重要通知🔔 實屬無奈 由於個人精力有限😖 一些做單推薦和佈局不能及時同步 😭 👇決定合併到一個統一頻道 👇 https://t.me/+T8Z4opUkezBhOWJl 幣勝客頻道每天都會佈局新的幣種 歡迎大家加入🎉

Channel
Captain_艦長_幣圈合約戰艦
@Bitgetxizi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,453subscribers
-66 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002079907077 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Bitgetxizi |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Bitgetxizi |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 5,453 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 5,451 | -14 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 5,465 | -13 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 5,478 | -21 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 5,499 | -17 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 5,516 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 5,519 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 5,519 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.87%
- avg views ÷ 5,453 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 102
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,143 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
早上起來就被罵 為什麼罵我呀嗚嗚嗚 原來是我給的劇本又完美實現啦😆
#epic 六個點利潤可以減一次倉✈️ 怎麼樣?爽嗎
#epic 市價小倉多
一個人的盈利可能是偶然❌ 一群人的持續反饋才是實力的證明👌 👉點擊立即加入會員👈
#eth 以太近一個月的行情一直維持在寬幅震盪,走勢非常明顯:打到壓力→回落支撐→反彈壓力→再次回踩支撐。而目前價格再次來到我前面提到的關鍵壓力位1950附近,現在的盤面也上次的盤面是一樣的,只要1950壓力沒有有效突破,行情依舊存在向下回調的機會,並且依然可以作為空單的關注位置!前高則是作為止損防守位📉 反過來,若後續放量有效突破1950,則代表這一輪寬幅震盪結構失效,這時不要急著追多,真正的多單上車機會,反而是在突破後回踩1950確認支撐的這一波📈 所以說目前1950依舊是關鍵的分水嶺,有效突破看回踩做多,承壓則繼續看震盪回落‼️
#cys 黃色支撐同時也是斐波那契0.382位置跌破後,可小倉嘗試一筆空單入場📉注意非市價
#bome 波動很大,穩健的可以先減倉✅
#bome 市價輕倉空
內部會員群又又又又是賺麻的一天~ 👉點擊立即加入會員👈
收到CTSI、CYS的獲利反饋!感謝大家🙏 還是那句話:公開福利單不求回報、不收您一分錢❌ 瞭解我的人自然知道我的實力💪 只需要打開頻道訊息通知跟上即可✅
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Bitgetxizi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@fenchacaij · 268,722
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Captain_艦長_幣圈合約戰艦” (@Bitgetxizi), 5,453 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bitgetxizi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.