Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 金色财经/币圈快讯7*24小时

Channel

金色财经/币圈快讯7*24小时

@jinseBTC

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,946subscribers

+297 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001549184965
TypeChannel
Username@jinseBTC
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/jinseBTC

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@jinseBTC/219785 · this entry14 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC@ppbbb/24609214 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC0.947 minutes
@jinseBTC/229964 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 01:08 UTC@ppbbb/2667333 Nov 2026, 01:13 UTC0.935 minutes
@jinseBTC/221131 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC@ppbbb/24859625 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC0.927 minutes
@jinseBTC/221364 · this entry27 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC@ppbbb/24906127 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC0.922 minutes
@jinseBTC/226644 · this entry9 Oct 2026, 13:29 UTC@ppbbb/2602769 Oct 2026, 13:32 UTC0.923 minutes
@jinseBTC/221612 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC@ppbbb/24954228 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC0.915 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ppbbb14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.916 minutesthis entry (14–0)
@niuniubtc8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.97under a minutethis entry (8–0)
@dnybtc8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.97under a minutethis entry (8–0)
@jinse20175 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.83under a minutethis entry (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,827 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

23,52323,95123,73723,9467 August 202610 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 96 days, net +297. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,459–24,015 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 13:4023,946+6
8 Nov 2026, 22:4023,940-7
7 Nov 2026, 13:3623,947-4
6 Nov 2026, 14:5823,951+14
5 Nov 2026, 17:4523,937+1
4 Nov 2026, 14:1623,936-2
3 Nov 2026, 11:4923,938+12
2 Nov 2026, 11:0623,926+15
1 Nov 2026, 12:0723,911-4
31 Oct 2026, 08:5423,915+10
30 Oct 2026, 10:5923,905+31
29 Oct 2026, 13:3823,874-10
28 Oct 2026, 09:4023,884-10
27 Oct 2026, 09:2823,894-17
26 Oct 2026, 07:4923,911+348
25 Oct 2026, 09:0623,563+40
24 Oct 2026, 08:0023,523-8
23 Oct 2026, 07:5023,531-4
22 Oct 2026, 10:5723,535-19
21 Oct 2026, 01:3123,554first reading

Engagement

2,162 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 122 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.73%
avg views ÷ 23,946 subscribers
Avg views / post
415
680 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.228%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
680
of 2,162 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 65 of 680 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held2,162 (6 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total281,882
Reactions total68
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 05:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈17,200
Links
≈125,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 68 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3737.0%
👍2626.0%
👎1919.0%
💩55.00%
🤣55.00%
😁33.00%
🤡22.00%
👌11.00%
💯11.00%
🤮11.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 September 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 680 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 05:57 UTC1 viewsread 11 November 2026

李林旗下UMX推出 UMI「有米」积分,首期500万积分池开启 【李林旗下UMX推出 UMI「有米」积分,首期500万积分池开启】金色财经报道,11月11日,加密友好型证券平台UMX宣布推出长期用户权益机制UMI「有米」积分,首轮为期7天的「交易赚积分」活动已于11月11日00:00(UTC+8)开启。 11月11日至11月18日期间,用户在UMX进行现货、永续合约、交割合约及期权交易,符合活动规则的交易可获得3倍积分。本期积分池总额为500万UMI,单个账户获取积分不设上限。 UMX表示,UMI「有米」是面向用户推出的长期激励机制,用于记录用户在平台上的参与和贡献,并逐步解锁更多生态权益及专属福利。首轮7天积分活动结束后,UMX将于11月18日开启首发池,积分体系同步进入常态化运营阶段。 UMX致力于连接传统证券与数字资产市场,支持用户在统一账户内使用USDT购买美股和港股,并将持有的证券作为数字资产仓位的保证金。 交流群

