Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 币圈新闻即时快讯🅥

Channel

币圈新闻即时快讯🅥

@ppbbb

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,924subscribers

-409 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001668307169
TypeChannel
Usernames@ddbbb @ppbbb
Description币圈、虚拟币、财经、即时新闻
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held127
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ppbbb

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@jinseBTC/21978514 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC@ppbbb/246092 · this entry14 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC0.947 minutes
@jinseBTC/2299643 Nov 2026, 01:08 UTC@ppbbb/266733 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 01:13 UTC0.935 minutes
@jinseBTC/22113125 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC@ppbbb/248596 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC0.927 minutes
@jinseBTC/22136427 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC@ppbbb/249061 · this entry27 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC0.922 minutes
@jinseBTC/2266449 Oct 2026, 13:29 UTC@ppbbb/260276 · this entry9 Oct 2026, 13:32 UTC0.923 minutes
@jinseBTC/22161228 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC@ppbbb/249542 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC0.915 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@jinseBTC16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.916 minutes@jinseBTC (16–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 16 of the 16 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,555 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

21,69322,33322,01321,9246 August 202612 November 2026
127 measurements spanning 98 days, net -409. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,597–22,429 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 127
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 12:0421,924no change
12 Nov 2026, 09:4921,924+51
10 Nov 2026, 11:1521,873no change
10 Nov 2026, 10:0121,873+62
9 Nov 2026, 02:2821,811no change
9 Nov 2026, 00:3821,811-3
7 Nov 2026, 22:0721,814+1
7 Nov 2026, 17:0721,813-4
6 Nov 2026, 19:1821,817no change
6 Nov 2026, 17:1721,817+18
5 Nov 2026, 18:1921,799no change
5 Nov 2026, 15:1621,799+16
4 Nov 2026, 18:2921,783+7
4 Nov 2026, 12:4121,776+5
3 Nov 2026, 21:0521,771-8
3 Nov 2026, 12:4421,779+11
2 Nov 2026, 22:0121,768+11
2 Nov 2026, 16:0121,757+22
1 Nov 2026, 14:0721,735-4
31 Oct 2026, 21:4921,739first reading

Engagement

1,900 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.63%
avg views ÷ 21,924 subscribers
Avg views / post
138
500 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.624%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
500
of 1,900 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 500 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held1,900 (6 August 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total69,100
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 03:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈16,000
Links
≈250,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 33 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2676.5%
❤720.6%
🤣12.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 August 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 500 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Nov 2026, 03:37 UTC45 viewsread 15 November 2026

Aave高管:过去两天借款人共发生约3900万美元的清算 币圈新闻: 11月15日消息,据 The Defiant 报道,Aave 首席战略与业务官 Luigi D’Onorio DeMeo 发文表示,在过去两天内,借款人共发生了约 3900 万美元的清算。借款人的抵押资产不足以支持贷款时,仓位可能被清算;但清算金额本身并不等同于 Aave 贷款方所遭受的损失。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥

15 Nov 2026, 03:36 UTC50 viewsread 15 November 2026

UNI跌破5美元 金色财经报道,行情显示,UNI跌破5美元,现报4.99美元,24小时跌幅达到11.05%,行情波动较大,请做好风险控制。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥

15 Nov 2026, 03:28 UTC94 viewsread 15 November 2026

韩国加密交易所Coinone客服外包服务器遭入侵,部分用户咨询信息泄露 币圈新闻: 11月15日消息,韩国加密交易所 Coinone 发布公告称,其客户咨询业务外包商服务器于 11 月 12 日凌晨遭外部攻击者非法入侵,导致部分客户咨询相关个人信息泄露。Coinone 确认,仅有进行过客户中心咨询的用户受影响,无咨询记录的用户与本次泄露无关。泄露信息可能包括咨询过程中用户提供的电话号码、姓名、电子邮箱地址、出生日期、银行账号、密码、居民登记号码、证件签发日期、家庭住址、钱包地址以及交易 ID(TXID),具体因人而异。 Coinone 强调,其会员账户、交易及虚拟资产钱包系统与外包商服务器相互独立,目前未发现直接入侵迹象。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥

15 Nov 2026, 03:26 UTC109 viewsread 15 November 2026

某交易员过去10小时遭遇7次爆仓,累计被清算1103万美元BTC和544万美元ETH 金色财经报道,11月15日,据 Lookonchain 监测,交易员 0xc05b 在过去 10 小时内遭遇了 7 次爆仓,累计被清算了 172 枚 BTC(价值 1103 万美元)和 2984 枚 ETH(价值 544 万美元)。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥

15 Nov 2026, 03:26 UTC112 viewsread 15 November 2026

TG 会员新功能,助推频道! 关注、助推频道! 即时动态获取最新活动讯息! (TG需更新至最新版本才能使用!) https://t.me/ppbbb?boost

15 Nov 2026, 03:17 UTC139 viewsread 15 November 2026

币安平台USDT场外价格短时升至6.75元,USDT溢价率暂报1.16% 金色财经报道,据币安行情数据显示,USDT场外价格短时升至6.75元。当前美元兑人民币汇率为6.67元,USDT溢价率达1.16%。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥

