Channel
@bitebishuqin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
40,601subscribers
+817 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001732183951 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bitebishuqin |
| Description | 💫Youtube频道：分析师舒琴谈比特币 💫每周1，3，5晚上8点左右更新 💫舒琴助理（加VIP会员）：请联系 t.me/shuqinzhuli 其他群和私聊账户都是仿冒诈骗 本群为公开群，主要更新新闻。另有Vip会员群，每天更新操作点位、机构数据和潜力币信息，可以找小助理 t.me/shuqinzhuli 了解下。 每天更新实时市场动态。内容为个人经验分享，非投资建议，也许会因为持币等因素而不够客观，请做好自己的研究。 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bitebishuqin |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 40,601 | +189 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 40,412 | +16 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 40,396 | +11 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 40,385 | +25 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 40,360 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 40,358 | +42 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:15 | 40,316 | +40 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 40,276 | +16 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:49 | 40,260 | +16 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:06 | 40,244 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 40,250 | +35 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 40,215 | +8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 40,207 | +9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 40,198 | +8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 40,190 | +30 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 40,160 | +49 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 40,111 | +34 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 40,077 | +8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 40,069 | +38 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 40,031 | first reading |
130 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 130 (31 July 2026 – 1 October 2026) |
| Views total | 466,200 |
| Reactions total | 6,438 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 01:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
8,976 reactions across 130 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,990 | 44.5% | |
| 👍 | 2,464 | 27.5% | |
| 🤩 | 1,187 | 13.2% | |
| 🔥 | 988 | 11.0% | |
| 😍 | 347 | 3.87% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 130 of the 130 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,976 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 130 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
卧槽，我不能再等了，比特币10月即将大暴涨？我要出手了！ 1. 现在我已经找不到看空的理由了。币圈的规律就是牛3年熊1年，而熊市是从去年10月开始的，到现在已经要结束了，后面只能看涨，下跌就是买入的机会！ 2. 特别是10月还是比特币历来牛市重启的月份，如图所示，BTC在10月的平均回报率和涨幅中位数都是接近20%的。如果这次10月也跟之前一样，那会涨到9.5万？ 3. 那10月舒琴唯一能找到利空的消息就是图2了，但是它也有可能是最大的利好！如图所示，现在纳斯达克时隔半年 再次站回前高附近、伺机突破。一旦成功，美股说不定会迎来另一波主升浪，所有资产包括币圈也会跟着受益。 4. 当然，前面说了，这也是风险所在，如果纳斯达克无法突破、掉头向下，那就是走了个双顶，大幅下跌，然后币圈也跟着遭殃，这是我能想到最坏的情况。 5. 但是！我个人认为，这次美股突破的概率还挺大的，因为它盘整了近半年，获利盘消化的差不多了，突破的概率还…
❤25👍9😍3🤩1
第二期露脸视频来啦，本琴来到了新加坡，那就讲讲新加坡吧~ 另外我看有人给我疯狂刷点赞，不知道这是什么情况，是攻击还是干什么呢？
😍30👍20❤14
新加坡为何如此富有？从濒临破产到亚洲人均第一，一口气搞懂新加坡开挂的60年！ 本期视频：https://youtu.be/SYZ0N1qHHRA