11 Nov 2026, 05:41 UTC112 viewsread 11 November 2026

美国现货以太坊ETF昨日净流出132万美元 【美国现货以太坊ETF昨日净流出132万美元】金色财经报道,11月11日,据Trader T监测,美国现货以太坊ETF昨日净流出132万美元。 交流群

11 Nov 2026, 05:41 UTC112 viewsread 11 November 2026

美国现货比特币ETF昨日净流出9500万美元 【美国现货比特币ETF昨日净流出9500万美元】金色财经报道,11月11日,据Trader T监测,美国现货比特币ETF昨日净流出9500万美元。 交流群

11 Nov 2026, 05:17 UTC188 viewsread 11 November 2026

BitMine 2026财年净亏损约63.13亿美元,主要受数字资产未实现亏损拖累 【BitMine 2026财年净亏损约63.13亿美元,主要受数字资产未实现亏损拖累】金色财经报道,11月11日,以太坊财库公司BitMine(BMNR)在提交给美国证券交易委员会的10-K年报中披露,截至2026年8月31日的财年净亏损约63.13亿美元,上财年为净利润3.49亿美元。亏损主要来自数字资产公允价值变动,公司全年录得约62.29亿美元的数字资产未实现亏损,主要因ETH公允价值下降。 BitMine全年营收约1.25亿美元,其中质押及验证业务贡献约1.21亿美元,占总营收约97%。截至财年末,公司持有5,901,837枚ETH及211枚BTC,ETH持仓成本约199.48亿美元,期末公允价值约145.59亿美元。 另据BitMine11月9日发布的持仓更新,截至11月8日,公司ETH持仓已增至6,070,092枚,约占ETH供应量…

11 Nov 2026, 05:05 UTC221 viewsread 11 November 2026

币安合约将上线 HYPEUSDC 和 TRXUSDC 永续合约 【币安合约将上线 HYPEUSDC 和 TRXUSDC 永续合约】金色财经报道,11月11日,据官方消息,币安合约平台将于 11 月 11 日 17:30 上线 HYPEUSDC 永续合约,最高杠杆可达 75 倍;并于 17:35 上线 TRXUSDC 永续合约,最高杠杆同为 75 倍。 交流群

11 Nov 2026, 05:05 UTC218 views0 reactionsread 11 November 2026

美联储古尔斯比:10月CPI近乎令人不安 【美联储古尔斯比:10月CPI近乎令人不安】金色财经报道,芝加哥联储主席奥斯坦·古尔斯比(Austan Goolsbee)当地时间本周二表示,美国10月消费者价格指数(CPI)报告“令人忧虑,近乎令人不安”,美联储必须应对持续偏高的通胀。 他当晚接受PBS NewsHour节目采访时说,原本预期关税及高能源价格等推动物价上涨的因素,到现在应有所消退,但服务通胀仍然顽固,可能是“最令人担忧的部分”。 “我们必须让通胀回到目标,而眼下它正朝错误的方向发展。”古尔斯比说。被问及是否可能加息50个基点时,他表示不愿在政策会议前束缚决策者,所有选项都可讨论,未承诺具体幅度。他今年没有货币政策投票权。 美国劳工统计局周二公布,10月整体CPI环比上涨0.4%,低于9月的0.6%,但高于路透社调查经济学家预期的0.3%。能源价格涨势减弱,未能使整体数据降至市场预期水平。 剔除食品和能源后的核心CPI…

11 Nov 2026, 04:30 UTC274 viewsread 11 November 2026

韩国KOSPI指数涨幅扩大至2%,SK海力士涨逾4% 【韩国KOSPI指数涨幅扩大至2%,SK海力士涨逾4%】金色财经报道,11月11日,韩国KOSPI指数涨幅扩大至2%,SK海力士涨逾4%,三星电子涨超3%。(财联社) 交流群

