Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Toncoin 中文频道

@toncoin_cn

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

144,445subscribers

-719 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001795582430
TypeChannel
Username@toncoin_cn
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/toncoin_cn

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

144,445145,164144,804.55 August 2026 — 145,164 subscribers6 August 2026 — 145,162 subscribers6 August 2026 — 145,162 subscribers7 August 2026 — 145,082 subscribers8 August 2026 — 144,999 subscribers9 August 2026 — 144,902 subscribers10 August 2026 — 144,760 subscribers11 August 2026 — 144,646 subscribers11 August 2026 — 144,555 subscribers12 August 2026 — 144,445 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -719. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 144,337–145,272 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:33144,445-110
11 Aug 2026, 22:22144,555-91
11 Aug 2026, 00:27144,646-114
10 Aug 2026, 02:22144,760-142
9 Aug 2026, 00:53144,902-97
8 Aug 2026, 03:16144,999-83
7 Aug 2026, 01:41145,082-80
6 Aug 2026, 01:31145,162no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:10145,162-2
5 Aug 2026, 22:10145,164first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

429 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
29167.8%
👍8219.1%
🔥306.99%
🤯133.03%
👏71.63%
61.40%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 429reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 24 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Jun 2026, 21:40 UTC≈29,900 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤑TON 现已更名为 GRAM! 代币代号、Logo 和名称将改变,其他一切保持不变。 同一条链。同一网络。同一开发团队。同一个社区。 您的持仓将以 1:1 比例自动转换为 GRAM。无需兑换、无需迁移、无需任何操作。 ————————— 🫶为什么是 GRAM? Gram 曾是 TON 最初白皮书中代币的原始名称。我们正回归本源,开启新的篇章。这次品牌更新为接下来的发展奠定了基础。 TON 仍然是区块链的名称。代币名称为 GRAM。 Make TON Great Again 七步计划中的第 4 步。 ————————— ✅ 主流钱包已上线 • Wallet (@cryptowallet_news_en) • MyTonWallet (@MyTonWalletEn) • Tonkeeper (@tonkeeper_news) 您的余额已显示为 GRAM。 ————————— 🫡 各交易所时间安排 Bitg

47🤯7👍1🔥1

1 Jun 2026, 18:00 UTC≈30,000 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🪙 Toncoin 更名投票 —— 社区治理提案 过去几个月里,TON 发生了显著变化。Telegram 正在网络中发挥越来越重要的作用,并正成为其最大的验证者。区块链性能提升至原来的 10 倍,交易手续费下降了 6 倍。Gram 是 TON 创始人在最初的 TON 白皮书中为该代币确定的名称,并且这一名称始终保留在代码库中。 因此,Telegram 提议将原生代币名称从 Toncoin 更改为 Gram。现在正是恢复其原始名称的合适时机。 区块链本身仍然是 TON / The Open Network,变化的只有代币名称和代码(Ticker)。余额、地址、智能合约、NFT、质押、DeFi 等均不会受到影响。无需兑换、跨链、申领或迁移,也无需用户采取任何操作。 ⚠️ 任何要求你“领取 GRAM”或“迁移 TON”的网站、机器人或链接都是诈骗。 投票说明 本次投票将在 TON Vote 上持续一周。TON Vote 是

29👍64🔥2

15 May 2026, 18:50 UTC≈31,700 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

$100,400 刚刚颁给了 TON Consensus Challenge 的 15 位获奖者。 🧠 地球上最聪明的工程师们——其中一些配备了忠诚的 AI 伙伴——帮助我们最大化了新共识机制的安全性。 🏆 Telegram 竞赛提供丰厚的奖金——并且是加入我们工程团队的唯一途径。

13👍10🔥1

12 May 2026, 18:26 UTC≈29,800 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌍 凭借分布在 6 大洲的 400 个验证者,TON 是地球上最去中心化的区块链网络之一。 🧑‍💻 Telegram 成为最大的验证者,为主要交易所和托管机构打开了大门,使他们可以在不增加中心化风险的情况下质押 TON。

16👍6🔥1

12 May 2026, 07:02 UTC≈23,800 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Acton 简介 —— 全新现代 TON 智能合约开发工具链 Acton 覆盖完整的开发生命周期:项目创建、测试、调试、dApp 集成、部署与验证。 采用 CLI-first 设计,无论是开发者还是 AI 智能体都能自然流畅地使用。 1. 一体化工具链,而非零散工具集合 在围绕 Tolk 构建的统一环境中,即可完成 TON 合约的创建、构建、测试、代码检查、格式化、部署和验证。 2. 更紧凑的构建-测试-调试循环 直接使用 Tolk 语言编写测试,快速运行,对失败交易进行调试,并查看链上实际发生的情况。 3. 内置安全保障 代码覆盖率、模糊测试、变异测试、Gas 分析以及 CI 集成,帮助及早发现回归问题。 4. 原生调试器 支持单步进入、单步跳过、单步退出,实时观察变量,查看调用栈。在区块链语言中带来流畅的 Web2 风格开发体验。 5. 对 AI 智能体友好 现代 CLI 工具可直接作为智能体的运行时环境,并内

27👍6

11 May 2026, 19:55 UTC≈18,100 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🛠 为 TON 开发的速度刚刚提升了 10 倍。新的工具链让智能合约的创建、测试和部署变得简单。 最重要的是,完全支持 AI。 它用一个统一的开发者流程取代了 TON 碎片化的工具栈。开始构建吧!

6🔥2👍1

8 May 2026, 18:04 UTC≈18,700 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🫴 TON 在 50 种最大加密货币中年度质押奖励排名第一。 而且这还不包括该币的价格增长——过去一周翻了一番。

13👍4🔥2

6 May 2026, 16:44 UTC≈18,600 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🏁 TON 在 Layer-1 区块链最终确认时间上领先。 🔗 来源: https://telegra.ph/Comparison-of-Layer-1-blockchains-by-finalization-time-05-01

18👍5🔥3🤯1

5 May 2026, 16:17 UTC≈17,100 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💎 Telegram 成为 TON 的最大验证者加强了去中心化特性。 ✅ 它让其他主要参与者加入验证者池,而不会使网络中心化——Telegram 将作为制衡力量。 📈 随着大家竞争 20%+ 的 APR,越来越多的 TON 被锁定在验证中。

11👍4🔥3

4 May 2026, 15:52 UTC≈17,400 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚡️ TON 的手续费已下降 6 倍 — 接近于零。 下一步 — Telegram 将取代 TON Foundation,成为 TON 的主要推动力量,并成为其最大的验证者。 ⚙️ 重点转向技术优势。 🧩 新的 ton.org 、新开发者工具,新性能升级。 🧭 时间线 — 2-3 周。 🪙 这是“让 TON 再次伟大”的 7 步中的第 3 步。

25🔥3👍1

30 Apr 2026, 13:45 UTC≈19,700 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

关于降低 network fees 的 validators 投票已经开始 请各位 validators 踊跃参与投票。 点击此处查看投票进度。

4👍2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @toncoin_cn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 179,585 of 1,084,084entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Toncoin 中文频道” (@toncoin_cn), 144,445 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/toncoin_cn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.