👍586🔥505🤩505❤493😍14
美光财报出来了！满分超预期啊，股价却没动？这个市场究竟怎么了，还是说，美光不行了？ 1. 咱们直接上美光的成绩单：营收542亿大幅高于预期的510亿，而公司自己指引才500亿。然后EPS 也牛逼，高达33.42，而才预期31.5上下。全年营收1331亿，是去年的3.6倍。 2. 可以说，美光这次财报跟小琴昨天分析的一样，给了市场一个大惊喜。但问题来了，为什么这么好的财报，美光却一点都涨不动？这个也不算利好出尽吧，因为美光财报前一周，它股价也没涨呀！ 3. 其实有两方面原因吧，第一个是，美光给的下季度指引个别数据有点弱，营收 615 亿，EPS 38.15，但是毛利率 下降到86% ，然后环比增速从 31% 降到 13%。人们对美光的高速增长是充满期待的，但是现在来看，只能算尚可。 4. 所以现在问题就来了，本次业绩和指引都不错，但股价暂时没反应，这个就不是那么好的信号。主要还是因为之前跌太多，套牢盘大，股价一涨呢 一堆…
👍18❤8🔥4🤩2😍2
主升浪来了？比特币今年能到10万吗？讲一个6倍潜力币：已梭，莫辜负。 https://youtu.be/DNQ7Dn8un6I
❤13👍4😍4
🤣卧槽，还是川普会玩。PCE通胀数据超级大力好啊！结果为3%，比预期3.3%整整低了0.3%！ 但是，你想想，这真的对吗？8月油价那么高，通胀还能下降？所以川普也知道，本次数据不会下降，所以他下了一盘大棋！直接修改了本月的PCE算法！ 如图所示，新的PCE算法将于今天生效，前值从3.3%变成了3%，什么高就改什么，所以这次数据是真牛逼，既然没法降下来，那我川普就直接改PCE算法！ 那不管怎么说吧，BTC因为利好上涨了，这是好事，论手段，还是得看川皇啊！
❤22👍10🤩2😍1
小心了，比特币今晚将迎来大震荡！新的行情要开始了吗，赶紧来看看。 1. 比特币横盘蓄力一周，今晚终于有了变盘的借口，美国晚上8.30将会PCE通胀数据，极其关键，可以说下月是否再次加息 全看这次PCE数据了。那问题来了，会是利好吗？ 2. 实话实说，不太乐观。因为9月是计算的8月数据，而8月油价高企，所以理性来看，这次PCE可能不是那么友好。我觉得比较好的情况就是符合预期，川普搞搞小动作 美化下数据，能符合预期就挺好了。如果川普不美化的话，那实际确实偏利空一些。 3. 不过币圈牛市已经来了，就算有利空也跌太动，更何况近期也是较高点8万7回调了5000点，行情还是比较健康的，任何较大回调都是你买入的机会。而且你别忘了，万一PCE是利好呢？那就是超预期了，币价直接上天！ 4. 那除开PCE不看，纯看币圈自身走势，我还是非常有信心的，这次盘整完，我认为他后面还能继续涨，这只是时间问题，因为我很清楚，币圈牛市就是来了，预计2…
❤25😍4👍1
Bitget现在也逐渐开放了，然后这回是下血本了，USDT理财年化10%，500万额度，ETH理财年化12%，也近乎没有上限，可以去薅一波羊毛~ 活动链接： https://www.bitgetapps.com/zh-TC/events/poolx/1488695039944093696?clacCode=shuqin666 注册链接： Bitget交易所永久8折手续费并送5005美金: https://partner.bitget.com/bg/shuqin666 (邀请码：shuqin666 一定要全部小写~大写无福利
❤8👍5🤩2😍1
😂大家先做好心理准备，美光MU今晚可能要炸了，还有SNDK一起，又要迎来大行情。 1. 华尔街屏息以待，美光即将迎来质变，会在今晚在盘后，也就是国内明天凌晨发布财报，未来一个月美光是涨是跌，全看今晚了！那问题来了，行情是利好吗？ 2. 咱们直接上数据吧，目前市场对财报的预期是这样的：营收 510 亿左右，同比 350%。EPS 31.5 上下，同比 940%。公司自己指引 500 亿正负 10 亿，毛利率 86%。 3. 最牛逼的还是86%， 这个数我看了两遍。卖内存颗粒的，毛利率干到 86% 也是很夸张。D.A. Davidson分析师Gil Luria积极看涨，重申2000美元目标价，比现价高近一倍。 4. 他逻辑就一句：内存越大，模型越强，推理越快。他还点名Meta的Muse应用走红，称“几周前还担心Meta需求下降，如今来看似乎不太可能”。 5. 小琴看了下，目前华尔街普遍是看涨的，因为仓位决定脑袋，他们持有美…
👍16❤13🔥3🤩2
这是哪个大聪明在给我刷点赞？是攻击还是什么
😍63❤34🤩13🔥11
怎么办，我有点怕了...你知道吗，比特币MACD死叉了！是不是要跌了？现在如何操作。 1. 如图所示，目前比特币日线MACD已经相交了，再往下一点，那就是死叉了啊！不少宝子非常担心，那比特币真会跌吗？我来说说我的看法吧。 2. 大趋势上来说，毋庸置疑，比特币牛市来了！长线一定是往上的，明年破10万，后年到15万甚至更多。所以对于长线现货来说，拿好就行，不要被震仓震下车，死拿2年，必定得到大结果。舒琴60-70%的仓位都是长线现货，拿着不动，怎么也不会卖。 3. 那短线呢？短线确实有那么一点风险吧。之前的话，舒琴对于行情那都是无脑看涨、杠杆拉满，现货杠杆都开到了1000万，相信大家都有印象。但是现在涨这么多，我周二就让大家止盈了一部分，担心中美会晤后的回调，那之后确实也跌了不少。 4. 那如图2所示，我之前其实发过，舒琴主要止盈了对风险最敏感、波动性更大的土狗币Pengu以及CRCL。现在一看，他俩都距最高点跌了15%甚至…
👍421🤩280❤273🔥273😍20
瑞幸咖啡股价大涨！勇闯中东，这次带着中东土豪的钱，能翻盘吗？ 六年前因财务造假退市的瑞幸，现在拉来中东主权基金当靠山，准备杀回海外。9月29日，瑞幸董事长黎辉确认正考虑进军海湾国家。 根据本月披露数据，阿布扎比主权基金Mubadala与大钲资本联合投资10亿美元，Mubadala由此入股瑞幸咖啡。这家3850亿美元的基金此前已在中国投了超200亿美元，包括Shein和万达商管。 其实2019年瑞幸就计划进中东，结果第二年爆出22亿营收造假，退市、破产。如今靠大钲资本操盘，中国门店超3.6万家，二季度营收增长28.5%，月活1.13亿，已超过星巴克成为中国按销售额计最大咖啡连锁。淡马锡5月披露持股6.4%，Mubadala刚入局，孙宇晨也自曝有投瑞幸。 市场为什么感兴趣？ 海湾咖啡消费高频稳定，低糖健康偏好上升，与瑞幸定位契合。中东主权基金的钱更是地缘背书。 但真正的看点不在开店数字。 瑞幸海外规模仍有限：Q2财报数…
❤24🔥3🤩3
Showing the 12 most recent of 130 posts we hold for @bitebishuqin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“舒琴比特币行情资讯(其他均为仿冒)” (@bitebishuqin), 40,601 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bitebishuqin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.