Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Русская Фортепианная Школа

@russianpiano

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18,913subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725307449
TypeChannel
Username@russianpiano
DescriptionГенеральный продюсер: Табриз Шахиди @TabrizSuper Идеолог проекта - Эдуард Багиров PR/GR: Кристина Барсегян @keisy001 Контент-менеджер: @mercury_timothee РКН: https://clck.ru/3M3DL3
Created6 June 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/russianpiano

Growth

18,91318,92918,9216 August 2026 — 18,924 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,924 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,927 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,929 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,925 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,923 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,919 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,917 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,916 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,913 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,911–18,931 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:5318,913-3
13 Aug 2026, 17:5818,916-1
12 Aug 2026, 14:0618,917-2
11 Aug 2026, 16:1518,919-4
10 Aug 2026, 16:0418,923-2
9 Aug 2026, 13:1318,925-4
8 Aug 2026, 15:1018,929+2
7 Aug 2026, 18:4318,927+3
6 Aug 2026, 02:1518,924no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:3018,924first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 12 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
126.6%
avg views ÷ 18,913 subscribers
Avg views / post
23,900
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.138%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held18 (12 June 202614 August 2026)
Views total47,883
Reactions total66
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
572
Videos
551
Links
955

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
38m 43s
Average length
3m 52s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

849 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
40747.9%
🔥19823.3%
👍11113.1%
👏809.42%
❤‍🔥536.24%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 849reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
69
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 18 we hold a reading for · 56%
Most on one post
19
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @russianpiano. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 June 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC883 views20 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🎹 МАРИНА ЯХЛАКОВА (фортепиано) Пётр Чайковский - «Приглашение к трепаку», соч.72 Трепак — не просто одна из старинных русских плясок. В XIX веке он сыграл важную роль в отечественной культуре, став, по сути, частью культурного кода. Описание трепака встречается в сочинениях многих русских писателей, например, в романе Льва Толстого «Война и мир», повести Николая Гоголя «Вий», рассказе Максима Горького «Сторож». Жа

9🔥8👍3

3 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC≈47,000 views46 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🎹 ДАНИИЛ АБРОСИМОВ (фортепиано) Фредерик Шопен - Полонез ми-бемоль минор, соч.26 №2 Редкая даже для романтиков тональность ми-бемоль минор определяет мрачный и драматичный характер этого полонеза. Его главная тема, как это нередко бывает у Шопена, рождается из тревожного гула низкого регистра, из резкого взрыва энергии — и затем медленно, с сопротивлением и страстью, движется к своей кульминации. Трио необычно мног

28👍13👏5

15 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTC≈3,830 views83 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @keisylifeVideo

Классный ролик сделали коллеги из #ИРИ с анонсом нашего Проекта на телеканале «МЫ». К слову, на всех платформах: НТВ+, PREMIER, OKKO и тд) #РусскаяФортепианнаяШкола

🔥4522👍13❤‍🔥3

13 Jul 2026, 09:07 UTC≈3,260 views26 reactions3 Starsread 15 August 2026
Video

🎹 ИГОРЬ НОСЕНКО (фортепиано) Исаак Альбенис - «Кадис» из «Испанской сюиты» Альбенис задумал «Испанскую сюиту» в 1886 году как сборник из восьми пьес, каждая из которых имела бы географическое название и была посвящена определённому региону Испании, включая Кубу. При жизни композитора опубликованы только четыре пьесы, и лишь 20 лет спустя сюита в том виде, в котором её задумал автор, была собрана издателем и представ

13👏10🔥3

6 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC≈3,640 views49 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🎹 СОФИЯ ПЕТРОВА (фортепиано) Иоганн Себастьян Бах - Прелюдия и фуга ля-бемоль мажор из I тома «Хорошо темперированного клавира» Прелюдия и фуга ля-бемоль мажор образуют на первый взгляд светлый, ясный и даже торжественный цикл. Однако если тональность ми-бемоль мажор с тремя бемолями при ключе во времена Баха олицетворяла собой Троицу и часто использовалась для праздничных, торжественных духовных сочинений (в ней пр

33👏8❤‍🔥6🔥2

2 Jul 2026, 15:27 UTC≈3,480 views59 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Новосибирск официально стал ключевым городом «Русской Фортепианной Школы» в Сибири. Вместе с Леонидом Ярмольником вручили мэру города Максиму Кудрявцеву специальный диплом, подписанный генеральным продюсером Проекта Табризом Шахиди. В ближайших планах, а именно 26 ноября в Новосибирске пройдёт концерт с участием амбассадоров и молодых пианистов нашего Проекта.