11 Nov 2026, 04:10 UTC351 viewsread 11 November 2026

美股半导体股夜盘集体反弹 英伟达涨2.4% 闪迪涨4.62% 【美股半导体股夜盘集体反弹 英伟达涨2.4% 闪迪涨4.62%】金色财经报道,11月11日,美股半导体板块夜盘多数走高,存储芯片及光通信板块表现活跃。按24小时行情,SK海力士涨7.20%,Lumentum涨5.88%,Coherent涨5.74%,迈威尔科技涨5.21%,闪迪涨4.62%,美光科技涨4.45%,AMD涨4.23%,博通涨3.11%,台积电涨3.13%,英伟达涨2.38%。三倍做多半导体ETF(SOXL)涨10.65%。(财联社) 交流群

11 Nov 2026, 04:08 UTC346 viewsread 11 November 2026

火币HTX首席分析师Cloud:加密市场杠杆出清已较充分,短线继续深跌空间有限 【火币HTX首席分析师Cloud:加密市场杠杆出清已较充分,短线继续深跌空间有限】金色财经报道,11月11日,美国10月CPI高于预期,数据公布后BTC一度跌至7.3万美元附近,市场开始押注12月加息50个基点,对此,火币HTX首席分析师Cloud认为,加息50个基点的概率不高,25个基点仍是基准情形,当前下跌更接近定价纠偏。理由有三:美联储看重数据的连续性,历史上因单月CPI跳档而改变加息节奏的案例极少,单月超预期不足以推翻渐进路径;本轮通胀粘性主要来自关税与房租的滞后传导,会自然衰减,就业边际也在走弱,委员会没有理由在传导高峰上再叠加激进紧缩;信用利差已从93个基点走阔至348个基点,金融条件实质收紧,再加50个基点等于主动制造金融稳定风险。 加密市场上,资金费率转负,永续合约未平仓量一周下降近两成,恐惧贪婪指数跌入深度恐惧区间,杠杆出清已比较…

11 Nov 2026, 04:03 UTC276 viewsread 11 November 2026

渣打:美联储加息50基点的情境有所增强 但还不能下定论 【渣打:美联储加息50基点的情境有所增强 但还不能下定论】金色财经报道,11月11日,渣打表示,目前来看美联储12月或加息0.5个百分点的可能性在增加,但还未到可以下定论的程度。“潜在通胀似乎没有下降的趋势,反而可能上升,”Steve Englander和Dan Pan等策略师在报告中表示。“在通胀率高于目标水平的情况下,如果通胀率保持平稳,那么采取观望态度是合理的;但如果通胀率似乎正在上升,那就没有什么理由继续等待了”。 交流群

11 Nov 2026, 04:01 UTC295 viewsread 11 November 2026

金色午报 | 11月11日午间重要动态一览 【金色午报 | 11月11日午间重要动态一览】7:00-12:00关键词:Gram、高盛、以太坊基金会 1.Telegram CEO:代币Gram仍被严重低估; 2.美联储传声筒”:更大幅度、更快加息的压力正在加大; 3.美联储官员Paulson称目前逐步收紧政策似乎是合适的; 4.高盛预计美联储将在今年12月和2027年3月各加息25个基点; 5.韩国在野党议员宋彦锡:韩国应直接废除加密货币所得税计划; 6.以太坊基金会关联钱包于9小时前再次抛售1000枚ETH,约合203万美元。 交流群

11 Nov 2026, 03:47 UTC363 viewsread 11 November 2026

高盛预计美联储将在今年12月和2027年3月各加息25个基点 【高盛预计美联储将在今年12月和2027年3月各加息25个基点】金色财经报道,11月11日,高盛预计美联储将在今年12月和2027年3月各加息25个基点,此前预测为今年12月加息。(金十) 交流群

Showing the 12 most recent of 2,162 posts we hold for @jinseBTC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

