Channel
@fenchacaij
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
273,144subscribers
-2,496 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001515857362 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fenchacaij |
| Description | 接快讯，商务合作联系 @Cindy88888 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fenchacaij |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 273,144 | -384 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:41 | 273,528 | -622 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 274,150 | -640 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 274,790 | -560 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 275,350 | -290 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 275,640 | first reading |
62 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 62 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 62 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 42,383 |
| Reactions total | 38 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
38 reactions across 28 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 55.3% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 44.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【澳大利亚监管机构关闭数字资产平台 Yepbit，否认冻结其用户资金】 澳大利亚证券投资委员会（ASIC）宣布已关闭数字资产平台 Yepbit 多个网站，并警告用户不要与该平台交易。ASIC 收到多位投资者报告称无法从该平台提取资金。Yepbit 声称在全球范围内提供数字资产和期货交易服务，包括面向澳大利亚投资者。ASIC 表示 Yepbit 编造“ASIC 冻结资金”的说法，目的是拖延投资者的退款要求。Yepbit 未持有澳大利亚金融服务牌照，未在 AUSTRAC 注册为虚拟资产服务提供商。ASIC 提醒投资者应核实平台是否持有牌照，无法验证的投资机会应极为谨慎对待。 🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾 快讯/广告 联系 @Cindy88888
❤1
【美银：CTA 美债空头仍在高位，今晚 CPI 或成债市波动放大器】 美国 CPI 公布前，债市一个容易被忽视的技术性风险正在升温。美银证券在最新报告中指出，趋势跟踪型 CTA 在美国非农数据意外疲软后，仍然维持较高的美国国债期货空头。美债期货上周一度接近触发空头回补的区间，但随着收益率从低位反弹，模型显示这些空头仓位尚未被迫撤离。CTA 通常指系统化趋势跟踪资金。这类基金并不主要判断通胀、财政或美联储政策本身，而是根据价格趋势、波动率和止损阈值交易股指、美债、外汇、黄金和原油等资产。简单说，市场趋势越明确，CTA 越可能顺势加仓；一旦价格反向突破模型关口，它们也可能集中减仓或回补。因此，CTA 更像行情的放大器，通常不是市场方向的起点，却可能在关键数据公布后强化波动。美银称，10 年期美债期货仍处于空头趋势，当前价格约为 108.72，短线空头回补触发位大约在 109.41，更高触发位在 110.21 附近。换言之，如果 C…
👍1
