Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OsntTV 📺️

Channel

OsntTV 📺️

@OsntTV

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

45,687subscribers

-1,316 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001554189930
TypeChannel
Username@OsntTV
DescriptionDisclaimer⚠: This Is A 🇮🇳 Channel Which Shares Updates On🛡️Foreign Affairs,📡 Geopolitics & 🛩️ Aviation Twitter : https://x.com/OsintTV
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/OsntTV

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@OsntTV/42670 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC@defencecafe/281596 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC1.001.9 hours
@OsntTV/42681 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC@defencecafe/281797 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC1.0037 minutes
@OsntTV/42693 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC@defencecafe/282029 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC1.0034 minutes
@OsntTV/42704 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC@defencecafe/2821210 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC1.002.4 hours
@OsntTV/42715 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC@defencecafe/2821711 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC1.0016 minutes
@OsntTV/42716 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC@defencecafe/2821811 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC1.0015 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@defencecafe6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0035 minutesthis entry (6–0)
@majormadhankumarmmk40 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0050 minutesthis entry (38–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 463 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

45,68747,00346,3457 August 202610 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net -1,316. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,490–47,200 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 23:5045,687-10
9 Nov 2026, 10:0545,697-12
7 Nov 2026, 23:1645,709-14
6 Nov 2026, 17:5645,723-13
5 Nov 2026, 14:4645,736-24
4 Nov 2026, 13:3545,760-17
3 Nov 2026, 10:5645,777-7
2 Nov 2026, 12:5745,784-19
1 Nov 2026, 09:3945,803-16
31 Oct 2026, 09:4545,819-22
30 Oct 2026, 11:1945,841-14
29 Oct 2026, 14:0945,855-21
28 Oct 2026, 11:4545,876-19
27 Oct 2026, 08:5845,895-13
26 Oct 2026, 11:2745,908-23
25 Oct 2026, 11:2945,931-12
24 Oct 2026, 11:2745,943-17
23 Oct 2026, 14:5145,960-17
22 Oct 2026, 17:4945,977-21
21 Oct 2026, 10:0645,998first reading

Engagement

600 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 194 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.0%
avg views ÷ 45,687 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,930
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 600 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held600 (4 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total290,540
Reactions total6,060
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 00:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,300
Videos
≈707
Links
≈38

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 31m
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 167 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

74,112 reactions across 600 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤15,79721.3%
😁13,98118.9%
🔥10,55614.2%
👏5,6917.68%
🫡5,6187.58%
👍5,2017.02%
😡2,9533.98%
🍌2,4303.28%
😍2,2413.02%
⚡2,1672.92%
🙏2,0552.77%
🥴1,7522.36%
🍾1,4191.91%
✍6850.924%
👌5290.714%
🤝4560.615%
🤷‍♂3160.426%
🤗2650.358%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 600 of the 600 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74,112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 600 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 49 posts held from the last 30 days (18.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 16:46 UTC≈3,680 views77 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁40🫡31❤4🤗1🤷‍♂1

8 Nov 2026, 12:14 UTC≈4,070 views90 reactionsread 11 November 2026

The police said that at about 11:30 am, a joint team of Police Station Kulgam, 09 RR and CRPF 18 BN laid a naka, during which two suspicious persons tried to flee after noticing the naka party but were apprehended. Both persons were apprehended with arms and explosives during joint naka checking in Kulgam on Sunday. During preliminary questioning, they were identified as Muneeb Yaseen Rather and Tahir Bilal, both r…

🔥80❤9🤷‍♂1

8 Nov 2026, 08:30 UTC≈4,370 views118 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Security agencies have released photographs of four active wanted terrorists in Srinagar and appealed to the public to share any credible information regarding their movement or presence.

❤88👍27😡3

8 Nov 2026, 04:26 UTC≈4,190 views162 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Jai Diwali to all our members 🪔

🙏109😍30❤9😁5👍4⚡3🍌2

8 Nov 2026, 02:50 UTC≈3,840 views110 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

The Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) has arrested a wanted Naxalite carrying a reward of ₹10 lakh from the Thakurli area of Thane district. The arrested suspect has been identified as Sanjay Saroj Yadav alias Sanjay Godhare alias Budhram, a resident of Palamu district in Jharkhand. The Jharkhand government had announced a reward of ₹10 lakh for his arrest.

