадь; • бронИрованный столик. БронирОванный — покрытый бронёй (от глагола бронировАть). • бронирОванный поезд; • бронирОванная дверь. А существительные будут звучать так: бронИрование и бронировАние. @gramotarus
👍100❤30🔥5
Как правильно: не надолго или ненадолго? Есть еще третий вариант написания: не на долго. Последний ошибочный, а первые два зависят от контекста. Сравните: Я ненадолго лягу спать. Я лягу спать не надолго, а всего на пару часов. В общем, если хотите подчеркнуть противопоставление, есть союз «а» или усиливающие отрицание слова (далеко, отнюдь, вовсе, ничуть и т. д.), пишем раздельно: не надолго. А просто рассказать …
👍112❤27
С наступившим Новым годом! Добрых новостей, сладких мандаринов и больше уверенности в завтрашнем дне! Спасибо, что читаете и делитесь с друзьями🎄 @gramotarus
🎉70👍38❤20🥰2
⛔️ Громко кашлянУть ✅ Громко кАшлянуть Во всех словарях даётся только один вариант: кАшлянуть. В других формах ударение тоже падает на первый слог. Она ничего не сказала, а лишь смущенно кАшлянула. Только кАшляни, мама сразу прибежит. Чтобы не забыть, вспоминайте глагол кАшлять. Его трудно сказать по-другому. @gramotarus
👍84❤15🤔4🤯4
Зато две С🤣✌🏼 @gramotarus
🤣60😁33😢8❤4🤯3
Не путай! Причём — союз. Его легко можно заменить словами «к тому же», «вдобавок». Я добиралась до тебя целый час, причём стоя! Саша обиделся, причём справедливо. При чём — предлог и местоимение. Это сочетание часто можно встретить в вопросительных предложениях или в конструкции «ни при чём». При чём здесь он? Моя сестра здесь вообще ни при чём! @gramotarus
🔥91❤24👍2🕊2
Как правильно?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥44👍27😱16❤3
Мне очень приятно, что на сегодняшнем диктанте участвовали люди со всего мира! Спасибо за ваши отзывы!❤️✌🏼 ❗️Всех, кто хочет присоединиться к курсу «Безупречная грамотность», приглашаю. Отпишитесь в комментариях, расскажу про условия в личку.
🔥31❤13
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Gramotarus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как правильно?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2025 to 14 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 391,249 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gramotarus” (@Gramotarus), 8,164 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gramotarus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.