时代在改变,游戏要继续
🎉4❤2👍1🤔1

Channel
@Tonnypowerbewithyou
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
29,629subscribers
-291 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001484548547 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Tonnypowerbewithyou |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Tonnypowerbewithyou |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 29,629 | -33 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 29,662 | -38 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 29,700 | -31 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 29,731 | -42 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:41 | 29,773 | -24 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:21 | 29,797 | -34 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 29,831 | -44 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 29,875 | -27 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 29,902 | -18 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 29,920 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 29,920 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
156 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 77 | 49.4% | |
| 👍 | 29 | 18.6% | |
| 😁 | 16 | 10.3% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 9.62% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 4.49% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 3.85% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 3.21% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.641% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2025 to 31 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
时代在改变,游戏要继续
🎉4❤2👍1🤔1
比特币新高🔥
👏14👍9❤5🎉2😁2
吨er们!TON 在昨天宣布可以通过质押十万美金等额的代币来换取迪拜的 Goleden Visa,在此之前,Golden Visa 需要满足以下条件: 1️⃣ 房地产投资:购买价值200万阿联酋迪拉姆(约54.5万美元)以上的房产。 2️⃣ 银行存款:在阿联酋银行存入一定金额(通常为200万迪拉姆)。 3️⃣ 其他类别:如高技能人才、科学家、优秀学生等,需满足特定条件。 这样比较下来,质押 3 年的 10 万美元 TON 的计划最为划算。 但是,该消息在今日凌晨遭到了迪拜官方的 否认,澄清目前并没有开展关于加密货币这类的 Visa 窗口。 但这并不代表此消息是假消息,因为 TON 基金会主席多次澄清,此消息的确是真的,并且根据一些熟悉此事情的 KOL 也表示,TON 基金会可能是通过第三方合作来促成此事。 而根据 TON 的价格走势来看,中文媒体方程式新闻 似乎在凌晨时分对 TON 进行了做空。此媒体在凌晨 4:49 …
❤21😁4🎉1
吨er们!在近期市场有所回暖的背景下,TON 生态系统的龙头基建公司 TOP 在今日公布已完成 2850 万美元的 A 轮融资,估值达到 10 亿美元。 根据 财富周刊 报道,Ribbit Capital 领投了此轮融资,加密货币风险投资公司 Pantera Capital 也参与其中。The Open Platform 创始人兼首席执行官 Andrew Rogozov 向《财富》杂志透露,此次融资仅占股权融资的 5%,且不包含加密货币的分配。他还补充道,The Open Platform(也称 TOP)已在多轮融资中筹集了超过 7000 万美元的资金。 TOP 目前坐拥 TON 生态几乎所有最有影响力的基建,例如钱包 Tonkeeper、DEX Ston.fi 、NFT 交易市场 Getgems 以及最重要的 @Wallet 钱包。 换句话说,股权融资而不涉及到代币分发,其实透露出两个信息点: 1️⃣TOP 目前旗下的协…
❤8👍2🔥1
大家认为 Blum 这样的项目真的对 TON 生态有利吗?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
吨er们!今天给大家分享一下近期加密货币市场整体的情况,虽然目前加密货币行业的合规度越来越高,各国股票市场对于加密货币题材的炒作热度越来越高,但目前我们似乎实际处于行业较为低谷的阶段。🤧 1️⃣首先是整个市场的流动性依旧不足,其实不光是 TON,而是整个山寨市场都处于一个韧性极差的阶段,没有真正持续的交易资金,市场近期关于稳定币、美股的概念炒作仅仅停留在证券市场。 2️⃣比特币现在处于前高附近,但山寨的情绪依旧不见好转,一旦比特币进行小幅回调,包括 TON 在内的一众山寨币很可能陷入新一轮的下跌当中。 3️⃣太多新资产的发行者,都并不是以运营一个项目的态度去发行资产,而是为了收割一波流动性,将上所作为一个项目运行周期最后的一个环节,注重协议本身盈利能力和基本面的项目早就陷入了运营危机,因为市场中留存的散户资金早已被 Bad Apple 收割殆尽。 4️⃣除了比特币以外的加密资产并没有一个标杆性质的标的,ETH、SOL 都…
❤9👍2😁2👏1
