Что там с открытием Ормузского пролива? Иран передал США через Катар семидневный план прекращения огня, пообещав разблокировать жизненно важный для мировой торговли Ормузский пролив. В Тегеране поспешили объявить, что почва для соглашения полностью готова, если у американцев есть реальное желание договариваться. --------- Однако, как сообщает The Wall Street Journal со ссылкой на чиновников, Дональд Трамп иранскую и…

Channel
ПолитГид
@explaining
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
106,718subscribers
+1,022 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001266185090 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @explaining |
| Description | Простым языком о сложной политике. Связь с редакцией - @politgidych Реестр РКН - https://clck.ru/3FG8Kf |
| Created | 21 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/explaining |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 106,718 | -45 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 106,763 | -88 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:42 | 106,851 | -101 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 106,952 | -154 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 107,106 | -84 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 107,190 | -85 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 107,275 | -36 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 107,311 | -69 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:34 | 107,380 | -68 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 107,448 | +168 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 107,280 | +109 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 107,171 | +70 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 107,101 | +163 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 106,938 | +143 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 106,795 | -34 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 106,829 | -41 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 106,870 | +189 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 106,681 | +242 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 106,439 | +173 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 106,266 | first reading |
Engagement
191 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.1%
- avg views ÷ 106,718 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 21,400
- 98 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 98
- of 191 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 191 (30 July 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,097,800 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 22:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,860
- Videos
- ≈432
- Links
- ≈1,950
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 17s
- Average length
- 1m 17s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Видно, что для армян российская база ассоциируется с обеспечением безопасности. Так что пробросы Пашиняна «да эта база нам и не нужна» совсем мимо.
Окончательные итоги выборов ЦИК официально утвердил результаты голосования за девятый созыв парламента. Кампания выдалась рекордной сразу по нескольким показателям. ----------- Итак, «Единая Россия» забрала конституционное большинство с рекордными 349 мандатами. КПРФ хоть и осталась на втором месте с 37 местами, но былого отрыва уже нет — им в затылок дышат ЛДПР (23 кресла), «Новые люди» (19) и эсеры (17). При этом …
Фишка в том, что Франция хочет защитить НПЗ и трубопровод для перекачки нефти в красноморском порту Янбу. А этот порт стал одним из главных узлов поставок дизельного топлива, сырой нефти и других нефтепродуктов в Европу с начала войны с Ираном.
Что там с обновлением Госдумы? Депутатский корпус в новом созыве обновится на 43%, сообщают источники РБК. Сильнее всего перетряхнёт фракцию ЛДПР — там появится сразу 65% новичков, а меньше всего перемен у КПРФ (всего 13,5%). Заодно примерно на треть изменится и руководство палаты. ----------- Если по сути, то система сохраняет проверенный управленческий костяк, но точечно освежает ряды. Вячеслав Володин остаётся на…
Эрдоган снова пытается добиться прекращения огня в Чёрном море. Однако Украина такое не поддерживает. А значит есть база для ухудшения украино-турецких отношений.
Проект нового бюджета готов. Что там? Минфин внёс в правительство проект федерального бюджета на 2027–2029 годы. Главный финансовый документ страны свёрстан предельно аккуратно, исходя из консервативной цены на нефть в $50 за баррель и с умеренным дефицитом около 2% ВВП. --------- Если говорить простыми словами, власть продолжает выдерживать формулу «и на оборону хватит, и людям поможем». Несмотря на внушительные ра…
А причём тут Южная Корея? Вероятно, там хотят северокорейских солдат «приютить» для допросов и в целях пропаганды (нарратив: в свободолюбивую Корею бегут от тирании).
Что там со встречей Трампа и Си Цзиньпина? Председатель КНР прибыл в Вашингтон с трёхдневным визитом, а Дональд Трамп устроил китайскому коллеге беспрецедентно роскошный приём прямо на летном поле. --------- Президенты США не встречали иностранных лидеров лично у трапа самолёта уже больше десяти лет (со времен визита папы римского в 2015 году). А тут — пролёт сверхзвуковых бомбардировщиков, оркестр и заявления о том…
Что там с выборами в региональных столицах? Избиркомы подвели итоги голосования в городские парламенты. В административных центрах процент «Единой России» местами оказался ниже, чем пять лет назад, но партия власти всё равно сохранила контроль над гордумами. ---------- Секрет такого парадокса прост. Городской избиратель традиционно считается более сложным и протестным — в том же Петрозаводске за ЕР по спискам прогол…
В Польше смекнули, что надо перед Трампом лебезить, унижаться и чуть ли не жопу целовать, чтобы его лояльность сохранить 🤷🏻♂️
Фридман и Усманов навели суеты в европейских санкциях Послы стран Евросоюза договорились исключить миллиардеров Алишера Усманова и Михаила Фридмана из чёрного списка. Но взамен устроили масштабный политический торг. ---------- В Евросоюзе произошёл редкий прецедент: послы стран ЕС согласовали исключение крупных российских бизнесменов из санкционных списков. Однако «подарок» случился не просто так, а в рамках сложног…
Showing the 12 most recent of 191 posts we hold for @explaining. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@explaining edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 20 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 20 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@EvPanina · 136,1312 postsМАРТЫНОВ
@martynov2021 · 208,3062 postsРаспутица
@rasputicaa · 127,5552 postsЮрий Баранчик
@barantchik · 90,1901 postБелНовости
@belnewsby1 · 51,1301 postБП онлайн
@bponline · 111,1201 postДоктор Z прописал
@docpro · 141,2331 postТемы. Главное (ГлавМедиа)
@glavmedia · 66,5761 postЛукабек
@lukabekkk · 39,0301 postМЕЛЬНИЦА
@Melnitsa21 · 25,3101 postНовосибирск, что делать?