【贝森特与高市早苗在日本央行问题上的分歧可能破坏日元反弹】 尽管美国和日本在推动日元走强方面展现出罕见的协调一致，但美国财政部长贝森特与日本首相高市早苗围绕日本央行的根本分歧，可能削弱双方的努力。贝森特认为收紧货币政策对解决日元疲软至关重要，而高市则对提高利率持谨慎态度，担心影响经济复苏。日本央行基准利率仍为 1%。 🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾 快讯/广告 联系 @Cindy88888
【SEC、CFTC 起诉 Goliath Ventures 及其创始人，涉 4 亿美元加密庞氏骗局】 美国证券交易委员会（SEC）与美国商品期货交易委员会（CFTC）分别对 Goliath Ventures 及其创始人 Christopher Delgado 提起民事诉讼，指控其涉嫌运营规模约 4 亿美元的加密庞氏骗局。SEC 称，该公司通过未注册证券发行向 1300 多名投资者筹集至少 4.25 亿美元。SEC 表示，Goliath Ventures 承诺将资金投入加密流动性池，并提供每月 3% 至 10% 的回报，但未投资任何资金或加密资产，且 Christopher Delgado 挪用至少 5100 万美元用于个人消费。CFTC 称，约 1600 名客户为比特币和以太坊交易投入至少 3.97 亿美元。Christopher Delgado 已同意接受 SEC 案件和解，具体条款仍待法院批准；CFTC 则寻求返还资金、追…
【CFTC 动用紧急权力命令 Kalshi 继续在纽约运营，预测市场联邦与州管辖权之争再度升级】 美国商品期货交易委员会 (CFTC) 宣布已动用紧急权力，命令预测市场平台 Kalshi 继续在纽约州运营，直接对抗纽约州政府试图关闭该平台的诉讼。纽约州总检察长 Letitia James 于 7 月底起诉 Kalshi，指控其提供体育相关预测市场违反州法律，并指责平台未获许可并逃避应缴纳税款。此前联邦法官已驳回 Kalshi 阻止纽约州起诉的请求。CFTC 主席 Mike Selig 明确表态，国会并未打算让衍生品交易平台受各州零散法规监管，预测市场属于联邦监管的互换产品，属于跨州金融市场，纽约州无权以本州法律加以干预。Selig 批评纽约州试图在法院作出最终裁决前扼杀事件合约衍生品。此次冲突进一步激化了联邦与州在预测市场监管权上的长期争夺。各州认为至少体育相关的预测市场属于州法监管，CFTC 则坚持拥有全面管辖权。 🎾🎾…
【美 SEC 拟推进加密货币发行规则提案，CLARITY Act 或迎 9 月关键节点】 加密记者 Eleanor Terrett 在 X 平台发文表示，尽管美国参议院已将《CLARITY Act》关键程序性投票推迟至 9 月，但监管机构正准备推进自身的加密货币发行规则框架，参议院此前未能完成针对 CLARITY Act 的程序性投票，相关议程被推迟至 9 月。参议院多数党领袖 John Thune 已提交程序动议，预计 9 月中旬可能迎来新的投票窗口。 与此同时，美国证券交易委员会（SEC）正在筹备针对加密资产发行活动的新规则提案。市场人士认为，即使 CLARITY Act 立法进程出现延迟，监管机构仍可能通过行政规则推动数字资产市场结构改革。 分析人士指出，未来几个月美国加密监管路径可能出现“双轨推进”：一方面，国会继续推动 CLARITY Act 等市场结构立法；另一方面，SEC 可能通过规则制定提前建立针对代币发行、交…
【前白宫 AI 顾问：“AI 对抗 AI”将推动网络安全创业浪潮】 前白宫人工智能政策高级顾问 Sriram Krishnan 在接受 CNBC 节目《Squawk Box》采访时表示，未来将出现一波利用人工智能对抗人工智能（AI fighting AI）的网络安全初创公司浪潮。随着 AI 模型能力快速提升，尤其是具备自主运行能力的“失控 AI 模型”（rogue AI models）风险增加，网络安全领域将需要新的防御体系，包括利用 AI 技术实时识别、监控和阻止 AI 驱动的攻击。Sriram Krishnan 认为，未来网络安全竞争将演变为“AI 攻防战”，攻击者可能利用 AI 自动发现漏洞、发动攻击，而防御方也必须依靠 AI 提升威胁检测和响应能力，这将为新一代网络安全创业公司创造机会。在采访中，Krishnan 还讨论了 AI 产业竞争格局、英伟达（Nvidia）5000 亿美元融资计划以及全球 AI 军备竞赛等话题…
👍1
【英国议会加密资产全党议员小组致函主要银行，要求说明加密企业账户及支付限制】 英国议会加密货币和数字资产跨党派议员小组（Crypto and Digital Assets APPG）联合主席 Gurinder Singh Josan 与 Lord Vaizey of Didcot 已致函所有主要英国银行 CEO，要求说明如何对待加密及数字资产企业。信件提出六项问题，涉及银行现行政策、是否向加密企业提供服务、相关交易限制及其决定因素，并询问英国金融行为监管局（FCA）监管制度生效后是否调整做法。该小组表示，许多加密企业难以在英国银行开户，部分银行还限制相关支付。该信件源于 7 月 21 日启动的议会银行服务准入调查，书面意见征集截至 8 月 31 日。英国加密资产商业委员会 1 月调查显示，银行阻止或延迟转入加密交易所的交易比例估计达 40%。HSBC、NatWest、Monzo 和 Nationwide 将每月转入加密交易所的…
