Channel
@jinsecaijinpingdao
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
256,443subscribers
-2,329 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001697024078 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jinsecaijinpingdao |
| Description | 接快讯，商务合作联系 @Cindy88888 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jinsecaijinpingdao |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 256,443 | -509 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 256,952 | -470 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 257,422 | -402 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 257,824 | -409 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 258,233 | -525 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 258,758 | -14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 258,772 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:29 | 258,772 | first reading |
52 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 52 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 52 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 50,678 |
| Reactions total | 76 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
76 reactions across 36 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 57 | 75.0% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【特朗普回应秘密换机返美规避暗杀：收到很多威胁，我听从军方安排】 特朗普确认上月离开土耳其时秘密更换了飞机。此前白宫曾让外界以为特朗普乘坐空军一号从土耳其返美，但实际上他被安排搭乘另一架飞机。特朗普当地时间周二表示，这是特勤局和军方因安全威胁而提出的要求。他们希望我乘坐另一趟航班、另一架飞机，安全性是一样的，但他们要求我这么做，所以我照做。我听他们的安排。这一复杂安排源于伊朗针对特朗普的暗杀威胁。当时白宫工作人员、随行记者以及其他政府官员乘坐空军一号从安卡拉北约峰会返回美国，并被误导认为总统与他们同机返程。当被问及为何要更换飞机时，特朗普回答：我猜外面确实存在某种威胁，我没有过多询问。我收到很多威胁。但特朗普拒绝透露具体威胁内容，也没有解释为何军方认为其他人员乘坐总统专机是安全的，而他本人却不能乘坐。 🌏🌍🌎🌏🌍🌎 快讯/广告 联系 @Cindy88888
👍2❤1
【韩国拟明年向 AI 等战略产业主权财富基金注资超 7 亿美元】 韩国财政部创新增长室负责人闵庚卨周二表示，预计韩国明年将向一支瞄准 AI 等战略性产业的新主权财富基金部署 6000 亿至 1 万亿韩元（约合 7.07 亿美元）新资金，最终投资额有可能超过初步预期，具体将取决于确定了哪些目标以及它们的资金需求。闵庚卨称，目前没有让该基金直接投资三星电子和 SK 海力士的计划。今年 7 月，韩国政府宣布将在韩国投资公社（KIC）旗下新设“战略产业投资账户”，初期资金至少高于 20 万亿韩元（约合人民币 940 亿元），投资对象包括 AI、半导体、数据中心以及海外供应链核心企业等，计划明年正式设立并运营“韩国版主权财富基金”。闵庚卨表示，该基金还将瞄准机器人、能源和电池以及电网等基础设施，核能、太空和量子技术也在考虑范围之内。 🌏🌍🌎🌏🌍🌎 快讯/广告 联系 @Cindy88888
【SEC 计划公布重大加密货币计划，涉及加密投资合约定制化发行与证券代币化】 在《加密货币市场结构法案》（即 CLARITY 法案）在美国国会陷入停滞之际，美国证券交易委员会（SEC）准备在未来几天推出两项重大举措，可能进一步提振美国加密货币行业。SEC 宣布将于周五举行公开会议，为涉及加密资产的某些投资合约创建定制化发行机制。此外 SEC 还计划很快公布创新豁免举措，允许交易证券的代币化版本。此举可能重塑美国股票市场格局，并为区块链上股票代币的 24/7 全天候交易铺平道路。 🌏🌍🌎🌏🌍🌎 快讯/广告 联系 @Cindy88888
👍2
【俄罗斯央行拟允许 Bitcoin、Ethereum 和 USDT 在受监管交易所公开交易】 俄罗斯央行提出一份可纳入公开交易的加密资产名单，包含 Bitcoin、Ethereum 及泰达币 USDT。该提议依据俄总统普京于 8 月 4 日签署的新法推进，新法授权俄罗斯央行决定哪些数字货币可进入有组织交易并制定相关规则。 🌏🌍🌎🌏🌍🌎 快讯/广告 联系 @Cindy88888
👍2
【币安：新西兰出现假冒币安短信诈骗】 币安新西兰站近日发布安全警告，提醒当地用户注意近期频繁出现的短信钓鱼诈骗活动。诈骗者冒充币安官方，以赠送免费加密货币或活动门票为诱饵，并在短信中虚假声称其活动已获得新西兰金融市场管理局（FMA）的批准。 币安提醒用户，切勿点击此类短信中的任何链接，也不要将钱包连接到可疑平台。用户可通过币安官方核验工具“Binance Verify”对相关联系方式及网址进行真实性验证，以防范资产损失。 🌏🌍🌎🌏🌍🌎 快讯/广告 联系 @Cindy88888