15 Nov 2026, 03:07 UTC170 viewsread 15 November 2026

BTC突破65000美元 金色财经报道,行情显示,BTC突破65000美元,现报65099.98美元,24小时跌幅达到3.81%,行情波动较大,请做好风险控制。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥

15 Nov 2026, 02:51 UTC225 viewsread 15 November 2026

某交易员过去10小时遭遇7次爆仓,累计被清算1103万美元BTC和544万美元ETH 币圈新闻: 11月15日消息,据 Lookonchain 监测,交易员 0xc05b 在过去 10 小时内遭遇了 7 次爆仓,累计被清算了 172 枚 BTC(价值 1103 万美元)和 2984 枚 ETH(价值 544 万美元)。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥

15 Nov 2026, 02:49 UTC224 viewsread 15 November 2026

麻吉卖出Bored Ape #2894,亏损约20.4万美元 金色财经报道,11月15日,据 Lookonchain 监测,Machi(麻吉)5 年前以 125 ETH 买入了“无聊猿”(Bored Ape)#2894,如今仅以 7.3 ETH 售出,亏损 117.7 ETH(约 20.4 万美元)。卖出的资金或用于高杠杆交易。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥

15 Nov 2026, 02:42 UTC225 viewsread 15 November 2026

巨鲸fiyopi平多ETH亏损1049万美元,并开多价值2700万美元的SOL 币圈新闻: 11月15日消息,据余烬监测,巨鲸 fiyopi 几天前以 2,207.5 美元的价格开多 2.45 万枚 ETH (约 5408 万美元),随着 ETH 崩盘式下跌,该巨鲸在今天早上以 1,783.3 美元的价格认输平多,亏损 1049 万美元。在平多 ETH 后接着就以 70.5 美元的价格开多了价值 2700 万美元的 SOL。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥

15 Nov 2026, 02:33 UTC241 views1 reactionsread 15 November 2026

交易员Flood:BTC出现职业生涯中最激进的不计价格抛售,几乎全在Coinbase上 币圈新闻: 11月15日消息,交易员 Flood 发文表示,BTC 出现其职业生涯中见过的最激进、最不敏感于价格的抛售行为,几乎所有抛售都发生在 Coinbase,而且发生在周末(流动性最差时段)。他表示,面对这种资金流,必须思考:大户是否掌握了某种内幕信息?是否存在隐藏杠杆正在平仓?盲目在这些位置接盘容易被“割韭菜”。 Flood 猜测可能的原因包括:有人对地缘政治事件有内幕优势,周末用 BTC 作为最易交易的工具;知晓某种量子技术相关消息;在抢跑更大规模的强制卖出;单纯清仓抛售。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥

❤1

15 Nov 2026, 02:24 UTC237 viewsread 15 November 2026

捷克国家银行试行分布式账本技术债券发行 币圈新闻: 11月15日消息,据 Ledgerinsights 报道,捷克国家银行(CNB)已完成发行数字债券测试。此次测试使用的平台是捷克中央证券存管机构 CSD Prague,该机构恰好是首个获得欧盟分布式账本技术(DLT)试点制度许可的基础设施。捷克当地商业银行Česká spořitelna担任交易对手方。债券发行面额仅为 1 万捷克克朗(约合 453 美元)。测试通过捷克国家银行实验室(CNB Lab)进行,包括购买、出售、利息支付以及回购交易。 电影频道在线看 │ ChatGPT中文群🅥

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,900 posts we hold for @ppbbb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Telo News 简体中文 - 加密货币|DeFi |Web3
@telonews_cn · 79,720
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
分叉财经(crypto news)
@fenchacaij · 229,177
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
金色财经
@jinsecaijinpingdao · 215,163
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
【华尔街见闻】- 财经时讯 | AI 实时互动
@FinanceNewsDaily · 59,438
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
Toncoin 中文频道
@toncoin_cn · 135,900
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
Btok News
@BtokMedia · 258,507
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
海外素材库
@sucai1 · 58,852
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 14 August 2026
华尔街日报
@HuaErJie1 · 59,971
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
☀️【佳佳】生活素材馆☀️
@sucai277 · 103,457
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 15 August 2026
东南亚大事件-聚焦时事
@pp854 · 65,529
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 19 August 2026
💯【佳佳】美食素材圈💯
@sucai177 · 98,617
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 15 August 2026
欧易OKX公告
@OKXAnnouncements_CN · 45,120
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
互联网观察
@guanchahulw · 59,572
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 August 2026
Coindesk
@Coindesk001 · 46,698
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“币圈新闻即时快讯🅥” (@ppbbb), 21,924 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ppbbb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.