金色财经新闻频道
@jinse2017 · 22,579
#1
币圈财经新闻
@Btc_789 · 3,892
#2
分叉财经(crypto news)
@fenchacaij · 229,746
#3
币圈动态
@biquan321 · 11,290
#4
逆途⚔️𝓡𝓲𝓬𝓱
@Cor_Leone0 · 9,429
#5
幣圈超級賽亞人(主動私訊你的是騙子)
@cake102468 · 10,479
#6
币圈快讯
@btcnewsdaily · 5,028
#7
幣圈Buffett_kama
@hdshdgjashds · 14,527
#8
幣勝客_加密趨勢捕捉
@cryptoelroy · 13,250
#9
TMGM币圈分析比特币交易策略🚀
@btcyouliang · 28,032
#10
Crpking的投资心理知识库
@zhigebtcchat · 5,844
#11
招財貓-幣圈合約最强Trader
@crypto_achan_tw · 7,469
#12
TechFlow 深潮 | 加密货币&区块链新闻
@TechFlowDaily · 18,813
#13
BlockBeats
@theblockbeats · 38,136
#14
Cointime中文资讯
@cointime_cn · 3,225
#15
币㊙️快讯|Web3|AI|BTC ETH SOL|比特币 以太坊|MEME|新闻
@bimi_chs · 8,394
#16
Bitcoin天道-暗池機構♾️
@btc100w100w2 · 6,768
#17
feiyangkanbi
@feiyangkanbi · 27,100
#18
金十数据 闪电资讯
@jin10light · 22,196
#19
黎叔 加密货币市场 走势分析
@crypto_technical_anlysis · 2,501
#20
币圈实时资讯|行情交流
@BTCvipnews · 3,653
#21
Leo-加密貨幣頻道
@Xboshi1 · 21,443
#22
链捕手 ChainCatcher
@chaincatcher · 9,795
#23
Captain_艦長_幣圈合約戰艦
@Bitgetxizi · 5,077
#24
Aatrox 加密社區
@bitgetMrcrab · 2,245
#25
Toncoin 中文频道
@toncoin_cn · 136,262
#26
幣圈趨勢分析-Bit帶你飛🌈
@bitget_voyager · 11,708
#27
王德发复盘室
@btclts1234 · 400
#28
【Colin】幣圈研究所
@crypto_colin · 8,527
#29
⟦Zero⟧—加密貨幣
@Bitget_crypto1 · 5,155
#30
東哥Crypto JB唯一电报公开频道
@JBcryptotrader881117 · 5,405
#31
三马哥币圈分析(币安或油管确认)
@sanmage · 28,318
#32
金十数据
@jin10data · 11,276
#33
Simba 幣圈合約王
@simbacryptoking · 5,381
#34
寫輪眼致富基地(主動私訊都是騙子)
@Traderfenggecn · 5,442
#35
Saber Alpha | 加密信號研究 🌐
@news_crypto00 · 2,870
#36
PANews Web3丨加密货币丨区块链新闻频道
@ChannelPANews · 23,587
#37
Circle ‘s 分享区
@Circlebtc12 · 7,936
#38
金色财经
@jinsecaijinpingdao · 216,229
#39
砸鍋賣鐵去炒幣
@bitgetnico · 11,462
#40
UMIE_加密貨幣
@IvanCryptotalk · 6,005
#41
幣圈航海王(駛向牛市的方向)
@aicoincn0 · 800
#42
Ashley帶你賺U
@Ashley_uulai · 8,757
#43
Odaily资讯速递
@Odaily_News · 19,659
#44
CC-短線刺客交易圈
@cryptoslaowai2 · 6,883
#45
【华尔街见闻】- 财经时讯 | AI 实时互动
@FinanceNewsDaily · 59,368
#46
Foresight News
@foresightnews · 19,224
#47
MoonPulse 月律 | Moontok.io
@MoonPulse_Channel · 10,305
#48
强胜集团合约策略分析
@QsNB88 · 6,560
#49
🎗华城跨境🎗币圈每日新闻
@hc_bq · 286
#50
幣圈殺手🥷
@jackscryptohk · 1,618
#51
章魚船長🚢加密貸幣巨輪
@heyueSunbeams · 699
#52
Crypto_獵捕者合約帝
@oobbb1 · 21,723
#53
以太坊币圈行情分析频道
@btc18688 · 29,552
#54
东南亚大事件 @svip
@bx666 · 462,405
#55
BTC-ETH【策略分析🛫】
@ETHeth1688 · 2,699
#56
『以命为棋』实盘策略分析🚀
@BTC8883 · 2,112
#57
【比特币】币圈策略分析🇨🇳
@eth77896bnb · 9,013
#58
海外大事件 @USD1
@usd1 · 259,960 (as read 17 September 2026)
#59
Seven-加密貨幣社區
@fanji8888 · 13,572
#60
胖丁❤️個人投資筆記
@btc_dingLoVeTS · 3,086
#61
波段猛牛-加密衝鋒隊
@pionexcn_MN · 3,140
#62
舒琴比特币行情资讯(其他均为仿冒)
@bitebishuqin · 45,513
#63
比特币峰哥公开频道
@TraderfenggeTG · 33,021
#64
R總的合約交易頻道
@rzong392888 · 7,599
#65
『 豪仔說幣』— 閃擊牛市💰
@btc1868888 · 3,783
#66
汉城DJ歌单(78.com 冠名 )
@gedan · 10,425
#67
吴哥时报
@wgsb · 184,476 (as read 17 September 2026)
#68
Crypto Hunters|造富工坊
@pepeboost168888 · 5,613
#69
「DJ十七音乐私人订制」金富德州 @JFDZ 冠名
@dj17 · 70,082
#70
動區動趨 BlockTempo⚡️區塊鏈 加密貨幣新聞
@blocktemponews · 37,715
#71
【巴西素材】海外素材/生活/美食/套图/风景/旅行/汽车/购物/居家/运动/自拍素材
@baxi_sucai_taotu · 147
#72

