Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Odaily资讯速递

Channel

Odaily资讯速递

@Odaily_News

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,010subscribers

-336 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001525105897
TypeChannel
Username@Odaily_News
Description本频道推送加密世界精选重要资讯 畅游Web3👇 官网:https://www.odaily.news/ APP下载:https://download.odaily.com 官方X:https://x.com/odailychina 交流群:https://t.me/Odaily_GoldenApe
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Odaily_News

Growth

17,01017,34617,1786 August 2026 — 17,346 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,346 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,323 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,265 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,233 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,210 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,174 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,151 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,123 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,093 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,048 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,010 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 11 days, net -336. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,960–17,396 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:4517,010-38
16 Aug 2026, 07:2817,048-45
14 Aug 2026, 16:0517,093-30
13 Aug 2026, 03:1417,123-28
12 Aug 2026, 04:0417,151-23
11 Aug 2026, 05:3317,174-36
10 Aug 2026, 05:2717,210-23
9 Aug 2026, 08:3217,233-32
8 Aug 2026, 06:1217,265-58
7 Aug 2026, 07:1117,323-23
6 Aug 2026, 04:4517,346no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:3817,346first reading

Engagement

348 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.89%
avg views ÷ 17,010 subscribers
Avg views / post
151
348 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.509%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
348
of 348 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 348 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held348 (5 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total52,654
Reactions total14
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
47
Links
162,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
753.8%
👎646.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 348 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 348 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC69 viewsread 17 August 2026

城堡证券:美联储政策或令美债收益率维持高位,长期利率风险上升 Odaily星球日报讯 城堡证券表示,美联储当前政策路径正在推动长期美债收益率维持在数十年高位,并可能给市场带来更广泛风险。尽管近期通胀和就业数据有所降温,但美国 30 年期国债收益率仍一度升至 5.28%,创 19 年来最高水平,显示市场对长期通胀压力和财政风险仍保持警惕。该机构认为,通胀压力尚未完全消退,美联储下一次政策决定仍存在较大不确定性,利率路径可能继续成为影响资产价格的重要因素。在人工智能领域,Citadel 更看好云基础设施和大型云计算企业,而非前沿 AI 模型开发商。该机构倾向于投资拥有算力基础设施优势的“超级规模云厂商”(hyperscalers),包括微软(MSFT)和谷歌母公司 Alphabet(GOOGL)。 原文链接 https://www.odaily.news/zh-CN/newsflash/510243

17 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC110 viewsread 17 August 2026

汇丰:美联储缩减持仓将使美国国债更依赖价格敏感型买家 Odaily星球日报讯 汇丰策略师 Dhiraj Narula 和经济学家 Ryan Wang 在一份报告中表示,如果美联储缩减其持有的美国国债,美国国债市场可能会更加依赖对价格更为敏感的买家。他们写道:“美联储持仓减少仍将对美国国债市场产生影响。如果系统公开市场账户(SOMA)持仓的增长跟不上美国国债规模的增长,无论这是由于被动或相对量化紧缩导致,还是持仓仅温和增长导致,最终都必须由对价格敏感的投资者吸收更大比例的政府融资需求。” 原文链接 https://www.odaily.news/zh-CN/newsflash/510238

17 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC118 viewsread 17 August 2026

Compound Finance批准创纪录5200万美元预算,转向机构客户 Odaily星球日报讯 去中心化借贷协议 Compound Finance 完成领导层调整,并批准 5200 万美元创纪录预算,该协议总锁仓价值已从 2021 年峰值 120 亿美元降至 12 亿美元,正寻求恢复增长。据悉,Compound Finance 一开始转向服务机构客户,开发现实世界资产产品、合作伙伴集成方案及信贷基础设施,以满足传统金融的合规和技术标准。 Compound Finance 的新领导团队和大额预算与去中心化金融领域服务金融机构的整体转向一致。该领域整体资产此前因市场疲软和安全漏洞事件减少。(CoinDesk) 原文链接 https://www.odaily.news/zh-CN/newsflash/510236

17 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC119 viewsread 17 August 2026

