會員反饋多到真的放不完😂 隨機抽幾個給大家看看👀 不是天天喊「賺多少」 而是會員一筆一筆真金白銀賺出來的📈 跟上的人自然知道這段時間到底有多猛💪 👉點擊立即加入會員👈
👍8❤2

Channel
@cryptoelroy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,021subscribers
+117 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001894373481 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptoelroy |
| Description | ✅ 點右上角瀏覽器打開 進入實盤社區跟單 ✅ 點右上角瀏覽器打開 進入實盤社區跟單 ✅ 點右上角瀏覽器打開 進入實盤社區跟單 ⭐️8年合約交易經驗 🫡三分技術 七分心態 📍專注於合約行情分析、策略分析 📍每日免費點位佈局,頻道勝率90%+ 👉專屬助理: @berry0_o 切記不要相信任何私訊 bitget註冊網址:https://partner.bitget.cafe/bg/GE6V0D 邀请码:ht6m (20%返佣) |
| Created | Between 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptoelroy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 12,021 | +5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 12,016 | +14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 12,002 | +28 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 11,974 | +34 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 11,940 | +7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 11,933 | +12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 11,921 | +7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 11,914 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 11,911 | +7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 11,904 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 11,907 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 11,910 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 11,909 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:40 | 11,907 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 11,904 | first reading |
94 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 94 (5 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 99,423 |
| Reactions total | 1,642 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,642 reactions across 94 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 933 | 56.8% | |
| ❤ | 436 | 26.6% | |
| 👌 | 273 | 16.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 94 of the 94 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,642reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptoelroy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 94 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
會員反饋多到真的放不完😂 隨機抽幾個給大家看看👀 不是天天喊「賺多少」 而是會員一筆一筆真金白銀賺出來的📈 跟上的人自然知道這段時間到底有多猛💪 👉點擊立即加入會員👈
👍8❤2
#幣勝客小課堂 📈為什麼同樣是十字星 有時看漲,有時卻看跌? 關鍵從來不是十字星本身 而是它出現的位置! 一張圖帶你看懂「十字星」👆
❤12
#幣勝客小課堂 📈為什麼突破之後 很多人一追就被套? 真正穩健的做法,有時候不是追突破,而是等回踩確認! 一張圖帶你快速看懂「回踩確認」👆
❤11
#bome 一小時完成十倍✅屌不屌?
👍24❤1
說一下我後續的交易思路:山寨幣做多為主,非必要不做空!在主流幣沒有出現較大幅度回撤之前,我會持續用1%倉位試空,先用小倉位驗證方向,等空頭回撤趨勢確定後再加倉。什麼時候多呢?等出現大幅回撤並開始止跌企穩時,這時便是空單止盈多頭進場的信號
❤11👌3
#bome 多頭賺麻了👍以前當空軍都是過得什麼苦日子啊🤣
👍14
#bome 兩倍啦📈簡單嗎小夥伴們👍
👍12❤1
#bome 一根泵📈直接完成翻倍✅請減倉並點贊👍
👍23❤1
#bome 市價小倉多
👌18
美股這兩天開始進入回調,科技股也同步集體回踩,回顧前一輪牛市啟動,當時一個非常明確的訊號就是美股持續拉升,BTC同步跟漲,走出了一段很長的協同行情,但現在美股轉弱,BTC卻反而獨自逆勢拉升,僅憑這一點就判定牛市到來,邏輯其實完全站不住腳❌ 從周期、量能以及盤面形態綜合來看,BTC目前距離真正的趨勢反轉仍有一定距離!更重要的是,短線盤面已經明顯超買,情緒也正在快速升溫,所以現在我反而更想提醒大家:絕對不要在高點盲目追多!!!做單前三思再三思!
👌15❤5
想澆一盆冷水,昨晚一波暴漲,可以看到目前市場的散戶投機情緒過熱,各項短線指標也逐漸進入超買區域,成交量也是近幾個月以來最高的一天,並且這一波漲幅清算了大量的空頭槓桿,形成很明顯的逼空行情📉 各項指標結合在一起,我反而覺得這一波更像是市場長期以來熊市壓抑的情緒,在利好刺激下的得到集中釋放,我不禁要問:這一波利好是否值得如此高的漲幅?換句話說市場是否對利好過度定價? 並不是我要唱空,而是看到目前市場的fomo情緒越來越重,更像是全市場的全員上頭,而越到這時候我們越要學會冷靜,要知道暴漲之後新的槓桿也在重新進場,這意味著行情雖在變強,但同時也在重新積累短線槓桿風險,所以現在我是很明確的不會去追多的,更傾向於等待市場先消化這波情緒,個人還是認為情緒過熱將進行一波情緒修復回調,回調的幅度我認為也不大,大概是在68500附近。你要明白,適當的踩剎車降溫才能讓行情更加健康 重新回到理性
❤15👍12
#幣勝客小課堂 📈為什麼突破之後,有的人賺到大行情,有的人卻直接被套? 因為真正重要的,不是「有沒有突破」,而是能不能站穩! 一張圖帶你快速看懂「突破與破位」👆
❤10👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 94 posts we hold for @cryptoelroy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 130,135 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“幣勝客_加密趨勢捕捉” (@cryptoelroy), 12,021 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoelroy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.