👍2
【FCA 探索代币化黄金进入英国批发抵押品市场，伦敦占全球交易量 70%】 英国监管机构 Financial Conduct Authority（FCA）正在探讨代币化黄金如何纳入批发市场，包括是否可作为抵押品。相关讨论涉及面向机构市场的监管方式，相关规则或于未来数月公布。该监管讨论正值伦敦寻求巩固其全球黄金交易中心地位之际。World Gold Council 数据显示，伦敦目前约占全球黄金交易量 70%，上海与香港正争夺更多批发业务份额。汇丰两年多前在香港面向散户推出代币化黄金产品，并表示累计交易额已超过 22 亿美元，交易笔数超过 27.6 万笔。FCA 不直接监管实物黄金交易，但监管黄金衍生品及公开市场上市交易产品。 🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾 快讯/广告 联系 @Cindy88888
【骗子闲聊月余设虚拟货币“挖矿”骗局，30 余人被骗超 300 万元】 据齐鲁晚报报道，近期出现一种新型虚拟货币 “质押挖矿” 诈骗，骗子通过社交平台长线交友打造完美人设，持续一两个月与受害者聊天建立信任，随后引导受害者转至 WhatsApp、Discord 等境外私密通信软件，诱导其下载虚假挖矿平台并签署合约授权，利用合约的资产划转权限在后台悄无声息转移账户资金。骗子全程不提 “投资” “理财” 等敏感词，将骗局包装为 “闲置算力质押挖矿”，宣称零风险稳收益，并通过小额返利诱导受害者加大投入。目前受害者多为有副业需求的年轻人，已知被骗金额超 300 万元，单人最高损失超 30 万元，受害者遍布全国多地。律师提醒，虚拟货币交易不受法律保护，凡社交平台陌生人诱导跳转境外软件或要求钱包授权陌生合约的，一律视为诈骗，切勿二次转账。 🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾 快讯/广告 联系 @Cindy88888
❤1👍1
【白宫加密委员会主任：仍致力于 9 月推动《CLARITY Act》通过】 Patrick Witt 在 X 平台发文表示，政府仍致力于在 9 月推动《CLARITY Act》获得通过。其表示，只有立法才能提供持久规则，而当前比以往任何时候都更需要相关立法。此外，Patrick Witt 批评，民主党每次拖延该法案，都会让美国在加密领域的竞争中进一步落后，损害其全球金融市场领导地位、削弱国家安全，并剥夺执法部门打击加密犯罪的工具。他表示，《CLARITY Act》是多年真正的两党合作成果，民主党仍有机会通过协助立法来塑造美国数字资产政策。政府将保持开放态度，持续进行善意谈判，直至 9 月表决。 🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾 快讯/广告 联系 @Cindy88888
❤1
【韩国 FSS 升级反诈系统，加密资产纳入语音诈骗赔偿范围】 韩国金融监督服务（FSS）已启动为期三个月、预算约 1.19 亿韩元的欺诈退款系统重建工程。此次升级旨在配合今年 3 月 31 日修订的《电信欺诈损害赔偿法》——该法案将于 10 月 1 日正式生效，正式将虚拟资产纳入“受损财产”及“可退款财产”范畴。新系统将支持按代币类型及数量计算赔偿金额，并以资金被冻结时的韩元价值作为参考基准，同时具备拆解多账户混合诈骗资金的能力。Upbit、Bithumb、Coinone、Korbit 及 GOPAX 等主要交易所届时须承担与银行同等的反诈骗及受害者救济义务，包括核查交易目的、监控可疑资金及冻结涉嫌账户。 🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾🎾 快讯/广告 联系 @Cindy88888
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @fenchacaij. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“分叉财经(crypto news)” (@fenchacaij), 273,144 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fenchacaij.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.