英伟达股价上涨1.05%,创6月2日以来最高水平 Odaily星球日报讯 根据 MSX.COM 数据,英伟达股价上涨 1.05%,报 227.525 美元/股,为 6 月 2 日以来最高水平,总市值报 5.51 万亿美元。 原文链接 https://www.odaily.news/zh-CN/newsflash/510234

17 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC145 viewsread 17 August 2026

某ETH交易者高买低卖,两个月波段操作亏损约41.4万美元 Odaily星球日报讯 据 Lookonchain 监测,一名 ETH 交易者近期再次以较高价格买回 1674 枚 ETH,价值约 319 万美元,买入价格约为 1906 美元。Lookonchain 表示,该交易者长期存在“低价卖出、高价买入”的操作模式。两个月前,该地址仍持有 1891 枚 ETH,而目前仅剩 1674 枚 ETH,通过频繁波段交易累计减少 217 枚 ETH,按当前价格计算损失约 41.4 万美元。Lookonchain 指出,对于该类交易者而言,频繁交易不仅未能提升收益,反而因市场波动导致资产缩水,并表示:“有时候,简单持有可能比盲目交易更好。” 原文链接 https://www.odaily.news/zh-CN/newsflash/510231

17 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC142 viewsread 17 August 2026

伊朗:已为美国履行谅解备忘录设定最后期限 Odaily星球日报讯 一名伊朗高级官员在接受采访时表示,伊朗已为美国全面履行伊美谅解备忘录设定了数周的最后期限,伊朗不会无限期等待美国继续实施海上封锁。该官员表示,由于“与美国达成永久停战协议的努力陷入僵局”,伊朗已决定将其政策“从防御性转向全面进攻性”。该官员说,如果外交努力失败,“伊朗人已准备好将升级霍尔木兹海峡及(中东)地区的紧张局势。伊朗的时间表将通过调解国传递给美国。”美国和伊朗 6 月 17 日公布谅解备忘录正式文本,其中第三条内容是:美国与伊朗承诺在最多 60 天内进行谈判并达成最终协议。8 月 17 日,谅解备忘录所设定的 60 天谈判窗口期期满,由于在霍尔木兹海峡等问题上存在严重分歧,美伊谈判陷入僵局,没有取得实质性进展。 (央视新闻) 原文链接 https://www.odaily.news/zh-CN/newsflash/510227

17 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC124 viewsread 17 August 2026

寒武纪56.1万股股权激励股份将于8月20日上市流通,124名员工人均股票价值557.15万元 Odaily星球日报讯 寒武纪公告,公司近日收到中国结算上海分公司出具的《过户登记确认书》《证券变更登记证明》,公司完成了 2023 年限制性股票激励计划(简称“本激励计划”)预留授予部分第一个归属期的股份登记工作。本次归属的激励对象人数为 124 人。本次股票上市流通总数为 56.1 万股。本次股票上市流通日期为 2026 年 8 月 20 日。本次限制性股票归属数量为 59.76 万股,其中 3.66 万股来源于公司回购的公司 A 股普通股股票,56.1 万股来源于公司向激励对象定向发行的公司 A 股普通股股票。以寒武纪今日收盘价 1156 元/股估算,59.76 万股股票价值合计 6.9 亿元,对应每人平均股票价值 557.15 万元。 原文链接 https://www.odaily.news/zh-CN/newsflash

17 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC121 viewsread 17 August 2026

GitHub遭遇服务异常,API、网页访问及Copilot等多项功能出现性能下降 Odaily星球日报讯 GitHub 官方状态页面显示,目前其平台正在经历服务异常,多个核心功能出现可用性下降。根据最新公告,GitHub 网页端和 API 请求错误率一度达到约 20%,仓库归档下载以及原始仓库内容(raw repository content)下载错误率约为 50%。此外,SAML 和 OIDC 身份认证、SCIM 以及 Team Sync 功能也受到影响。目前受影响的服务包括:Pull Requests(拉取请求)性能下降;Issues(问题追踪)性能下降;Actions(自动化工作流)性能下降;Webhooks(网络钩子)性能下降;API Requests 出现异常;GitHub Copilot 出现可用性下降。GitHub 表示,团队正在持续调查此次事件的根本原因,并将在获得更多信息后进一步更新状态。截至目前,GitHu