❤77👏27🔥5🍌1

7 Nov 2026, 19:44 UTC≈3,890 views110 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

NIA secures conviction of key accused involved in propagating !&!& ideology, raising funds Accused Dr Adnan Ali Sarkar anaesthesiologist A key accused involved in propagating the ideology of the terror group !&!& and raising funds for terrorist activities has been convicted and sentenced to six years of rigorous imprisonment by an NIA special court in Mumbai. Adnanali Sarkar was convicted of several crimes, includ…

👍76❤22✍4👏4🔥3🥴1

7 Nov 2026, 13:59 UTC≈3,650 views221 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @conflictupdateePhoto

Somewhere on LAC 🇮🇳 🇨🇳 First Banner a polite reminder 😊 Second Banner a clear Warning,FAFO ‼️ 🗿 Pic Credits: Nattysingh

🔥179❤28👏6😍5🍌3

6 Nov 2026, 16:12 UTC≈4,340 views92 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Bandipora Police arrested two more associated with prison linked terror module case registered under FIR No.168/2026 UAPA. The arrested persons were identified as~ 1)Irshad Ahmed Bhat, son of Ghulam Mohammad Bhat, of Chakloo, Baramulla 2)Showkat Ahmed Reshi, son of Ghulam Mohammad Reshi, of Watlab, Sopore.

🔥76❤16

6 Nov 2026, 16:10 UTC≈4,050 views71 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Land Phase of the Tri - Service Electronic Warfare Exercise was conducted successfully to evaluate modern EW tactics. Indian Army, Indian Navy and IAF showcased seamless jointness in contested electromagnetic environment, commanding the spectrum on the battlefield ensuring combat readiness.

🫡56👏9❤5👍1

6 Nov 2026, 16:08 UTC≈3,860 views80 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

EX SARVATRA PRATIGHAT–I A major multi-agency Counter-Terrorism Exercise conducted across 12 locations in Mumbai and Navi Mumbai, led by NSG in coordination with Indian Army, Indian Navy, IAF, ICG, CISF, Maharashtra Police, Maharashtra ATS, Mumbai Police

🫡62🔥18

6 Nov 2026, 15:55 UTC≈3,340 views57 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥57

6 Nov 2026, 11:46 UTC≈3,760 views113 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Acting on specific intelligence inputs, a joint team of Bijapur district police, the 196th battalion of Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and the 204th battalion of the Commando Battalion for Resolute Action (CoBRA- an elite unit of CRPF) launched a search operation. The forest area surrounding the Forward Operating Base (FOB) of security forces in Tadapalla village under Usur police station limits was covered dur…

