#吃瓜:七夕情人节 1️⃣出门前 2️⃣出门后 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @bp888 投稿:@bx561

Channel
东南亚狗推(吃瓜)
@MB_149
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
121,941subscribers
+19,356 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001820570835 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @bp888 @MB_149 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MB_149 |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 121,941 | -3,153 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 125,094 | -419 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:17 | 125,513 | -88 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 125,601 | -71 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 125,672 | -83 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 125,755 | -263 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 126,018 | -74 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:16 | 126,092 | -325 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 126,417 | -167 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 126,584 | -186 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 126,770 | -1,375 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 128,145 | -243 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 128,388 | -190 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 128,578 | -202 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 128,780 | -261 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:49 | 129,041 | -96 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:38 | 129,137 | +35,734 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:56 | 93,403 | +24,082 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:03 | 69,321 | -48 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:27 | 69,369 | first reading |
Engagement
296 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 296 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2h 47m
- Average length
- 47s
Measured directly from 212 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
28 reactions across 24 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 85.7% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 3.57% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 296 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 296 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
有打pao的地方吗?~ 山东,老年男子进美容店找“玩玩”的地方 老色逼 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @bp888 投稿:@bx561
奸夫淫妇游街示众 栓好了 ! 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @bp888 投稿:@bx561
感动中国 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @bp888 投稿:@bx561
#网友投稿 崇洋媚外 媚黑女 你们眼里要花十几万彩礼的未来老婆 只要你不在乎女人是不是处女,那么这种烂货就有可能是你老婆 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @bp888 投稿:@bx561
大妈这是转晕了,还是转凉了 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @bp888 投稿:@bx561
就看哪个在秀 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @bp888 投稿:@bx561
话糙理不糙,中国男人不管怎么优秀还不如一个外国身份 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @bp888 投稿:@bx561
真心喜欢这种微胖的女孩子! 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @bp888 投稿:@bx561
#孙艺彤 福建极品高颜值女大 福建极品高颜值女大 孙艺彤 成为有钱人的玩物 性爱画面淫乱至极 看视频🌏传送门
马路上开吃 #口交 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @bp888 投稿:@bx561
❤1
#打小三 #扒衣服 喜闻乐见 #抓奸 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @bp888 投稿:@bx561
Showing the 12 most recent of 296 posts we hold for @MB_149. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@scbz666 · 15,79715 posts吃瓜群众神评中心
@chqz868 · 21,12711 posts东南亚吃瓜交流群
@dashijian55 · 22,1952 posts九博国际 · 公群导航
@jbgj · 17,2502 posts🏆九博国际@JBGJ🏆上下分群 总押900万美金
@jiubovip · 8,7192 posts6G全球丨官方爆奖俱乐部
@WWW6G007COM · 1,9792 posts6U.com|客服中心
@PG6U_com · 6501 post8K国际官方
@PG8K8K · 3,7381 post奇趣百科 导航
@QQmua · 39,3201 post122体育-官方频道
@tz228 · 7,0431 post6U.com|保证金查验教程
@WWW_6Ucom · 1921 postX6宝马会-官方频道
@x6x6 · 12,8431 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@MB_149 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 19 August 2026 – 19 August 2026 · confirmed gone 18 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bx666 · 467,845#1
@svip40 · 110,383#2
@SB919 · 128,290#3
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 44,661#4
@jpz_888 · 12,661#5
@sucai1 · 104,012#6
@aa144 · 35,225#7
@DNYTJL3 · 93,598#8
@toutiaoshijian · 73,288#9
@dnyggg · 43,934#10
@pyzcn · 221,209#11
@tx100 · 158,539#12
@ygxw3 · 143,918#13
@ab100 · 133,901#14
@mianbeitongjiling · 30,330#15
@dubai0 · 77,364#16
@mupai77 · 4,382#17
@bx777 · 43,100#18
@ac666 · 324,799#19
@usd1 · 253,065 (as read 16 August 2026)#20
@dj17 · 113,188#21
@blj77 · 181,156#22
@MGHDSJ · 13,991#23
@taiwansucai223 · 11,601#24
@chiguahs · 110,766#25
@kanxia · 469,444#26
@DNY_hasj · 207,019#27
@wbzd999 · 75,972#28
@dnygplm1 · 35,844#29
@bodutt · 39,340#30
@CG887 · 108,701#31
@cn789 · 20,355#32
@DjAXRemix · 10,434#33
@PG151 · 2,199#34
@xigang6 · 4,902#35
@xinwen1 · 104,937#36
@bg833 · 322,837#37
@feilongwang · 92,078#38
@Ru_Yi88 · 215,216#39
@cctvPH · 180,478#40
@gedan · 10,466#41
@xinwen811 · 207,923#42
@redian3 · 59,837#43
@dnyxsp · 67,931#44
@bb998888 · 2,798#45
@cctv1 · 308,989#46
@telonews_cn · 83,174#47
@CYfangchan888 · 1,372#48
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ay2028 · 77,862
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 18 August 2026
@cgbg8 · 103,458
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 August 2026
@onlychigua · 200,669
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 14 August 2026
@chiguahs · 110,766
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 14 August 2026
@dnyxsp · 67,931
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 16 August 2026
@HYY3333 · 116,290
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 16 August 2026
@JPZ990 · 90,168
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 15 August 2026
@CG887 · 108,701
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@svip40 · 110,383
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 17 August 2026
@xinwen1 · 104,937
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 August 2026
@DNYba · 122,078
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 18 August 2026
@guawa9 · 88,468
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 17 August 2026
@dj17 · 113,188
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 16 August 2026
@xigangz · 89,934
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 15 August 2026
@jianpuzhaihuarenzixun · 75,233
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@sucai1 · 104,012
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 14 August 2026
@JPZDSJ · 220,328
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 17 August 2026
@fzjt0 · 137,496
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 15 August 2026
@JPZshibao888 · 76,978
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 18 August 2026
@jpz9118 · 97,799
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
@dnydxw · 71,142
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 August 2026
@quanwangbaoguang0 · 145,879
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
@sucai177 · 106,187
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 15 August 2026
@abc03 · 221,581
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 44 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚狗推(吃瓜)” (@MB_149), 121,941 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MB_149.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.