Ghaziabad Blast: Terror group named Tehreek Ul Mujahidin Hindustan claims responsibility.

Channel
INTEL SAGE 🇮🇳 (Intel Monk)
@IntelSage
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,645subscribers
-2,784 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001429889467 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IntelSage |
| Description | #ForIndiaAnything 🇮🇳 (Managed By Team Intel Monk) |
| Created | 10 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 66 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IntelSage |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 08:09 | 13,645 | -3 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 22:00 | 13,648 | -1 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 11:08 | 13,649 | -5 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:07 | 13,654 | -8 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:46 | 13,662 | -2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:51 | 13,664 | -8 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:59 | 13,672 | -11 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:55 | 13,683 | -1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:56 | 13,684 | +1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:58 | 13,683 | -46 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:10 | 13,729 | -15 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:16 | 13,744 | -2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 13,746 | -10 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:40 | 13,756 | -10 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:30 | 13,766 | -12 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:10 | 13,778 | -6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:41 | 13,784 | -23 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:16 | 13,807 | -35 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:41 | 13,842 | -45 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 06:46 | 13,887 | first reading |
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 13.4%
- avg views ÷ 13,645 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,830
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (31 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,830 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 07:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,050
- Videos
- ≈647
- Links
- ≈97
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 13m 29s
- Average length
- 58s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
With you, Delhi Police ! Screw these fraudulent feminists and their simps, irrespective of their gender.
PRESS CONFERENCE SUMMARY: - Hyderabad police arrested eight people in connection with the theft of arms and ammunition from the 20 Battalion Madras Regiment at Bollarum, uncovered on August 31, 2026. - The prime accused, identified in the accused list as retired army jawan Havildar Upputholla Mallesh alias Raju, was arrested on September 11. - Police said the stolen weapons were recovered from his father’s residen…
Secunderabad Cantt Weapons Theft Case: After a month of relentless effort and sleepless nights, the Telangana Police, Hyderabad Task Force, and State Intelligence concludes the investigation. Total 8 accused have been arrested: - 01 Main accused Mallesh - 03 from the Army - 02 weapon dealers from Kolkata - 02 Mallesh friends from his village Hyderabad CP to address the press conference at 1400 hours.
Army JAWAN Mallesh held a grudge against his seniors for “forcing” him into early retirement on June 30 this year. A resident of Mahbubnagar, Mallesh joined the Army in 2010 and served for 16 years before being compulsorily retired over disciplinary and health issues. Army JAWAN Mallesh went around 11 pm on the night of 30 August, and stole arms and ammunition from the Kote room and magazine room of the 20th Battal…
Mallesh was summoned for questioning but did not appear. Police and state intelligence then explained the seriousness of the case to his wife and father-in-law. While on her way to the police station, his wife called him and questioned him. He told her about the arms. She informed her father, who alerted the police. Bolarum Police, Hyderabad Task Force, Malkajgiri SOT and Telangana State Intelligence tracked him …
More than 100 people were questioned, while call data records of over 8.5 lakh mobile numbers were analyzed during the investigation.
Some more footages
Intel Sage Exclusive: Retd fauji Sepoy Mallesh from Mahabubnagar, Telangana was involved in the weapons theft. He retired from the army two months back.
Secunderabad Cantt Weapon Theft Case! Indian Military Intelligence, Southern Command and Telangana Police gets a breakthrough. All missing weapons have been recovered. Jai Hind 🇮🇳
Exact moment!
Indian High Commissioner to Bangladesh Dinesh Trivedi met PM Modi, a day after he met Bangladesh PM Tarique Rahman.
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @IntelSage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @IntelSage as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 20 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MeghUpdates · 78,327
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
@ResonantNews · 21,612
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 September 2026
@DevelopmentNewsIndia · 21,993
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 September 2026
@PoliticsUntold · 25,250
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 15 September 2026
@majormadhankumarmmk · 30,570
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 7 September 2026
@DSquadOfficial · 82,157
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 18 August 2026
@geo_grandmasters · 76,103
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
@gharkekaleshh · 72,772
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 19 August 2026
@DGPIndia · 90,335
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
@angrysaffron · 27,007
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 11 September 2026
@MyGovCoronaNewsdesk · 366,387
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@NDA_CDS_AFCAT_SSB_Book_PDF_Notes · 29,990
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 8 September 2026
@hindustantimes · 62,778
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
@ignourcdelhi3 · 39,451
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 31 August 2026
@OsntTV · 45,687
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 August 2026
@thenewindianexpress · 21,002
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
@ssbgeneraldiscussion · 31,019
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 6 September 2026
@danishsir_defencewallah · 44,642
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 28 August 2026
@ssbclear · 23,320
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 18 September 2026
@allahabaduniversitylive · 24,722
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 14 September 2026
@aakariasofficial · 30,495
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 September 2026
@DhawanSir · 136,689
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
@GATEWallahMechanicalengineering · 38,645
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 1 September 2026
@yourantifakenews · 19,203
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 October 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“INTEL SAGE 🇮🇳 (Intel Monk)” (@IntelSage), 13,645 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IntelSage.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.