Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 比特币峰哥公开频道

Channel

比特币峰哥公开频道

@TraderfenggeTG

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

33,038subscribers

+373 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001565179412
TypeChannel
Username@TraderfenggeTG
Description峰哥唯一私信链接:https://t.me/Traderfengge 峰哥YouTube比特币分析:https://youtube.com/@traderfengge 峰哥YouTube 美股分析:https://youtube.com/@fenggemeigu 峰哥X官方账号:https://twitter.com/Traderfengge 峰哥美股电报社区:https://t.me/fenggemg
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TraderfenggeTG

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

32,55633,03832,7977 August 2026 — 32,665 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,665 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,666 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,658 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,655 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,645 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,637 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,608 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,603 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,600 subscribers15 August 2026 — 32,584 subscribers17 August 2026 — 32,574 subscribers18 August 2026 — 32,563 subscribers19 August 2026 — 32,556 subscribers20 August 2026 — 32,595 subscribers21 August 2026 — 32,622 subscribers23 August 2026 — 32,650 subscribers24 August 2026 — 32,668 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,718 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,733 subscribers28 August 2026 — 32,740 subscribers29 August 2026 — 32,755 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,759 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,751 subscribers1 September 2026 — 32,763 subscribers1 September 2026 — 32,777 subscribers3 September 2026 — 32,775 subscribers4 September 2026 — 32,802 subscribers7 September 2026 — 32,775 subscribers10 September 2026 — 32,764 subscribers12 September 2026 — 32,765 subscribers14 September 2026 — 32,782 subscribers16 September 2026 — 32,824 subscribers18 September 2026 — 32,853 subscribers30 September 2026 — 33,038 subscribers7 August 202630 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 55 days, net +373. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,484–33,110 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Sept 2026, 21:5833,038+185
18 Sept 2026, 04:2032,853+29
16 Sept 2026, 00:4132,824+42
14 Sept 2026, 04:3932,782+17
12 Sept 2026, 10:3932,765+1
10 Sept 2026, 09:1932,764-11
7 Sept 2026, 00:5632,775-27
4 Sept 2026, 11:0032,802+27
3 Sept 2026, 01:4532,775-2
1 Sept 2026, 23:2532,777+14
1 Sept 2026, 00:4632,763+12
30 Aug 2026, 21:2832,751-8
30 Aug 2026, 00:0832,759+4
29 Aug 2026, 02:2632,755+15
28 Aug 2026, 00:3432,740+7
26 Aug 2026, 22:5332,733+15
26 Aug 2026, 02:0432,718+50
24 Aug 2026, 23:3432,668+18
23 Aug 2026, 13:5632,650+28
21 Aug 2026, 22:2732,622first reading

Engagement

479 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.46%
avg views ÷ 33,038 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,800
211 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.418%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
211
of 479 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 188 of 211 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026
Posts held479 (6 August 2026 – 2 October 2026)
Views total589,987
Reactions total2,222
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Oct 2026, 08:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈11,300
Videos
≈28
Links
≈1,870

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,654 reactions across 378 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,84250.4%
👍1,12630.8%
🔥2206.02%
👏1263.45%
🎉611.67%
🍓541.48%
💯441.20%
🙏421.15%
🤩290.794%
🏆260.712%
💋240.657%
😍240.657%
🍾210.575%
🥰150.411%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 397 of the 479 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,654 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 479 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Oct 2026, 05:47 UTC≈1,410 views13 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

赚了几个月了,每天都在数钱,部分会员已经麻木了,你懂那种感觉吗? 一定要敬畏市场哦!不能觉得交易容易,掉以轻心!

🏆7❤5👍1

Signed 峰哥

2 Oct 2026, 05:38 UTC≈1,420 views5 reactionsread 2 October 2026

📈BTC现货浮盈:28000点 💸收益48% 📈SOL现货浮盈:47点 💸收益63% 📈LTC现货浮盈:17点 💸收益32% ✔️现货在手,永不踏空,让它们继续奔跑起来吧!

