Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Академия Эдюсон (Eduson)

Channel

Академия Эдюсон (Eduson)

@edusondaily

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,497subscribers

-60 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001405613880
TypeChannel
Username@edusondaily
DescriptionУчитесь вместе с нами: https://www.eduson.tv/~tg Ведущий сервис онлайн-обучения. На наших курсах вы можете получить новую профессию или навык, нужный для работы. Задать вопрос: @manager_eduson РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/679345b6c5a24d7a901fa625
Created1 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/edusondaily

Growth

20,49720,55720,5276 August 2026 — 20,557 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,557 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,549 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,536 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,531 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,524 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,519 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,517 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,502 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,497 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,488–20,566 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 07:1520,497-5
14 Aug 2026, 00:2720,502-15
12 Aug 2026, 21:1820,517-2
11 Aug 2026, 17:5720,519-5
10 Aug 2026, 17:1720,524-7
9 Aug 2026, 18:1120,531-5
8 Aug 2026, 14:2420,536-13
7 Aug 2026, 12:1520,549-8
6 Aug 2026, 08:4120,557no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:1820,557first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.98%
avg views ÷ 20,497 subscribers
Avg views / post
407
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held17 (29 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total6,913
Reactions total112
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,390
Videos
82
Links
1,020

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

98 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4748.0%
🔥2828.6%
👍1212.2%
🙏55.10%
👏33.06%
22.04%
🤝11.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC257 views2 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

📚✨ Что читают сотрудники Эдюсон? Невозможно растить крутых специалистов, если не развиваешься сам. В нашей команде с самого начала сложилась культура непрерывного обучения: мы регулярно изучаем новые исследования, читаем книги и статьи. А главное — структурируем эти знания и делимся инсайтами друг с другом. Ведь чтобы доносить ценность обучения до других людей, нужно соответствовать самим 🤍 Листайте карусель — со

2

14 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC243 views5 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Каждый, кто хоть раз самостоятельно делал ремонт, знает это чувство: вроде выбрали и цвет, и мебель, а собрать всё вместе в голове не получается. Вот 3 промпта, которые помогут визуализировать ваш проект — сохраняйте и пробуйте. Если хотите разобраться, как применять нейросети в работе и жизни, посмотрите наши образовательные материалы по нейросетям и выберите подходящее направление: https://eduson.academy/ai-all

2🔥2👏1

12 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC369 views4 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

3 промпта, которые сделают ваше резюме в несколько раз заметнее На треть больше резюме и на 19% меньше вакансий — вот с чем рынок труда столкнулся в первом полугодии 2026 года. Такие данные приводит SuperJob. Представьте: рекрутер открывает вакансию и видит не 20 откликов, как год назад, а в разы больше. У него есть пара секунд на каждое резюме, прежде чем решить — читать дальше или листать следующие. Собрали три

🙏21🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC381 views12 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Бизнес разделился на два лагеря Одни отвечают на кризис сокращением бюджетов и команд. Другие — пересматривают процессы, автоматизируют рутину и усиливают сотрудников с помощью ИИ. Вопрос в том, успеете ли вы внедрить нейросети раньше конкурентов. 3 сентября в 18:00 пройдёт бесплатная конференция Eduson AI Forum. Вместе с ИИ-практиками рынка разберём, как оптимизировать операционку, маркетинг и продажи с помощью н

5🔥42👍1

10 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC385 views13 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Люди, которые доверяют ИИ больше всего задач, боятся его меньше остальных. Новое исследование Anthropic объясняет, почему так происходит. ИИ может анализировать данные, помогать в планировании и давать советы по развитию бизнеса. Главное — знать, как правильно формулировать запросы. Если хотите разобраться, как применять нейросети в своей работе, посмотрите наши курсы по нейросетям и выберите направление, которое п

5👍4🔥4

7 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC504 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Карточка товара, обложка для сторис, пост для соцсетей — почти любой бизнес регулярно нуждается в визуале, а бюджета на фотографа и дизайнера хватает не всегда. Собрали три промпта, которые закрывают эту задачу с помощью нейросети. Дублируем запросы в текст, чтобы вам было удобнее копировать 👇 Промпт 1. Премиальный продукт на пьедестале «Сдержанный премиальный стиль: объект [название товара] в виде дорогого брендо

4🔥2🤝1

6 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC461 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Дарья работала на шинном заводе, растила двоих детей и совмещала это с тяжёлым бытом и сложным разводом. Сейчас она работает удалённо на маркетплейсах, сама регулирует свою нагрузку и впервые за долгое время ощущает спокойствие. Мы взяли интервью у Дарьи, чтобы узнать, как она прошла этот нелёгкий путь. Листайте карточки ❤️‍🩹 Если тоже чувствуете, что пора что-то менять, но не знаете, с чего начать — выберите подхо

🔥53👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @edusondaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 190,545 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Стадика — стажировки, стипендии, обучение
@studyqa · 156,969
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Soft Skill | Навыки
@iAmbitious · 126,361
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Академия Эдюсон (Eduson)” (@edusondaily), 20,497 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/edusondaily.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.