Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 360 Degrees

Channel

360 Degrees

@ThreeSixtyDegrees

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,457subscribers

-242 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001603287999
TypeChannel
Username@ThreeSixtyDegrees
DescriptionNews Views and Analysis Our Youtube Channel - https://youtube.com/@360degreesNVA Channel Owner FB profile - https://www.facebook.com/manishsharma4u?mibextid=ZbWKwL Twitter - https://twitter.com/360Degreesnva?t=dgTt_r-GthjyH_4-U5lEuA&s=09
CreatedBetween 1 November 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ThreeSixtyDegrees

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ThreeSixtyDegrees/37802 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 04:53 UTC@MeghUpdates/1292419 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC1.0068 minutes
@MeghUpdates/1292389 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC@ThreeSixtyDegrees/37804 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC1.004 minutes
@ThreeSixtyDegrees/37847 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC@MeghUpdates/12942911 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC1.002.4 hours
@MeghUpdates/12965315 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC@ThreeSixtyDegrees/37899 · this entry15 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC1.0047 minutes
@MeghUpdates/12967415 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC@ThreeSixtyDegrees/37901 · this entry15 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC1.0032 minutes
@MeghUpdates/13013022 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC@ThreeSixtyDegrees/38008 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC1.003 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@MeghUpdates6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0040 minutes@MeghUpdates (4–2)
@DevelopmentNewsIndia5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.952.3 hours@DevelopmentNewsIndia (4–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 8 of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 355 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

16,45316,70016,576.516,4577 August 20269 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 94 days, net -242. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,416–16,737 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 19:4116,457+4
8 Nov 2026, 07:4616,453-15
7 Nov 2026, 03:0716,468+1
5 Nov 2026, 23:4116,467-8
5 Nov 2026, 02:4916,475-7
4 Nov 2026, 01:0716,482+4
2 Nov 2026, 23:1016,478+1
2 Nov 2026, 00:3916,477+3
1 Nov 2026, 00:1916,474-10
31 Oct 2026, 00:4916,484-7
30 Oct 2026, 00:4616,491-2
28 Oct 2026, 21:2816,493-8
27 Oct 2026, 17:1516,501+9
26 Oct 2026, 20:0816,492-3
25 Oct 2026, 18:3816,495-5
24 Oct 2026, 16:0416,500+4
23 Oct 2026, 18:0616,496-12
22 Oct 2026, 16:3116,508-6
21 Oct 2026, 13:5616,514+12
20 Oct 2026, 10:1416,502first reading

Engagement

511 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 16,457 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,920
115 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
115
of 511 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held511 (6 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total220,283
Reactions total15,025
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 06:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈23,700
Videos
≈3,670
Links
≈1,030

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 16m
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 79 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

62,283 reactions across 510 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤19,49531.3%
👍17,69328.4%
🤣5,3958.66%
🔥4,2696.85%
👏3,8336.15%
💯2,8184.52%
😁2,6854.31%
🙏1,8863.03%
🤬1,4722.36%
🥰5870.942%
🤔3010.483%
🫡2990.48%
😱2840.456%
👎2130.342%
⚡2000.321%
👌1250.201%
🎉1230.197%
🤪1210.194%
🌚840.135%
🍾780.125%
22 further kinds3220.517%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 510 of the 511 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62,283 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 511 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 511 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ThreeSixtyDegrees. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 511 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 115 posts held from the last 30 days (9.57%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 05:22 UTC480 views47 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Mohammad Sharif, convicted in the 2008 Rampur CRPF camp attack case, was shot dead by unidentified men in Rampur, Uttar Pradesh, on Tuesday. He was rushed to hospital but succumbed to his injuries.

❤42👏3😁2

11 Nov 2026, 04:56 UTC625 views39 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

'भगवान राम ने सीता को त्यागा, मैं राम मंदिर नहीं जाऊंगा', बोले TMC सांसद कीर्ति आजाद Comments Please.

🤬37🥰2

11 Nov 2026, 04:54 UTC629 views47 reactionsread 11 November 2026

दिपावली के बाद अच्छी खबर यह है कि चाहे दिपावली के पटाखे से फैला प्रदूषण रहा हो अथवा पंजाब में पराली का धुंआ, सब पुरबा हवा के प्रभाव से तेजी से पाकिस्तान की तरफ जा रहा है, कल शाम से ही पाकिस्तान के विभिन्न शहरों में वायु प्रदूषण चरम पर देखने को मिल रहा है जबकि भारत में पूरब से आने वाली ठंडी हवाओं ने यहां के मौसम को धीरे धीरे साफ़ करना शुरू कर दिया है।

😁35👍11🤣1

11 Nov 2026, 04:19 UTC790 views72 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥51👍16👏3❤2

11 Nov 2026, 03:52 UTC915 views51 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

करीब 88% मुस्लिम आबादी वाले इंडोनेशिया में भी भारत के कॉक्रोच जैसा आंदोलन शुरू हो गया है । प्रदर्शन के कुछ प्रमुख मुद्दे हैं 👇 महंगाई और जीवनयापन का खर्च: बढ़ती कीमतों को लेकर युवाओं में नाराजगी। बेरोजगारी और आर्थिक चिंताएँ: सरकार की आर्थिक नीतियों पर सवाल। पर्यावरण: जंगलों और पीटलैंड में लगी आग को लेकर सरकार के खिलाफ प्रदर्शन। महिलाओं के अधिकार: महिलाओं के अधिकारों और सरकारी नीतियों के विरोध में प्रदर्शन। सरकारी जवा…