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

金色财经新闻频道
@jinse2017 · 22,579
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 September 2026
Telo News 简体中文 - 加密货币|DeFi |Web3
@telonews_cn · 79,871
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
狗狗币Dogecoin频道🚀
@doge365 · 17,558
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 October 2026
金十数据 闪电资讯
@jin10light · 22,196
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
金色财经
@jinsecaijinpingdao · 216,229
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
分叉财经(crypto news)
@fenchacaij · 229,746
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
Toncoin 中文频道
@toncoin_cn · 136,262
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
观水谭 A股市日记 🅥
@Guanshuitan · 33,890
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 1 October 2026
三马哥币圈分析(币安或油管确认)
@sanmage · 28,318
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
【华尔街见闻】- 财经时讯 | AI 实时互动
@FinanceNewsDaily · 59,368
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
Btok News
@BtokMedia · 260,678
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
Odaily资讯速递
@Odaily_News · 19,659
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 September 2026
新闻哥头条吃瓜每日热点
@yewaiTQ · 24,955
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 20 here — alongside 19 others — read 23 September 2026
PANews Web3丨加密货币丨区块链新闻频道
@ChannelPANews · 23,587
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 September 2026
TechFlow 深潮 | 加密货币&区块链新闻
@TechFlowDaily · 18,813
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 October 2026
华尔街日报
@HuaErJie1 · 60,247
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
币安公告
@binance_cn · 31,612
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
BlockBeats
@theblockbeats · 38,136
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
Coindesk
@Coindesk001 · 47,184
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 22 August 2026
互联网观察
@guanchahulw · 59,864
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 August 2026
TMGM币圈分析比特币交易策略🚀
@btcyouliang · 28,032
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
海外素材库
@sucai1 · 58,856
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 14 August 2026
feiyangkanbi
@feiyangkanbi · 27,100
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
Floki & TokenFi 中文社区入口
@flokiinuchina · 183,000
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“金色财经/币圈快讯7*24小时” (@jinseBTC), 23,946 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jinseBTC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.