17 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC125 viewsread 17 August 2026

Anthropic与OpenAI或限制企业API获取最强AI模型,引发竞争风险担忧 Odaily星球日报讯 Anthropic 和 OpenAI 持续开发面向特定行业的 AI 应用和功能,引发部分企业客户担忧——这些客户未来可能需要直接与自己的 AI 供应商展开竞争。设计软件公司 Canva 近期便面临类似困境。此前,多数企业客户一直认为,Anthropic 和 OpenAI 会始终通过 API 形式向外部企业提供其最先进的 AI 模型,使企业能够基于这些模型开发自身产品。然而,随着两家公司越来越深入地推出行业定制化 AI 应用,部分客户开始担心,Anthropic 和 OpenAI 可能会优先将最强大的 AI 能力用于自有产品,而非通过 API 开放给企业客户。这一变化可能影响企业对 AI 基础设施供应商的长期依赖模式。过去,企业通常将 OpenAI、Anthropic 等模型提供商视为底层技术供应商;但随着 AI 公司向应

17 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC119 viewsread 17 August 2026

摩根士丹利看好亚马逊AI增长潜力:AWS或成为万亿美元业务 Odaily星球日报讯 摩根士丹利表示,若亚马逊(Amazon)云计算业务 AWS 增长进一步加速,公司股价到 2027 年底可能达到 500 美元,较当前水平接近翻倍。摩根士丹利的乐观情景基于 AWS 未来有望发展成为年收入规模达 1 万亿美元的业务,主要驱动力包括人工智能算力需求增长以及数据中心扩容。随着 AI 基础设施竞争升温,亚马逊正在大幅增加 AI 相关投入。公司近期将 2026 年人工智能资本支出预期上调至 2200 亿美元,重点用于扩大云计算基础设施、AI 算力和数据中心能力。摩根士丹利认为,AWS 将在 AI 浪潮中继续扮演核心角色,随着企业加速采用生成式 AI 服务,对云计算和推理算力的需求可能进一步推动 AWS 收入增长。不过,摩根士丹利目前维持对亚马逊的基准目标价为 335 美元,较当前股价约有 28%的上涨空间。500 美元目标价属于更乐观情景

17 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC136 viewsread 17 August 2026

美国财政部就GENIUS法案稳定币实施草案公开征求意见 Odaily星球日报讯 美国财政部(U.S. Department of the Treasury)8月17日发布关于《GENIUS法案》(Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins)实施细则的拟议规则制定通知(NPRM),并向公众征求意见,以推进美国支付型稳定币监管框架落地。美国财政部长Scott Bessent表示,特朗普政府和国会推动通过GENIUS法案,为支付型稳定币建立了“具有里程碑意义的监管框架和明确规则”,财政部正在加速落实相关制度。他表示,财政部希望通过提供监管确定性,支持企业在美国创新发展,同时巩固美元作为全球储备货币的地位,并推动美国成为全球加密资产中心。根据GENIUS法案,预计自2027年1月18日起,任何主体若要在美国发行支付型稳定币,通常必须获得适当的联邦或

17 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC123 viewsread 17 August 2026

富国银行下调黄金2026年底目标区间至4,900-5,100美元/盎司 Odaily星球日报讯 富国银行将黄金 2026 年底目标区间从每盎司 5,300-5,500 美元下调至 4,900-5,100 美元;2027 年底目标区间从每盎司 5,800-6,000 美元下调至 5,400-5,600 美元。 原文链接 https://www.odaily.news/zh-CN/newsflash/510206

Showing the 12 most recent of 348 posts we hold for @Odaily_News. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 163,860 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

分叉财经(crypto news)
@fenchacaij · 270,993
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
Btok.com Official Channel
@BTOKOFFICIALCHANNEL · 333,996
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 August 2026
金色财经
@jinsecaijinpingdao · 254,626
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
Btok News
@BtokMedia · 306,637
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
Toncoin 中文频道
@toncoin_cn · 144,026
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
Floki & TokenFi 中文社区入口
@flokiinuchina · 211,981
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Odaily资讯速递” (@Odaily_News), 17,010 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Odaily_News.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.