吨er们!Telegram Gift 开始了新一轮的赋能,并且在 基金会高层 目前看起来依旧会持续推进它的持续发展。 目前的更新分为两点: 1. @CapsXGame 游戏开始对 Gift 持有人进行奖励,在不需要任何交易行为的情况下可以获得代币奖励。 2. Gift 资产目前可以进行抵押,并换取 TON 的流动性。 从底层逻辑来看,Gift 目前有的两点更新像是项目方自发地对 Gift 持有人的空投,以及 DeFi 基础生态上,基于借贷协议对 Gift 资产的支持。 是从 Gift 本身 NFT 的属性出发来作出系列优化,这让人联想到了 Gamefi 早期的发展路径。通过给 NFT 添加 DeFi 激励来增加资产的流动性与纸面价值。 但与 Gamefi 中的 NFT 不同,Gift 的定价权并未卷入上述那类游戏的经济系统当中,因为目前看来都是游戏主动对 Gift 进行赋能。 目前 Gift 最好的基本盘依旧是不错的…
❤4😁1
吨er们!最近加密货币市场以及总体金融市场都因为一些利空消息,今天我带大家梳理一下目前这些消息的发展情况。 1️⃣马斯克与特朗普“分手” 近期,特朗普与马斯克之间的关系因一系列公开争执而显著恶化,争端主要围绕政策分歧和个人恩怨展开。以下为主要事件的总结: 1.马斯克在2024年美国总统选举中为特朗普提供了超过2.5亿美元的竞选资金支持,并在其第二任期内短暂担任政府效率部(Department of Government Efficiency, DOGE)的负责人,致力于削减联邦政府开支。 但马斯克在六月退出该部门,疑似受到排挤,并在不久后公开批评特朗普推动的《大而美法案》(Big Beautiful Bill),称其为“令人作呕的丑恶之举”,指责该法案将大幅增加美国预算赤字(预计增加约1.5万亿美元)。特朗普则反驳称马斯克的批评源于电动车补贴被削减的不满,并质疑马斯克的政治动机。 基于此,两人展开了一系列的唇枪舌战,其…
❤5
吨er们!最近 Telegram Gift 的涨幅有所出圈,其中以 Plush Pepe 为首的 Gift 都迎来了阶段性涨幅。 其中许多 NFT 市场的 OG 已经进入到该领域,例如近期 Abstractchain 以及 Pudgy Penguins 的创始人 购买了他的第一个 Plush Pepe。 可以说赚钱效应已经吸引到了二级市场足够的目光 众所周知,NFT 市场的流动性相对于代币市场来讲差距较大,因此,目前已经爆发过几轮NFT热潮的公链和大的 IP NFT 其实相较乏力,因为大量的套牢盘意味着特定价格区间会有较大的抛压。 但对于 TON 而言,目前 NFT 市场依旧有较好的势头,除了 +888 匿名号码的繁荣,目前 Gift 也还处于市场兴起时的增长期。 这样的阶段从筹码上来看没有形成套牢盘,所以 Fomo 情绪往往能够带动市场的热潮,可以理解成 BTC 新高的阶段。 因此 TON 从公链的发展阶段来讲,是…
❤2👍2
😄封面图由 Grok 生成 吨er们!今天给大家梳理一下近期 Elon Musk 的 Grok AI 和 Durov 的 Telegram 聊成的战略合作。 ❗首先,我认为目前 Telegram 和 Grok 的合作仍然处于战略布局阶段,虽然 Durov 曾宣布 xAI 将向 Telegram 支付 3 亿美元(现金和股权形式),并分享通过 Telegram 销售的 xAI 订阅收入的 50%。 但 Elon Musk 在 Durov 放出消息后,表示还没有达成最终的协议。根据 Durov 公布的方案,xAI 与 Telegram 的合作大概率包含了 TON 的相关细节,因为目前 Telegram 变现的重要途径就包含了 TON。 🧑🎓但由于目前还没有正式的最终协议公布,因此,Elon 和 Durov 可能还要针对利益开展漫长的拉扯期间。 此前我们已经介绍了 Grok 在 Telegram 上的运行情况,目前 Gro…
❤5😁3
有趣的是,基金会新主席主导的基金 Kingsway Capital,就在近期参与了 Bitcoin 生态交易所的融资。 该交易所虽然会接入 RWA 资产(证券、黄金、石油等),但最终结算将只通过 BTC。 而 TON 生态也即将推出 BTCFI 相关产品,是否能有联动?让我们期待一下。
🔥3❤1
吨er们!近期 TON 基金会可以说是在加密货币合规领域做出了极大的跟进,首先近 20 年的外汇银行业务经验、曾在汇丰银行和法国巴黎银行等全球金融机构担任高级职位的 Martin Masser 成为 TON 的增长主管。 ❗️Martin Masser 的工作经历整理如下: 1️⃣HSBC(汇丰银行) - 传统银行职位(具体年限未公开,约 2000 年代至 2010 年代) Martin Masser 在 HSBC 担任过多个与金融服务相关的职位,具体角色未在公开信息中详细说明,但可能涉及投资银行、资产管理或交易相关工作,鉴于其后来的 DeFi 经验。 并参与传统金融产品的设计与执行,可能包括财富管理、衍生品交易或机构客户服务。HSBC 作为全球领先的银行,其工作环境为 Martin 提供了国际金融市场的广泛经验,特别是在支付、结算和风险管理领域。 2️⃣BNP Paribas(法国巴黎银行) - 传统银行职位(具体年限…
❤3🔥2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Tonnypowerbewithyou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
大家认为 Blum 这样的项目真的对 TON 生态有利吗?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你认为 TON 在近期会迎来久违的上涨吗?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你有持有 Telegram Gifts 吗?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你认为 tgBTC、RWA 能够带来 TON DeFi 生态的增长吗?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2025 to 31 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,303,232 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Tonnypowerbewithyou named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ton力十足” (@Tonnypowerbewithyou), 29,629 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tonnypowerbewithyou.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.