Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 幣勝客_加密趨勢捕捉

Channel

幣勝客_加密趨勢捕捉

@cryptoelroy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,021subscribers

+117 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001894373481
TypeChannel
Username@cryptoelroy
Description✅ 點右上角瀏覽器打開 進入實盤社區跟單 ✅ 點右上角瀏覽器打開 進入實盤社區跟單 ✅ 點右上角瀏覽器打開 進入實盤社區跟單 ⭐️8年合約交易經驗 🫡三分技術 七分心態 📍專注於合約行情分析、策略分析 📍每日免費點位佈局,頻道勝率90%+ 👉專屬助理: @berry0_o 切記不要相信任何私訊 bitget註冊網址:https://partner.bitget.cafe/bg/GE6V0D 邀请码:ht6m (20%返佣)
CreatedBetween 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptoelroy

Growth

11,90412,02111,962.57 August 2026 — 11,904 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,907 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,909 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,910 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,907 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,904 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,911 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,914 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,921 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,933 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,940 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,974 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,002 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,016 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,021 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 14 days, net +117. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,886–12,039 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 13:0812,021+5
20 Aug 2026, 13:3512,016+14
19 Aug 2026, 14:2212,002+28
18 Aug 2026, 12:4211,974+34
17 Aug 2026, 12:5411,940+7
16 Aug 2026, 06:2211,933+12
14 Aug 2026, 17:1611,921+7
13 Aug 2026, 07:5811,914+3
12 Aug 2026, 06:4211,911+7
11 Aug 2026, 06:0811,904-3
10 Aug 2026, 08:0011,907-3
9 Aug 2026, 09:5311,910+1
8 Aug 2026, 12:4211,909+2
7 Aug 2026, 15:4011,907+3
7 Aug 2026, 06:0111,904first reading

Engagement

94 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.80%
avg views ÷ 12,021 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,060
94 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
94
of 94 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held94 (5 August 202622 August 2026)
Views total99,423
Reactions total1,642
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,300
Videos
235
Links
434

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 14s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,642 reactions across 94 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍93356.8%
43626.6%
👌27316.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 94 of the 94 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,642reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 94 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptoelroy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 94 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC745 views10 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

會員反饋多到真的放不完😂 隨機抽幾個給大家看看👀 不是天天喊「賺多少」 而是會員一筆一筆真金白銀賺出來的📈 跟上的人自然知道這段時間到底有多猛💪 👉點擊立即加入會員👈

👍82

22 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC768 views12 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

#幣勝客小課堂 📈為什麼同樣是十字星 有時看漲,有時卻看跌? 關鍵從來不是十字星本身 而是它出現的位置! 一張圖帶你看懂「十字星」👆

12

21 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,310 views11 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

#幣勝客小課堂 📈為什麼突破之後 很多人一追就被套? 真正穩健的做法,有時候不是追突破,而是等回踩確認! 一張圖帶你快速看懂「回踩確認」👆

11

21 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC≈1,470 views25 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

#bome 一小時完成十倍✅屌不屌?

👍241

21 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC≈1,290 views14 reactionsread 22 August 2026

說一下我後續的交易思路:山寨幣做多為主,非必要不做空!在主流幣沒有出現較大幅度回撤之前,我會持續用1%倉位試空,先用小倉位驗證方向,等空頭回撤趨勢確定後再加倉。什麼時候多呢?等出現大幅回撤並開始止跌企穩時,這時便是空單止盈多頭進場的信號

11👌3

21 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC≈1,400 views14 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

#bome 多頭賺麻了👍以前當空軍都是過得什麼苦日子啊🤣

👍14

21 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC≈1,380 views13 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

#bome 兩倍啦📈簡單嗎小夥伴們👍

👍121

21 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC≈1,410 views24 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

#bome 一根泵📈直接完成翻倍✅請減倉並點贊👍

👍231

21 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC≈1,370 views20 reactionsread 22 August 2026

美股這兩天開始進入回調,科技股也同步集體回踩,回顧前一輪牛市啟動,當時一個非常明確的訊號就是美股持續拉升,BTC同步跟漲,走出了一段很長的協同行情,但現在美股轉弱,BTC卻反而獨自逆勢拉升,僅憑這一點就判定牛市到來,邏輯其實完全站不住腳❌ 從周期、量能以及盤面形態綜合來看,BTC目前距離真正的趨勢反轉仍有一定距離!更重要的是,短線盤面已經明顯超買,情緒也正在快速升溫,所以現在我反而更想提醒大家:絕對不要在高點盲目追多!!!做單前三思再三思!

👌155

20 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC≈1,550 views27 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

想澆一盆冷水,昨晚一波暴漲,可以看到目前市場的散戶投機情緒過熱,各項短線指標也逐漸進入超買區域,成交量也是近幾個月以來最高的一天,並且這一波漲幅清算了大量的空頭槓桿,形成很明顯的逼空行情📉 各項指標結合在一起,我反而覺得這一波更像是市場長期以來熊市壓抑的情緒,在利好刺激下的得到集中釋放,我不禁要問:這一波利好是否值得如此高的漲幅?換句話說市場是否對利好過度定價? 並不是我要唱空,而是看到目前市場的fomo情緒越來越重,更像是全市場的全員上頭,而越到這時候我們越要學會冷靜,要知道暴漲之後新的槓桿也在重新進場,這意味著行情雖在變強,但同時也在重新積累短線槓桿風險,所以現在我是很明確的不會去追多的,更傾向於等待市場先消化這波情緒,個人還是認為情緒過熱將進行一波情緒修復回調,回調的幅度我認為也不大,大概是在68500附近。你要明白,適當的踩剎車降溫才能讓行情更加健康 重新回到理性

15👍12

20 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC≈1,420 views13 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

#幣勝客小課堂 📈為什麼突破之後,有的人賺到大行情,有的人卻直接被套? 因為真正重要的,不是「有沒有突破」,而是能不能站穩! 一張圖帶你快速看懂「突破與破位」👆

10👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 94 posts we hold for @cryptoelroy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 130,135 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

分叉财经(crypto news)
@fenchacaij · 268,722
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
金色财经
@jinsecaijinpingdao · 252,818
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
华尔街日报
@HuaErJie1 · 71,514
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“幣勝客_加密趨勢捕捉” (@cryptoelroy), 12,021 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoelroy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.