#ICNT 目前完成底部區間整理,短線正在嘗試突破0.116壓力位。若放量站穩該位置,有機會開啟新一輪反彈行情。操作上建議以突破確認或回踩支撐做多為主,不建議在壓力未突破前提前追高。

Channel
Saber Alpha | 加密信號研究 🌐
@news_crypto00
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,895subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001784755022 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @news_crypto00 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/news_crypto00 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:15 | 2,895 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:02 | 2,898 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 2,902 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 2,901 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 2,904 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 2,905 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 2,911 | +9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 2,902 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 2,906 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 2,914 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 2,915 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 2,915 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#MRVL 目前符合上升旗型整理特徵,短線等待回踩支撐確認,若突破225壓力並伴隨放量,則有機會開啟第二波上攻。回踩212~214附近可以買入多單。
#PUMP 在0.00228~0.00235 區域形成明顯支撐,價格多次回踩該區域後快速反彈,代表短線買盤開始承接。目前屬於下跌後的震盪築底階段,短線重點在於支撐是否有效守住,只要0.00235不破,多頭仍有反彈延續機會,市價買入一筆,下方支撐線補倉。
#SKYAI 強勢啟動,提前佈局抓住主升浪,一單斬獲 48% 漲幅。
7日實盤翻倉群,第二單盈利完成 🎊
7日實盤翻倉群,第一單盈利完成 🎊
📌 翻倉交易日記|Daily Insight 短線交易拼的不是預測, 而是等待市場給出信號。 找到關鍵位置, 制定交易計劃, 等待價格走到我們的節奏。 不追漲,不恐慌, 不因一次盈虧打亂策略。
❤1
#BTC 浮盈
第二期7日實盤翻倉計劃正在火熱進行中🔥 新會員申請持續增加,感謝大家的支持 7日實盤翻倉申請:https://t.me/BG_xiaoan
#BTC 昨日這筆空單繼續持有,等晚間美股開盤後才能走出趨勢。
#BTC 目前仍維持反彈修復結構,價格重新站回下降趨勢線上方,短線多頭開始重新掌握節奏。不過,上方 64500-65000 仍是前方密集成交區與短線壓力帶,在沒有放量突破之前,不建議追高。 從技術面來看,目前價格重新站上布林中軌,布林帶開始向上開口,MACD 維持金叉且紅柱持續放大,代表多頭動能仍在,但已逐漸接近壓力區,短線容易出現震盪整理。
❤1
#HOME 完成TP1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @news_crypto00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@sanmage · 31,289
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
@fenchacaij · 260,537
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
@bitebishuqin · 40,316
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Saber Alpha | 加密信號研究 🌐” (@news_crypto00), 2,895 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/news_crypto00.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.