👍3❤2

Signed 峰哥

2 Oct 2026, 04:36 UTC≈2,080 views19 reactionsread 2 October 2026

来咯!

👏9❤5👍2🔥2🎉1

Signed 峰哥

2 Oct 2026, 04:33 UTC≈2,100 viewsread 2 October 2026
Photo

会员群以太坊爆赚80点🆒🆒

Signed 峰哥

2 Oct 2026, 04:06 UTC≈2,120 views3 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

咱们不吹牛,不口嗨,只看行动,这10单连胜策略日期可以对照,记录都在频道里,就这样,3万多人都看到的事实!

❤2👏1

Signed 峰哥

2 Oct 2026, 04:03 UTC≈1,920 views13 reactionsread 2 October 2026

看到大家都赚钱了,也是我最开心的事情了,你们和我一样敢拼敢干,都是行动的巨人,为你们点赞👍👍

❤11🍾1🎉1

Signed 峰哥

1 Oct 2026, 03:08 UTC≈2,910 views16 reactionsread 1 October 2026

当峰哥处于连续爆发的时候,一对一会员能盈利多少? 9月19日到10月1日这位朋友共计获利196238美金,峰哥策略给的好,这位朋友整体跟随情况也不错,部分策略他提前跑了,但不影响最终大赚!

👍12❤2🍾1👏1

Signed 峰哥

1 Oct 2026, 03:08 UTC≈2,840 views5 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤4💯1

Signed 峰哥

1 Oct 2026, 03:08 UTC≈2,700 views1 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤1

Signed 峰哥

1 Oct 2026, 02:48 UTC≈2,490 views17 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

比特币看扩张至9万上破,观点不变。

❤14👏2🍾1

Signed 峰哥

1 Oct 2026, 02:48 UTC≈2,530 viewsread 1 October 2026

https://youtu.be/Z3PjV1oGKuI?si=QUZ54DxB9LkWGnnA

Signed 峰哥

Showing the 12 most recent of 479 posts we hold for @TraderfenggeTG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Sept 2026, 03:44 UTCAnonymous Poll433 voters

你认为BNB的涨幅,能否跑赢比特币?

  1. 能57%
  2. 不能44%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTCAnonymous Poll949 voters

你今年情况

  1. 赚钱42%
  2. 亏钱58%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTCAnonymous Poll949 voters

你的虚拟货币交易生涯整体情况

  1. 赚钱32%
  2. 亏钱68%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 02:50 UTCAnonymous Poll1,740 voters approx.

你认为横盘结束后?

  1. 📈38%
  2. 📉37%
  3. 看不清,摸不透,说不出。25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 479 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

比特币飞扬公开频道
@feiyangkanbi · 23,542
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
舒琴比特币行情资讯(其他均为仿冒)
@bitebishuqin · 40,601
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
以太坊币圈行情分析频道
@btc18688 · 26,143
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 September 2026
提阿非羅TIABTC
@tiaalert · 20,030
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 September 2026
Leo-加密貨幣頻道
@Xboshi1 · 20,885
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 September 2026
Telo News 简体中文 - 加密货币|DeFi |Web3
@telonews_cn · 83,174
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
Crypto_獵捕者合約帝
@oobbb1 · 21,349
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
金色财经新闻频道
@jinse2017 · 22,688
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 September 2026
Toncoin 中文频道
@toncoin_cn · 140,488
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
欧易OKX公告
@OKXAnnouncements_CN · 45,097
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
分叉财经(crypto news)
@fenchacaij · 250,470
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
金色财经/币圈快讯7*24小时
@jinseBTC · 23,731
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
BlockBeats
@theblockbeats · 37,622
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
PANews Web3丨加密货币丨区块链新闻频道
@ChannelPANews · 23,918
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 September 2026
Odaily资讯速递
@Odaily_News · 20,495
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 September 2026
動區動趨 BlockTempo⚡️區塊鏈 加密貨幣新聞
@blocktemponews · 39,002
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Btok News
@BtokMedia · 284,798
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“比特币峰哥公开频道” (@TraderfenggeTG), 33,038 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TraderfenggeTG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.