赚了几个月了,每天都在数钱,部分会员已经麻木了,你懂那种感觉吗? 一定要敬畏市场哦!不能觉得交易容易,掉以轻心!
🏆7❤5👍1
Signed 峰哥

Channel
@TraderfenggeTG
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
33,038subscribers
+373 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001565179412 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TraderfenggeTG |
| Description | 峰哥唯一私信链接:https://t.me/Traderfengge 峰哥YouTube比特币分析:https://youtube.com/@traderfengge 峰哥YouTube 美股分析:https://youtube.com/@fenggemeigu 峰哥X官方账号:https://twitter.com/Traderfengge 峰哥美股电报社区:https://t.me/fenggemg |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TraderfenggeTG |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 33,038 | +185 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:20 | 32,853 | +29 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 32,824 | +42 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 32,782 | +17 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 32,765 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:19 | 32,764 | -11 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 32,775 | -27 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:00 | 32,802 | +27 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:45 | 32,775 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:25 | 32,777 | +14 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:46 | 32,763 | +12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 32,751 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:08 | 32,759 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 32,755 | +15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 32,740 | +7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 32,733 | +15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 32,718 | +50 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 32,668 | +18 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 32,650 | +28 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 32,622 | first reading |
479 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 188 of 211 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 479 (6 August 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 589,987 |
| Reactions total | 2,222 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 08:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,654 reactions across 378 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,842 | 50.4% | |
| 👍 | 1,126 | 30.8% | |
| 🔥 | 220 | 6.02% | |
| 👏 | 126 | 3.45% | |
| 🎉 | 61 | 1.67% | |
| 🍓 | 54 | 1.48% | |
| 💯 | 44 | 1.20% | |
| 🙏 | 42 | 1.15% | |
| 🤩 | 29 | 0.794% | |
| 🏆 | 26 | 0.712% | |
| 💋 | 24 | 0.657% | |
| 😍 | 24 | 0.657% | |
| 🍾 | 21 | 0.575% | |
| 🥰 | 15 | 0.411% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 397 of the 479 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,654 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 479 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
赚了几个月了,每天都在数钱,部分会员已经麻木了,你懂那种感觉吗? 一定要敬畏市场哦!不能觉得交易容易,掉以轻心!
🏆7❤5👍1
Signed 峰哥
📈BTC现货浮盈:28000点 💸收益48% 📈SOL现货浮盈:47点 💸收益63% 📈LTC现货浮盈:17点 💸收益32% ✔️现货在手,永不踏空,让它们继续奔跑起来吧!
👍3❤2
Signed 峰哥
来咯!
👏9❤5👍2🔥2🎉1
Signed 峰哥
会员群以太坊爆赚80点🆒🆒
Signed 峰哥
咱们不吹牛,不口嗨,只看行动,这10单连胜策略日期可以对照,记录都在频道里,就这样,3万多人都看到的事实!
❤2👏1
Signed 峰哥
看到大家都赚钱了,也是我最开心的事情了,你们和我一样敢拼敢干,都是行动的巨人,为你们点赞👍👍
❤11🍾1🎉1
Signed 峰哥
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 峰哥
当峰哥处于连续爆发的时候,一对一会员能盈利多少? 9月19日到10月1日这位朋友共计获利196238美金,峰哥策略给的好,这位朋友整体跟随情况也不错,部分策略他提前跑了,但不影响最终大赚!
👍12❤2🍾1👏1
Signed 峰哥
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4💯1
Signed 峰哥
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Signed 峰哥
比特币看扩张至9万上破,观点不变。
❤14👏2🍾1
Signed 峰哥
https://youtu.be/Z3PjV1oGKuI?si=QUZ54DxB9LkWGnnA
Signed 峰哥
Showing the 12 most recent of 479 posts we hold for @TraderfenggeTG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
你认为BNB的涨幅,能否跑赢比特币?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你今年情况
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你的虚拟货币交易生涯整体情况
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你认为横盘结束后?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 479 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“比特币峰哥公开频道” (@TraderfenggeTG), 33,038 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TraderfenggeTG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.