🔥91❤22

Showing the 12 most recent of 600 posts we hold for @OsntTV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@OsntTV edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
1 September 2026
Most recent edit
7 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @OsntTV as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
1 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
44 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Resonant News 📰
@ResonantNews · 21,612
#1
𝘼𝙧𝙮𝙖𝙫𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙖 𝙐𝙥𝙙𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙨
@AryavartaUpdates · 6,750
#2
teamcharlie9
@TeamCharlie9 · 13
#3
𝗠𝗘𝗚𝗛 𝗨𝗣𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗦
@MeghUpdates · 78,327
#4
Angry Saffron & Treeni
@angrysaffron · 27,007
#5
Grandmasters of Geopolitics
@geo_grandmasters · 76,103
#6
Diplomatic Talk
@Diplomatic_Talk · 33,190
#7
Politics UnTold
@PoliticsUntold · 25,250
#8
INDIAN MILITARY NEWS
@indianmilitarynews · 14,337
#9
Diplomatic Delta
@diplomatic_delta · 14,693
#10
360 Degrees
@ThreeSixtyDegrees · 16,457
#11
Voice of india🛕🚩
@bharat_voice · 8,285
#12
Asia Brief
@asiabrief · 13,487
#13
Defence Squad
@DSquadOfficial · 82,157
#14
That's Haram Bro!
@ThatsHaramBro · 2,151
#15
DD Geopolitics
@DDGeopolitics · 189,932
#16
𝐌𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐤
@mediacrook · 831
#17
Major Madhan Kumar MMK
@majormadhankumarmmk · 30,570
#18
Rashtriya Rifles
@rashtriya_rifles · 4,531
#19
Arun Pudur (Official)
@ArunPudurTelegram · 2,241
#20
Hindustani Beast
@Hindustanibeast · 6,570
#21
Bhaarat Kshetra- Dr Shah
@bharatkshetra · 3,830
#22
The Alternate Media_Gayatri Devi
@AlternateMedia_GayatriDevi · 7,164
#23
Youth Against Terror ™
@YouthAgainstTerror · 3,263
#24
Indian Military Updates
@IndianMilitaryUpdates · 11,056
#25
NEWS FRONT KASHMIR(کشمیر)
@kashmirnews247 · 1,172
#26
HinduPost
@hindupost · 1,329
#27
Treeni
@TheTreeni · 3,345
#28
The Jaipur Dialogues
@thejaipurdialogues · 9,213
#29
War Noir
@war_noir · 53,423
#30
Gharkekalesh
@gharkekaleshh · 72,772
#31
PGurus
@pgurus1 · 3,669
#32
IROP
@IROP_tele · 15,899
#33
Panchjanya
@epanchjanya · 5,750
#34
🎧 CJ Onfrab🔊🎼 (Official)
@Onfrabmusic · 47,108
#35
ऑपइंडिया - Opindia hindi🔥
@WeSupportOpIndia · 1,938
#36
INTEL SAGE 🇮🇳 (Intel Monk)
@IntelSage · 13,645
#37
Indian Development News 🇮🇳
@DevelopmentNewsIndia · 21,993
#38
Angry Saffron । Dharma
@angrysaffrondharma · 5,753
#39
Geopolitics Prime
@geopolitics_prime · 288,925
#40
War & Gore Global
@LACarchives · 10,766
#41
Political Kida
@politicalkida · 4,866
#42
Agenda Buster (Uncensored)
@Starboy2079 · 8,572
#43
Warhorizon
@warhorizon · 909
#44
Politics Zone (India)
@PoliticsZonee · 14,714
#45
For The Berets
@fortheberets · 1,967
#46
BhikhuMhatre @MumbaichaDon (Being Informed)
@beinginformed1 · 2,681
#47
Pakistan Untold
@Pakistan_Untold · 2,493
#48
Intel Slava
@intelslava · 385,509
#49
AlphaDefense Original
@AlphaDefense01 · 5,187
#50
Ashwini Shrivastava
@AshwiniSahaya · 5,045
#51
Kashmir Disinfo Lab
@kashmirdisinfolab · 936
#52
Middle East Spectator — MES
@middle_east_spectator · 396,815
#53
Intel Republic
@Intel_Republic12 · 94,311
#54
GLOBAL NEWS NEXUS
@gnntelegram · 3,175
#55
War Monitor
@warmonitors · 150,433
#56
Slavyangrad
@Slavyangrad · 111,582
#57
Hananya Naftali - Israel News
@hnaftali · 117,998
#58
Bellum Acta - Intel, Urgent News and Archives ✝️ #FreeVenezuela
@BellumActaNews · 107,046
#59
Def-Talks by Aadi
@deftalksaadi · 5,044
#60
𝗚𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝗰𝗲𝗻𝗲𝘀🌍
@global_scenes · 4,049
#61
/CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global
@CIG_telegram · 114,525
#62
Toxic Masculinity
@men_at_war · 10,280
#63
Gems Of Indology 🦣
@gemsofindology · 2,303
#64
Bebo’s Friends
@myLordBebo · 72,026
#65
RT Documentary
@militarywave · 41,253
#66
DEFENCE CAFE - News 🗞
@defencecafe · 5,054
#67
Olive kshatrani
@olivekshatrani · 3,987
#68

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Resonant News 📰
@ResonantNews · 21,612
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 September 2026
Major Madhan Kumar MMK
@majormadhankumarmmk · 30,570
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 7 September 2026
Defence Squad
@DSquadOfficial · 82,157
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 18 August 2026
Gharkekalesh
@gharkekaleshh · 72,772
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 19 August 2026
Angry Saffron & Treeni
@angrysaffron · 27,007
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 11 September 2026
𝗠𝗘𝗚𝗛 𝗨𝗣𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗦
@MeghUpdates · 78,327
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
Politics UnTold
@PoliticsUntold · 25,250
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 15 September 2026
ALL DEFENCE BOOKS LIBRARY
@NDA_CDS_AFCAT_SSB_Book_PDF_Notes · 29,990
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 8 September 2026
Bitcoin Alpha Zone 💱
@BitcoinAlphaZone · 33,462
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 2 September 2026
SSB Future Officers
@ssbgeneraldiscussion · 31,019
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 6 September 2026
Grandmasters of Geopolitics
@geo_grandmasters · 76,103
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
Prashant Dhawan Sir Official✅
@DhawanSir · 136,689
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
Road to Recommendation
@ssbclear · 23,320
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 18 September 2026
Ankit Agrawal Official
@ankitagrawalofficial · 51,637
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 24 August 2026
Indian Development News 🇮🇳
@DevelopmentNewsIndia · 21,993
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 September 2026
CAPF AC MENTORS ™ ©
@Capfacmentors · 23,190
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 September 2026
Chak De
@kdcampuschakde · 19,608
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 30 September 2026
Gaurav Pradhan Gurukul 🇮🇳
@DGPIndia · 90,335
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
Hindustan Times- Official Channel
@hindustantimes · 62,778
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
MyGov Newsdesk
@MyGovCoronaNewsdesk · 366,387
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
Hananya Naftali - Israel News
@hnaftali · 117,998
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
RAGE X - Intelligence | War
@rageintel · 20,035
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 September 2026
AntiFakeNews
@yourantifakenews · 19,203
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 October 2026

This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OsntTV 📺️” (@OsntTV), 45,687 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OsntTV.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.