Channel
@fiqhal3laqat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
38,692subscribers
+36 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001529213813 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fiqhal3laqat |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fiqhal3laqat |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:39 | 38,692 | +15 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 38,677 | +4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 38,673 | +22 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 38,651 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 38,653 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 38,658 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 38,665 | -15 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 38,680 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:40 | 38,678 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 38,669 | +8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 38,661 | +5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:20 | 38,656 | first reading |
39 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (24 July 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 284,796 |
| Reactions total | 6,553 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,772 reactions across 36 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5,061 | 87.7% | |
| 👍 | 318 | 5.51% | |
| 🥰 | 109 | 1.89% | |
| 👏 | 78 | 1.35% | |
| 😢 | 63 | 1.09% | |
| 👌 | 51 | 0.884% | |
| 🕊 | 30 | 0.52% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 0.347% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 0.173% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 0.121% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 0.104% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 0.104% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 0.104% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 0.069% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 0.052% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,553reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fiqhal3laqat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
كلنا بنتمنى إن لما يكون المود بتاعنا مش مظبوط بسبب الشغل أو أي أزمة أو موقف، أو التغير الهرموني اللي بيحصل لبعض السيدات أثناء فترة البيريود أو الحمل والولادة، نتمنى وقتها إن شريك حياتنا يحتوينا ويتفهم إن انفعالنا سببه ظرف استثنائي مش أكتر، وإنه يتغافل عن الكلام اللي بنقوله وقت الغضب. فعشان تعشم في شريك حياتك العشم ده، لازم يكون في شروط: ١- إن غضبك اللي بيحصل ده فعلاً غصب عنك، وبيحصل كل فترة، وإن الأصل إنك مهذب ولس…
❤46👍3
قِيل في معنى الزَّواج: أن تختار من يستحقُّ الاطلاع على عيُوبكَ، فيَقبلها ثم يسترها. - الرّافعي #مودة_ورحمة فقه العلاقات: تليجرام | فيسبوك | واتساب
❤175🥰23😢6👏4❤🔥3👌3👍2
س/ لو سمحت يا شيخنا، المودة والرحمة اللي ربنا حكا عليها ايمتى بتجي؟ إذا كنت أنا دعيت دعاء الاستخارة وما ارتحت للشخص أبداً مع انو سمعته حلوة، هل صحيح المودة والرحمة بتجي بعد الزواج؟ كيف إذا كنت أنا هلأ مو متخيلة انو ممكن يمسك ايدي ومو مرتاحة؟ وهل فعلاً انا آثمة لو رفضتو وذنبي التكبر؟ انا والله مو هيك😭 ج/ لا لا تأثمين ولو الموضوع فيه نفور يبقى اقعدي مع نفسك أولا حاولي تحددي سبب النفور بصراحة لو فيه سبب منطقي يمكن حله …
❤72👍3👌2
ومن أعظمِ ما يفتحُ على النفسِ أبوابَ الوساوسِ والهمومِ فراغُها؛ فإنَّ القلبَ إذا لم يُشغلْه صاحبُه بما ينفعُه، شغلَه بما يضرُّه. وكثيرٌ من الناسِ لا يُتعبُهم الواقعُ بقدرِ ما تُتعبُهم خواطرُ صنعوها لأنفسِهم. فاشغلْ وقتَك بعلمٍ أو عملٍ أو عبادةٍ، فإنَّ النفسَ إن لم تحملْها إلى الخير، حملتْك هي إلى ما لا خيرَ فيه. - سعيد قديح #خبايا_النفوس فقه العلاقات: تليجرام | فيسبوك | واتساب | يوتيوب
❤184👍8🕊7❤🔥1
