11 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTC69 viewsread 12 August 2026
اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي تَبَرَّأْتُ مِنْ حَوْلِي وَقُوَّتِي، وَاعْتَصَمْتُ بِحَوْلِكَ وَقُوَّتِكَ، فَلَا حَوْلَ وَلَا قُوَّةَ إِلَّا بِكَ.
Channel
قَنَاة | عَلَىٰ نَهْجِ أَهْلِ الأَثَـرِ.
@athaar28
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,188subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001800893768 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @athaar28 |
| Description | وَلَنْ نَضِلَّ مَا تَمَسْكَنَا بِالأَثَر. [فوائِد وآثَار مَنقُولة] |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/athaar28 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 5,188 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 5,192 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 5,196 | first reading |
Engagement
56 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.85%
- avg views ÷ 5,188 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 252
- 56 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 56
- of 56 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 56 (3 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,092 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,340
- Videos
- ≈229
- Links
- ≈341
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
11 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC105 viewsread 12 August 2026
قال الإمام الآجري -رحمه اللّٰه-: "من صفة الجاهل: الجدل، والمراء، والمغالبة." [أخلاق العلماء صـ 63].
11 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC154 viewsread 12 August 2026
قال ابن سيرين : "إني لأرى المرأة في منامي فأعلم أنها لا تحل لي، فأصرف بصري" فقال احدهم: ليت عقلي في اليقظة كعقل ابن سيرين في المنام.
11 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC164 viewsread 12 August 2026
"(وَ) يُكْرَهُ السَّلَامُ (عَلَى تَالٍ) لِلْقُرْآنِ وَعَلَى (ذَاكِرٍ) لِلَّهِ تَعَالَى وَعَلَى (مُلَبٍّ وَمُحَدِّثٍ) أَيْ: مُلْقٍ لِحَدِيثِ النَّبِيِّ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - (وَخَطِيبٍ وَوَاعِظِ وَعَلَى مَنْ يَسْتَمِعُ لَهُمْ) أَيْ: لِلْمَذْكُورِينَ مِنْ التَّالِي وَمَنْ بَعْدَهُ وَيُكْرَهُ السَّلَامُ عَلَى (مُكَرِّرِ فِقْهٍ وَمُدَرِّسٍ) فِي أَيِّ عِلْمٍ كَانَ وَلَعَلَّ الْمُرَادَ إذَا كَانَ مَشْرُوعًا…
11 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC182 viewsread 12 August 2026
قال حماد الأنصاري: «إن النووي أشعري والسبب في هذا أنه لم يشتغل بكتب السلف في العقيدة كما اشتغل في فقه الفروع». [المجموع في ترجمة حماد الأنصاري (2/ 750)] لم تبدعون الزمخشري وبشر المريسي وحسين الكرابيسي والثلجي وعمرو بن عبيد ومعبد الجهني وابن أبي دؤاد؟ أليسوا مجتهدين أرادوا الحق فلم يصيبوه فحسب وغلطهم ذائب في بحور حسناتهم؟ لم تبدعونهم وتكفرونهم يا حدادية يا طعنة العلماء أئمة الإسلام والمسلمين؟
11 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC194 viewsread 12 August 2026
إن معرفة الله ومعرفة أسمائه الحسنى وصفاته العليا هي غاية مطالب البرية، وهي أفضل العلوم وأعلاها، وأشرفها وأسماها، وهي الغاية التي شمَّر إليها المشمرون، وتنافس فيها المتنافسون، وجرى إليها المتسابقون، وإلى نحوها تمتد الأعناق، وإليها تتجه القلوب الصحيحة بالأشواق، وبها يتحقق للعبد طيب الحياة، "فإن حياة الإنسان بحياة قلبه وروحه، ولا حياة لقلبه إلا بمعرفة فاطره ومحبته وعبادته وحده والإنابة إليه والطمأنينة بذكره والأُنس بقرب…
11 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC200 viewsread 12 August 2026
فاشتغال العبد بمعرفة أسماء الله وصفاته اشتغال بما خُلق له العبد، وتركه وتضييعه إهمال لما خلق له، ولا ينبغي لعبد فَضْلُ الله عليه عظيم ونعمه عليه متوالية أن يكون جاهلا بربه معرضًا عن معرفته سبحانه. - فقه الأسماء الحسنى.
10 Aug 2026, 21:49 UTC230 viewsread 12 August 2026
قَالَ ابْنُ القَيِّمِ: «وَكَمْ تَرَى مِنْ رَجُلٍ مُتَوَرِّعٍ عَنِ الْفَوَاحِشِ وَالظُّلْمِ، وَلِسَانُهُ يَفْرِي فِي أَعْرَاضِ الْأَحْيَاءِ وَالْأَمْوَاتِ، وَلَا يُبَالِي مَا يَقُولُ» [الجواب الكافي]
10 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC246 viewsread 12 August 2026
قال سفيان الثوري رحمه الله:"كان المال فيما مضى يُكره، فأما اليوم فهو تُرسُ المؤمن."
10 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC259 viewsread 12 August 2026
قَالَ الْحَسَنُ: «لَا يَزالُ الْعَبْدُ بِخَيْر مَا إِذَا قَالَ ؛قَالَ لِلَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ، وَإِذَا عَمِلَ عَمِلَ لِلَّهِ» [الزهد للإمام أحمد]
10 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC282 viewsread 12 August 2026
قال وهب بن منبه : رءوس النعم ثلاث ، فأولها نعمة الإسلام التي لا تتم نعمة إلا بها ، والثانية نعمة العافية التي لا تطيب الحياة إلا بها ، والثالثة نعمة الغنى التي لا يتم العيش إلا بها.
10 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC283 viewsread 12 August 2026
عن عبد الله بن عمر رضي الله عنه قال: "كلُّ بدعةِ ضلالةٍ وإن رآها النَّاسُ حَسنةً." [الإبانة الكبرى لابن بطة]
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @athaar28. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 691,037 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قَنَاة | عَلَىٰ نَهْجِ أَهْلِ الأَثَـرِ.” (@athaar28), 5,188 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/athaar28.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.