#內部會員群 八月穩贏😇 獲利不停歇💋 內部會員群每一張策略均爲具體點位/極致的盈虧比-精準的止盈止損✅(開倉點/止盈點/止損點)👍
❤4👍1

Channel
@crypto_colin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,758subscribers
-933 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001274623354 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_colin |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_colin |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 18:17 | 9,758 | -158 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 9,916 | -90 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 10,006 | -21 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 10,027 | -36 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 10,063 | -29 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 10,092 | -21 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 10,113 | -52 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 10,165 | -53 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 10,218 | -17 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:23 | 10,235 | -22 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:35 | 10,257 | -16 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 10,273 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 10,276 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 10,286 | -14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 10,300 | -25 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 10,325 | -33 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 10,358 | -17 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 10,375 | -21 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 10,396 | -19 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 10,415 | first reading |
118 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 118 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,141 reactions across 114 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 900 | 78.9% | |
| ❤ | 189 | 16.6% | |
| 🥰 | 15 | 1.31% | |
| 😭 | 14 | 1.23% | |
| 🙈 | 9 | 0.789% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.263% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 0.263% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.175% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.175% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.088% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.088% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.088% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.088% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 114 of the 118 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,141 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crypto_colin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 118 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#內部會員群 八月穩贏😇 獲利不停歇💋 內部會員群每一張策略均爲具體點位/極致的盈虧比-精準的止盈止損✅(開倉點/止盈點/止損點)👍
❤4👍1
#link 翻倍了兄弟們 補倉精準介入,跟上點贊👍
👍16
#xag 6x拿下👍
👍8❤1
#link 4H圖表 支阻轉換,做一筆多單預期
❤6
感謝小夥伴反饋 👍 HYPE 一單收益+187U 所以我的策略从来不是死守一個點位,而是根據實時盤面尋找更合適的機會💋 錯過一個進場還有下一個 市場一直有機會、但你什麼時候可以跟上❓
👍5❤1
#hype 2倍,突破拿下👍
👍7
#eth 4倍💋 還在持有的留底倉格局
👍10❤2
持續反饋不斷🌈 內部會員群全是精準點位 超倍收益帶大家穩穩落袋拿下🆕
👍4
#iotx 翻倍,自行分批止盈了
❤9👍4
#sndk 1H圖表多頭預期
👍5❤1
#iotx 市價小多
❤3
感謝會員曬圖反饋❤️ 有人還在觀望 有人已經默默把錢賺了 同樣的市場、同樣的行情👍 跟對節奏跟對人,盈利自然會找上門
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @crypto_colin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“【Colin】幣圈研究所” (@crypto_colin), 9,758 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_colin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.