👍42🤔8❤1

11 Nov 2026, 03:36 UTC937 views75 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

कांग्रेस वालों को हिन्दू त्यौहारों का मजाक उड़ाना है.... और फिर चुनाव के समय ये कहते हैं कि EVM हैक हो गई है

👍63❤4🤬4💯2🥰2

10 Nov 2026, 19:24 UTC≈1,370 views92 reactionsread 11 November 2026

सोनिया गांधी जी की जो किताब आई है, उसमें उन्होंने सिखों के कत्लेआम के मामले में अपने परिवार को Self Clean Chit देने की कोशिश की है। किताब में उन्होंने लिखा है कि 31 अक्टूबर की रात को राजीव गांधी ने आर्मी चीफ जनरल वैद्य से कहा कि सेना को बुलाया जाए। इस पर जनरल वैद्य ने खुद यह फैसला लिया कि दिल्ली के आसपास जो सेना तैनात है, वह सिख रेजिमेंट है, इसलिए सिख सेना को नहीं बुलाया जाना चाहिए। उन्होंने दिल्ली से दूर देहरादून औ…

👍80🤔7❤5

10 Nov 2026, 18:35 UTC≈1,450 views181 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Kangana hits the nail on the coffin.😄

👍107💯49🔥17❤7🤣1

10 Nov 2026, 16:54 UTC≈1,570 views118 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Up CRPF कैंप अटैक वाले मोहम्मद शरीफ को अज्ञात हमलावर ने गोली मार दी ,8 जवान शहीद हुए थे उस वक़्त डिटेल्स नहीं लिखूंगा मगर कई लोग कन्फ्यूजन में हैं और थे लेकिन कई लोग जानबूझकर शाह और योगी वाली थ्योरी पर अभी भी झगड़ा पैदा कर रहें हैं लेकिन पिछले दिनों हुई मुलाकात के बाद साफ है HM अपने रोल में वापिस आ चुके हैं , यूपी में बहुत सी राजनीतिक ,सामाजिक ,जातीय तथा सबसे महत्वपूर्ण प्रशासनिक अव्यवस्थाओं के बाद ये दोबारा हो रहा है…

👏73❤22👍15🔥7😁1

10 Nov 2026, 16:41 UTC≈1,560 views141 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

पिछले साल 10 नवंबर को दिल्ली के लाल किले के सामने Bomb Blast हुआ था... जिसमे 15 लोग मारे गए थे और 20 घायल हुए थे. कहने को यह एक local आतंकी संगठन (जिसमे एक कॉलेज के डॉक्टर्स शामिल थे) का काम था.... लेकिन आज कल कोई भी आतंकी घटना ऐसे ही नहीं होती. उसके पीछे ढेरों लोग होते हैं. आपको यह जान कर आश्चर्य हो सकता है.... कि इस आतंकी घटना के लिए 300 से ज्यादा लोगों को गिरफ्तार किया गया... और 73 अपराधियों को विदेश से पकड़ कर …

👍106💯30❤5

10 Nov 2026, 16:22 UTC≈1,570 views133 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

सोनिया विहार घाट से 'नमो यमुना रिवर सफारी' का भव्य शुभारंभ. जो सपने में भी नहीं सोचा था... आज सच हुआ 👍👍

👏92👍27❤14

Showing the 12 most recent of 511 posts we hold for @ThreeSixtyDegrees. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Gaurav Pradhan Gurukul 🇮🇳
@DGPIndia · 90,335
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
Hindustan- Hindi Official Channel
@Hindustan · 19,143
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 October 2026
Indian Development News 🇮🇳
@DevelopmentNewsIndia · 21,993
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 September 2026
Politics UnTold
@PoliticsUntold · 25,250
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 15 September 2026
Resonant News 📰
@ResonantNews · 21,612
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 September 2026
MyGov Newsdesk
@MyGovCoronaNewsdesk · 366,129
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
Major Madhan Kumar MMK
@majormadhankumarmmk · 30,570
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 7 September 2026
OsntTV 📺️
@OsntTV · 45,687
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 August 2026
Prashant Dhawan Sir Official✅
@DhawanSir · 136,689
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
Defence Squad
@DSquadOfficial · 82,114
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 18 August 2026
Angry Saffron & Treeni
@angrysaffron · 27,007
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 11 September 2026
𝗠𝗘𝗚𝗛 𝗨𝗣𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗦
@MeghUpdates · 78,327
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
Hindustan Times- Official Channel
@hindustantimes · 62,778
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
Grandmasters of Geopolitics
@geo_grandmasters · 76,097
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
Speedy Current Affairs 2026 PDF
@onlymagazinepdf · 52,756
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 24 August 2026
AntiFakeNews
@yourantifakenews · 19,203
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 October 2026
Geeta press books
@geetapressbooks · 20,310
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 September 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“360 Degrees” (@ThreeSixtyDegrees), 16,457 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ThreeSixtyDegrees.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.