【菲尔兹奖获得者雅各布·齐默曼告别数学，今年夏末前将入职 OpenAI】 新晋菲尔兹奖获得者雅各布・齐默曼（Jacob Tsimerman）宣布告别数学，停止招收博士生，投身 AI 领域，并且将于今年夏末之前正式入职 OpenAI，他的目标是找到控制 AI 的办法，以遏制这场潜在的“文明级毁灭风险”。目前，各大 AI 企业的安全团队正在加速招聘计算机行业之外的顶尖学者，Anthropic 聘用了一名斯坦福大学经济学家以及一位得克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校的哲学家；OpenAI 则招揽了一众顶尖数学家与物理学家。仅 2026 年，就有至少 22 位教授选择离开或暂离斯坦福、伯克利、哈佛、麻省理工学院等顶尖学府，加入 OpenAI、Anthropic、Meta 及 Google DeepMind。 🌏🌍🌎🌏🌍🌎 快讯/广告 联系 @Cindy88888
👍1
【韩国强化加密监管，交易所大股东审查趋严，取消 Travel Rule 适用门槛】 据韩国媒体 Edaily 报道，韩国金融情报分析院（FIU）宣布，旨在加强加密行业监管的《特定金融信息法》施行令修订案已获国务会议通过。新规的主要变化包括：监管机构将更严格审查交易所的大股东资质，同时要求交易所的负债率不得超过 200%。此外，此前的 Travel Rule 只对 100 万韩元以上的交易生效，今后将覆盖所有转账，不再设金额门槛。针对海外交易所和个人钱包的交易，将根据风险等级采取差异化管控。新规还要求交易所配备专业人员和必要设备，并建立内部控制系统，现有交易所可获得一年宽限期。部分条款将于 8 月 20 日起生效，涉及 Travel Rule 等内容将在六个月后正式实施。 🌏🌍🌎🌏🌍🌎 快讯/广告 联系 @Cindy88888
👍3
【特朗普推文提前看，Truth Social 拟向金融服务机构出售高速数据访问服务】 据官方公告及《纽约时报》等报道称，特朗普旗下 Truth Social 正通过新推出的 Truth API，向金融服务机构出售平台重点账号帖文的高速数据访问服务。该接口已于 8 月 1 日上线，公司称已签署超过十份客户协议，并已开始贡献收入。该接口具体领先普通用户多久尚无公开披露。TMTG 仅称其将以毫秒级交付帖文，路透则称速度将显著快于普通推送通知。对高频和算法交易机构而言，即便数秒级时间差，也可能形成交易优势。Truth Social 人士称，Truth API 报价约为每月 6 万至 10 万美元。按十余家客户测算，该业务年化收入或达约 800 万至 1300 万美元。相比之下，Trump Media 二季度总收入仅为 170 万美元，意味着该数据接口若稳定续约，将成为公司收入结构中的重要新增来源。这一业务的卖点在于速度。对交易机构而言…
👍2❤1
【韩国拟规定法院可要求交易所七天内披露并冻结债务人加密资产】 韩国最高法院拟议的《民事执行规则》修正案将建立标准化程序，允许债权人冻结、识别和清算债务人持有的虚拟资产。法院可要求交易所在收到命令后七天内披露债务人持有的加密资产类型和数量，并冻结相应资产。该提案征求意见截止日期为预计 10 月 1 日生效。一旦资产被识别和冻结，法院可指定分配给债权人或下令清算，由虚拟资产服务提供商执行出售。 🌏🌍🌎🌏🌍🌎 快讯/广告 联系 @Cindy88888
👍1
【Strategy CEO：仅靠比特币无法满足投资者需求，因此调整策略增加现金储备】 Strategy CEO Phong Le 表示，公司目前已建立 47.5 亿美元现金储备，可覆盖约 2.7 年的股息支付。其称，公司此前认为投资者会高度认可比特币的流动性和长期升值能力，但在推出优先股产品后发现，机构及短期资金投资者仍然更看重现金流动性。Strategy 正从单纯买入并持有比特币，逐步转向更广泛的数字信贷业务。公司已推出 STRC 等优先股产品，为希望获得比特币相关收益、但又希望降低波动性的投资者提供选择。他称，虽然自己可能更愿意持有比特币，但让这些优先股产品顺利运作，最终也有助于 MSTR 及公司的比特币战略。Le 还表示，Strategy 希望成为数字金融领域的摩根大通，并设想其他公司未来能够基于 Strategy 的金融产品开发新的投资工具，DeFi 也可能进一步扩展不同风险和收益组合，并将更多资本引入比特币。目前 S…
👍1
【特朗普称自沃什履新以来仅与其短暂交谈一次，否认频繁沟通】 美国总统特朗普周一表示，自美联储主席沃什上任以来，两人仅进行过一次简短交谈，并否认外界所称双方频繁沟通的说法。美国白宫国家经济委员会主任哈塞特上周表示，两人经常讨论经济问题，但其他知情人士称，双方通话并不规律，频率也不高。此前有报道称，自沃什于 5 月获确认担任美联储主席以来，特朗普与其进行了多次沟通，特朗普曾询问沃什对经济前景的预测和看法。特朗普再次表达希望降低利率的立场，但称自己100% 支持沃什，并强调美联储政策由理事会共同决定。 🌏🌍🌎🌏🌍🌎 快讯/广告 联系 @Cindy88888
【ZachXBT：威胁行为者 Tiffany 涉嫌盗取加密资产并赌博，与美国政府被盗资金案件有关】 链上侦探 ZachXBT 披露，代号 “Tiffany” 的威胁行为者涉嫌参与多起加密资产盗窃，将受害者被盗资金在加密赌场进行赌博，还曾致电嘲讽受害者。平台 Shuffle 依据 ZachXBT 提交证据已冻结相关账户；Tiffany 此前曾分享一份康涅狄格州搜查扣押令，文书日期早于本次部分涉案事件。ZachXBT 已掌握聊天记录、录音及链上证据，预判该人员或将面临进一步法律后果。该威胁行为者还和 John Daghita（Lick）案件存在关联，后者涉嫌从美国政府扣押钱包盗取超 4600 万美元加密资产。 🌏🌍🌎🌏🌍🌎 快讯/广告 联系 @Cindy88888
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @jinsecaijinpingdao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,018,611 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“金色财经” (@jinsecaijinpingdao), 256,443 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jinsecaijinpingdao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.