إحدى الركائز الكبرى لبناء العلاقات وتثبيتها: تأمين المخاوف. يدخلُ الإنسانُ العلاقة؛ وفي نفسه تساؤلات يلتمس لها جوابًا؛ ومخاوفَ يبتغي لها أمانًا.. أن تقرأ ما في نفس الآخر من مخاوف؛ فتبث في نفسه الأمان.. تلك دعامة كبرى لهذه العلاقة. لما تقدم النبي ﷺ لأم سلمة سردت عليها تساؤلاتها ومخاوف نفسها، فقالت: «1) ولكني امرأة في غيرة شديدة فأخاف أن ترى مني شيئا يعذبني الله به، 2) وأنا امرأة قد دخلت في السن، 3) وأنا ذات عيال».…
❤175👍7😢7🥰3🕊2👏1
أحب أن تكون نظرة الإنسان إلى نفسه نظرة فيها شموخ وتعالٍ، أن يضع نفسه من نفسه في منزلة رفيعة، ألا يرضى بما يستنقصه ويهينه، إن من أرفع المروءات، أن يحرص الإنسان على أن يكون فاضلا أمام نفسه.. على أن يكون هذا التعالي داخليا، شعور خاص يبقيه الإنسان بينه وبين ذاته، ولا يتحول إلى مقام تفاخر وغطرسة أمام الآخرين.. بل قد نلاحظ هنا مفارقة، غالبا إجلال النفس ينتهي بالإنسان إلى التواضع والبساطة، بينما التباهي والكبر هو في حقي…
❤172👌11👏11👍6💔2
🔹 مالك تخنتي كده ليه؟ ... وشك مصفر ليه؟ ده أنا لما كنت قدك، كنت بطبخ وأغسل الأطباق وأغسل الهدوم وأنشرها وأرتب الشقة في ١٧ دقيقة. إنتِ ليه بتنامي بعد ما ينزل جوزك للشغل؟ الست المفروض تصحى من الفجر، ما تنامش تاني إلا يوم القيامة. الكلام ده لما بيتقال لواحدة قصاد زوجها بيبقى سخيف جدًا، في ناس مش عارفة إن الكلام ده ممكن يخلي زوج ما يبقاش راضي عن زوجته بعد ما كان شايف إن مفيش مشكلة. أو 🔹 هو إنتِ جوزك ما جابش هدية ليك…
❤151👍13👌12😁6🥰3🔥2❤🔥1
واحدةٌ مِن أطيب آلاء الصُحبة الشّافِية هي.. أن ينكشف المرءُ عاريَ الروح أمام صاحبه، بجروحه و عيوبه، و وَصماته و خيباته؛ فيُدثِّره الأخير بسِتار قبوله. - إسلام النادي #الحب #مودة_ورحمة فقه العلاقات: تليجرام | فيسبوك | واتساب | يوتيوب
❤233😢15👍8👏6👎1
من المعتقدات الغلط فى الجواز إنك تقول (أنا هتجوزه هو مش هتجوز عيلته) فى الحقيقة الأسرة ليها تأثير كبير ولازم تاخد بالك منه قبل ما تختار 1- الحد اللى أنت هتاخده ده بالفعل نشأ فى الأسرة دى يعنى غالبًا واخد جزء من طباعهم سواء الحلوة او الوحشة 2- ممكن تأثير الأسرة السلبى يمتد لبيتك عن طريق الزن والكلام الكتير والحوارات وخصوصا لو أبنهم أو بنتهم شخصيته ضعيفة 3- فى كل الأحوال دول هيكونوا قرايب أولادك واكيد هيكون ليهم دور…
❤122😢15👍14👌5
شكلك من بتوع زوجي قرة عيني وأطفالي سر وجودي ومابتعمليش حاجة في حياتك إلا المطبخ والمواعين وعايمة في البامبرز وعاملالنا فيها مثقفة ج / لا والله أنا مش منهم وماقدرش أكون منهم عشان بيملكوا حاجة مش عندي، انتي عارفة محتاجة قد ايه شجاعة وانكار ذات عشان تحطي عمرك ووقتك وصحتك في شيء مش هايجيبلك عائد مادي ولا مجد شخصي وربما كمان محدش يحسسك بالامتنان ويقولك شكراً؟ في المعارك والثورات دايماً بيكون الجنود المغمورين أكثر شجاعة …
❤152👍8👏8😢7
س/ لما أدور علي زوجه.. أدور علي صفات ايه؟ وايه دورها و واجباتها في الاسره ج/ حضرتك عايز تتجوز ليه؟ تصورك لحياتك بعد الزواج شكله ايه ((تصور واقعي بعيد عن المثاليات النادرة)) أولوياتك اللي متقدرش تفرط فيها أو تتنازل عنها في حياتك الزوجية ايه؟ جاوب الأسئلة دي مع نفسك وابني على أساسها معاييرك للزوجة اللي تناسبك س/ عاوز أتجوز علشان الرغبة الجنسية فطرة الله التي فطرنا عليها، ثانيا علشان يكون هنا إنسانة تكون سكن ليا، وأ…
❤88👍12
📌 دورة: " ثابتات" في زمن الفتن للدكتور أسامة زيدان (دورة مجانية) 10 أسرار تحفظ قلبك من السقوط في زمن الفتن 1. لماذا يسقطن في منتصف الطريق؟ لأن البداية سهلة... لكن الثبات يحتاج إلى قلب يعرف أسباب السقوط قبل أن يسقط. 2. هل يمكن لدعاء واحد أن ينقذ قلبك؟ تعلمي لماذا كان النبي ﷺ يكثر من سؤال الله الثبات، وكيف تجعلين الدعاء حصنًا لقلبك. 3. إيمانك يُسرق منك... فهل تشعرين؟ قد لا يأتي ضعف الإيمان فجأة؛ أحيانًا يتسلل إليكِ…
❤46👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @fiqhal3laqat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@fiqhal3laqat edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 49,952 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فقه العلاقات” (@fiqhal3laqat), 38,692 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fiqhal3laqat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.