@nskevent · 1851 postНОВОСТИ 📰
@russica2 · 745,2751 postДруид
@wisedruidd · 59,0661 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@mysly · 160,924#1
@variantnews · 134,801#2
@polittemnik · 201,201#3
@go338 · 143,325#4
@oko_ok · 127,999#5
@rosskandal · 124,945#6
@new_world_Z · 108,425#7
@Z_strana · 112,400#8
@stranoved · 115,552#9
@maester · 301,661#10
@terrupr · 80,796#11
@af_nikit · 7,999#12
@politadequate · 262,199#13
@fakecontrol · 109,075#14
@top_biz · 106,379#15
@RusUnlimited · 105,926#16
@ia_steklomoy · 109,841#17
@v9utra · 74,146#18
@karaulny · 120,244#19
@PolitTransit · 85,645#20
@mislinemisli · 153,747#21
@itiltg · 75,461#22
@trubapodneglinnoy · 135,312#23
@mardanaka · 209,055#24
@decembrist_spb · 79,784#25
@kremlebezBashennik · 67,001#26
@economika · 143,492#27
@hellotransfer · 410,123#28
@kremlin_bashnya · 7,500#29
@actual_comment · 1,031#30
@vibornyk · 101,972#31
@pltrk · 5,661#32
@vprorok · 12,854#33
@staraya · 91,881#34
@neduma · 2,552#35
@vizioner_rf · 78,782#36
@alenasivkova · 1,631#37
@prispru · 453#38
@stukch · 12,374#39
@boilerroomchannel · 225,139#40
@operdrain · 125,664#41
@Nikitina_Life · 245#42
@WCIOMofficial · 17,282#43
@obuhovpro · 5,648#44
@kstati_p · 233,639#45
@kompr · 47,630#46
@RIAKremlinpool · 67,983#47
@ddofa · 192,915#48
@rostov_na_konu · 94,508#49
@regnum_na · 68,422#50
@nom24 · 3,650#51
@SerpomPo · 57,241#52
@Vinogradov74 · 28,255#53
@ru_global · 54,489#54
@Contora_Pishet · 93,410#55
@steven_bb · 702,168#56
@evgenyprimakov · 19,695#57
@moskovskiyPul · 171,981#58
@gusev_tg · 20,444#59
@docpro · 141,233#60
@kbrvdvkr · 80,361#61
@dddjournalism · 132,182#62
@streli_kazbeka · 128,064#63
@regdurdom · 102,474#64
@prosmis · 102,305#65
@politjoystic · 250,578#66
@southtower · 111,696#67
@Ms_krasota · 63,539#68
@topgun_spb · 35,218#69
@TelegaKubani · 116,790#70
@mnews_ru · 200,406#71
@belgorpost · 61,187#72
@basmannoesamoupravlenie · 720#73
@besedki_nasedki · 61,177#74
@imerkouri · 58,752#75
@mediatech · 147,643#76
@kprfmgd · 368#77
@guber2 · 4,122#78
@kitchen_chef · 84,311#79
@blacklander · 48,916#80
@nightguber · 52,510#81
@volgograd_tg · 45,375#82
@vashbashdomovoy · 43,672#83
@MedvedevVesti · 183,029#84
@PRiangarskie · 42,313#85
@niemandswasser · 8,928#86
@primorchannel · 54,146#87
@dr_alex_sosnowski · 114,231#88
@kshulika · 55,734#89
@Gubery · 84,687#90
@zakuliska · 36,631#91
@stormdaily · 69,800#92
@kurskpost · 34,132#93
@gov_korotko · 28,628#94
@nashirayony · 2,723#95
@kleveta · 10,301#96
@vybora · 40,304#97
@planerka_org · 48,628#98
@shorohi64 · 42,637#99
@pzdcofficial · 54,505#100
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@top_biz · 106,379
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
@new_world_Z · 108,425
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@steven_bb · 702,168
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
@Z_strana · 112,400
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
@v9utra · 74,146
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
@terrupr · 80,796
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
@RusUnlimited · 105,926
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@besedki_nasedki · 61,177
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
@Ms_krasota · 63,539
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
@itiltg · 75,461
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
@mysly · 160,924
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@variantnews · 134,801
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
@kitchen_chef · 84,311
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
@fakecontrol · 109,075
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
@docpro · 141,233
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@PolitTransit · 85,645
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
@blacklander · 48,916
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 26 August 2026
@oko_ok · 127,999
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
@prosmis · 102,305
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
@neuroskep · 29,484
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
@kurskpost · 34,132
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
@productivity_Q · 26,585
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
@navigator_32 · 23,960
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 September 2026
@topgun_spb · 35,218
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПолитГид” (@explaining), 106,718 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/explaining.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.