4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,864–1,870 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 00:44
1,869
+4
9 Aug 2026, 18:44
1,865
-1
6 Aug 2026, 15:55
1,866
no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:47
1,866
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 28 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 1,869 subscribers
Avg views / post
231
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held
19 (28 April 2026 – 27 July 2026)
Views total
231
Reactions total
15
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 43s
Average length
1m 34s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
378 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
188
49.7%
👍
49
13.0%
🎉
44
11.6%
🏆
44
11.6%
❤
40
10.6%
⚡
4
1.06%
😁
4
1.06%
💯
3
0.794%
🤔
1
0.265%
🤩
1
0.265%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 378reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
72
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 19 we hold a reading for · 79%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @brainsderivatives. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 April 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Когда я бегаю в соревновательном режиме, мне нравится ощущать себя машиной по переработке километров
Такой взгляд на себя заставляет избавиться от любой шелухи и сосредоточиться на эффективности лишь одной выполняемой задачи — настоящий поток!
💊 Мои колёса спустя два года
В 2024 г. я рассказал о том, какие добавки использую для того, чтобы держать свои суставы и мышцы в отличном состоянии. С тех пор набор немного изменился, и я хочу поделиться этим хорошо проверенным обновлением
Что не изменилось:
— магний: New Leaf Magnesium Glycinate 4-in-1 Complex 2000mg. Мощная штука, я просто забыл такое, чтобы у меня сводило ноги. Мышцы всегда в суперработоспособн…
⛽️ Топливо
Не люблю соревноваться, когда баки пустые, поэтому утром перед стартом ем сладенькое практически бесконтрольно
Мой хит-парад составляют всего две позиции:
1. Пончик-берлинер с джемом
2. Блинцы с кленовым сиропом из макдака
А что обязательно наяриваешь ешь перед стартом ты?
🧠 Боль — это слабость, покидающая твоё тело
Шикарная мотивационная фраза, которую я вспоминаю, когда на тренировке становится трудно. Говорят, пришла к нам от морпехов США, а в оригинале я увидел её на футболке одного из участников очередного забега: Pain is weakness leaving the body
Конечно, важно отличать "рабочую" боль, связанную с адаптацией организма к нагрузке, от травматической. Иначе никаких серьезных дости…
🥁🥁🥁 Как и обещал, выкладываю карточки для саппорта, которые были подготовлены и использовались моей мини-командой на летнем бэкъярде на прошлой неделе. Для зимнего список нужно скорректировать
📚 Спрессованная мудрость, проверенная в действии!
Пишу инструкцию для моего брата, который в роли саппорта уже через пять дней отправит меня на первый круг The LONGBRIDGE 100 Backyard Ultra
Роль саппорта возрастает с каждым кругом, а у нас с ним не очень много такой командной игры именно в беге, поэтому будем учиться срезать мозоли прямо во время забега
Цель у нас общая: победить. С другой целью в голове на бэкъярд не выходят, иначе можно сойти раньше. Я посмотрел…
🍿 Мама, я хочу на бэкъярд!..
...хотя это вообще не моя ключевая дисциплина. Зачем? Я хочу исследовать границы своего мозга и их производных, а также мои физические возможности!
Бэкъярд — это бесконечная гонка на вылет, где нужно выходить на старт каждый час и успеть пробежать 6.7 км внутри этого часа. Не успел пробежать — вылетел. Не вышел на старт — вылетел. Побеждает тот, кто пробежит круг в одиночку, когда вылет…
🥟 Наглядно подсобрал текущие personal best на тех дистанциях, которые бегаю регулярно на соревнованиях: в каждый год выбран лучший результат
Пока удаётся расти везде, и есть прикольный момент: лучшая десятка (32:57) и лучший полумарафон (69:42) сделаны в одном темпе по 3:18 мин/км
Ответ кроется в абсолютно разных условиях, в которых проходили забеги:
— десятка в два круга в Гайд-парке в Лондоне была в меру холмист…
🔥9🏆5❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @brainsderivatives. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🧠 Мозг и его производные — Сергей Предко” (@brainsderivatives), 1,869 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brainsderivatives.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.