🔥3320👏4👍2

2 Jul 2026, 15:24 UTC≈2,910 views27 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @kudryavtsevmaksimPhoto

Встретился с Леонидом Ярмольником – известным актером, продюсером, общественным деятелем, хорошо известным и любимым многими зрителями по своим ролям в популярных кинофильмах. В наш город он приехал в рамках проекта «Русская Фортепианная Школа». Это масштабная инициатива по поиску, поддержке и продвижению талантливых юных пианистов и популяризации отечественного музыкального наследия. Проект объединяет молодых лауре

21👍6

30 Jun 2026, 09:04 UTC≈2,920 views53 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🎹 ЮРИЙ МОИСЕЕВ (фортепиано) Сергей Рахманинов - Прелюдия ля-бемоль мажор, соч.23 №8 Сборник из десяти прелюдий под опусом 23 был создан в 1901–1903 годах: это время нового творческого подъёма для композитора, недавно преодолевшего тяжелый двухлетний кризис. Выходом из кризиса стал знаменитый фортепианный концерт №2, и его стиль заметно повлиял на прелюдии. В этом сборнике внутренние душевные переживания Рахманинова

❤‍🔥2018🔥11👍4

29 Jun 2026, 15:12 UTC≈70,800 views86 reactions17 Starsread 15 August 2026

❗️Объявляем имена участников третьего сезона Проекта «Русская Фортепианная Школа» Экспертная комиссия, в состав которой вошли выдающиеся педагоги, профессора Московской консерватории и мастера — амбассадоры Проекта «Русская Фортепианная Школа», — рассмотрела заявки пианистов из России и зарубежных исполнителей, обучающихся в России. Участники Проекта выступят на главной академической сцене страны — в Большом зале М

50🔥23👏9👍4

28 Jun 2026, 08:55 UTC≈2,780 views62 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026

Друзья, уже завтра! Мы объявим результаты отбора в третий сезон нашего Проекта. В новом сезоне в 2027 году к нам присоединятся 30 новых пианистов из разных регионов и стран. Имена тех, кто представит Проект, мы опубликуем в нашем канале на Дзене! Плейлист из 394 записей участников второго сезона можно смотреть и слушать по ссылке 🎞️

🔥3414👍14

23 Jun 2026, 12:54 UTC≈3,830 views42 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🌟Концерт амбассадора «Русской Фортепианной Школы» в Москве Максим Милославский выступит с сольной программой «Вечер при свечах» в Коломенском. В программе — Бетховен, Шуман, Шопен, Рахманинов и Лист. От масштабной классики до головокружительной виртуозности романтизма. 27 июня, 18:00 Музей-заповедник «Коломенское». Дворец царя Алексея Михайловича. Театральная Хоромина. 🎫 Билеты

24👏14🔥4

23 Jun 2026, 09:05 UTC≈43,900 views43 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🎹 ВЛАДИМИР КАРЯКИН (фортепиано) Сергей Рахманинов - Прелюдия соль-диез минор, соч.32 №12 В 1910 году, после нескольких лет, посвященных крупной форме — операм, симфонии, фортепианному концерту, — Рахманинов вновь возвратился к жанру фортепианной миниатюры. В новый цикл опус 32 вошли тринадцать прелюдий. Такое количество было связано с тем, что Рахманинов, подобно «Хорошо темперированному клавиру» Баха или циклам Шо

❤‍🔥2413👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @russianpiano. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 114,961 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Русская Фортепианная Школа” (@russianpiano), 18,913 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russianpiano.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.