Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for дизайнерс

Channel

дизайнерс

@dsgners

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,294subscribers

-164 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001377864573
TypeChannel
Usernames@dsgners @dsgnerspublic
Created22 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dsgners

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

19,29419,45819,3766 August 202626 September 2026
64 measurements spanning 51 days, net -164. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,269–19,483 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 22:2219,294-2
26 Sept 2026, 18:1919,296-15
19 Sept 2026, 17:3819,311no change
19 Sept 2026, 15:4019,311-12
17 Sept 2026, 03:5719,323no change
17 Sept 2026, 01:3919,323-8
15 Sept 2026, 02:0219,331-3
15 Sept 2026, 01:0219,334-9
13 Sept 2026, 14:1619,343-1
13 Sept 2026, 09:1519,344-8
11 Sept 2026, 17:5519,352-1
11 Sept 2026, 09:5819,353-8
9 Sept 2026, 01:3819,361-2
8 Sept 2026, 16:5919,363-13
5 Sept 2026, 18:3719,376-1
5 Sept 2026, 08:0219,377-8
3 Sept 2026, 16:1919,385-2
3 Sept 2026, 09:4319,387no change
2 Sept 2026, 11:0519,387+1
2 Sept 2026, 00:0519,386first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 1 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.64%
avg views ÷ 19,294 subscribers
Avg views / post
702
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held22 (1 April 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total1,403
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

571 reactions across 21 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤23841.7%
🔥15126.4%
❤‍🔥417.18%
💩295.08%
👀193.33%
🎉183.15%
🌚152.63%
🤔152.63%
🥰122.10%
😱111.93%
💔91.58%
🤩71.23%
⚡61.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 571 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC686 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @studiynayaPhoto

Ну всё, приехали Подводим итоги коллабы Студийной × дизайнерс. Весь август собирали ваши публикации, считали просмотры и следили за тем, кто сколько успел написать. Пришло время раздавать подарки. Получают бизнес-подписку на дизайнерс на полгода, посев по большой сетке каналов и 15-минутный аудит от Алексея Раменского: 🥇 Самая просматриваемая публикация — Relate 🥇 Больше всего публикаций — REB8T 🥇 Больше всего прос…

❤13🔥4

31 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC717 viewsread 3 September 2026

А вот и итоги нашего конкурса 🙂 Отпишем всем в течение недели

20 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC≈1,480 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Новость, которую вы точно не ждали Сейчас отовсюду кричат про AI, про необходимость дизайнеру проникаться этими технологиями. Кричат не зря, наверное это уже база, чтобы быть конкурентноспособными (да че говорить, если я сам помогаю делать дизайн раздела образования через клод). Уже начали появляться курсы и интенсивы, которые дают неплохой старт, для того что бы дизайнер встал на новые ai-рельсы. Пару месяцев наза…

🤔9❤1🌚1👀1

12 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC≈1,660 views22 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Кириллица: перезагрузка (2026) Хочу рассказать про ещё одни изменения, над которыми мы сейчас работаем. Сетка Кириллицы постепенно стала проседать по контенту и это не тот уровень публикаций, который хочется видеть в таких каналах. Хочу сделать космиический рывок в уровне контента, поэтому Кириллица становится частью дизайнерс и начинает свою новую главу. Три канала Кириллицы меняют названия: 🖤 Кириллица.дизайн →…

😱9❤7🔥3💔2❤‍🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC≈1,530 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Работа кипит, кп рассылаются, дизайн пилится, реинвестим деньги в рекламу. Что сделали: — разослали 30+ КП школам и менторам. Многие отмечают что реклама в телеге стухла и наше предложение выглядит свежо, больше 10 школ уже забронировали свои места. — пилим дизайн раздела образование. Смотрим наперед, не только как витрина с курсами, но и как контентную площадку с видосами, статьями и бесплатными обучающими програм…

❤9🔥4

10 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC≈1,590 views29 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Осень — время конкурсов и наград Когда у меня было агентство, мы всегда мечтали податься на ADCR Awards, и один раз мы все таки накопили денег и даже прошли в шорт-лист) У ребят всё строго: сам брендинг, критерии подачи, серьёзное жюри и критерии оценки. Но! Благодаря ADCR Awards нам начали поступать заявки на разработку брендинга, несмотря на то, что мы были только в шорт-листе, а значит конкурс работает. До 4 с…

🔥10👀8❤6🤔5

6 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈1,700 views36 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @evgenyuprockVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤22💩9🎉3🌚2

6 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈1,680 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Большой кредит доверия от ребят, будем оправдывать 🏆

❤3

6 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC≈3,940 views52 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Новое направление «Образование», UPROCK и два Жени Всем привет, ⚡️ Женя у телефона, и я продолжаю рассказывать про наши обновки) Сегодня хочу рассказать про одно важное направление, которое мы сейчас начинаем развивать в дизайнерс — Образование. На данном этапе уже запустили продажи в этом разделе, и нас очень тепло встретили. Сейчас мы стараемся найти такой формат, который позволял бы приносить школам результаты…

❤15🔥15💩8🤩7🌚3😱2🎉1👀1

4 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,600 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Крутые ребята × дизайнерс Всем привет, на связи снова ⚡️ Женя. С момента публикации первого поста прошло чуть меньше месяца, а работа уже во всю кипит! Но сегодня не хочу говорить про работу, а хочу отдельно посвятить эту публикацию крутым ребятам, которые безвозмездно сделали репост моего поста к себе в каналы. Я про вас не забыл, просто слишком сильно погрузился в коллабы и времени совсем мало, но лучше поздно, ч…

❤9🔥7🥰4🌚1

3 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC≈1,770 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Студийная × дизайнерс Коллабимся с медиа о диджитале Студийная и весь август собираем материалы от агентств, чтобы подарить лучшим бизнес-подписки и посевы Публикуйте на дизайнерс кейсы, статьи, туториалы, чек-листы, дайджесты и другие текстовые материалы — и отправляйте ссылки в @StudiynayaDSGNERSbot Участвовать могут все публикации, вышедшие на дизайнерс с 1 по 30 августа В конце месяца раздадим подарки: 🎙3 пр…

❤‍🔥6❤5🔥4

20 Jul 2026, 09:23 UTC≈2,340 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://dsgners.ru/tuman/47478-dizaynerskie-itogi-chempionata-mira-po-futbolu Офигенно интересная и актуальная статья

❤6🔥3❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @dsgners. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 82 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Учебник дизайнера
@dsgn_tutorial · 82,657
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
perasperadastra ✱ сучков саша
@perasperagram · 38,498
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Design Box | Дизайн, Графика, Figma
@dsgn_box · 45,822
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
UX/UI — UPROCK AWARDS
@uprockdesign · 21,659
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
Intelligent Design
@intelligentdsgners · 25,302
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
PSD | Дизайн-пространство
@psd_eu · 26,586
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 September 2026
Behance — Лучшие работы
@behancedsgn · 24,915
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
Книги для дизайнеров 📚
@dbooks · 63,360
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
Package Design
@package_design · 23,586
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 September 2026
Behancer | Лучшие дизайн-проекты с Behance
@behancerdsgn · 41,330
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
Божественный фотошоп
@design_hell · 30,078
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Дизайн образование
@dsgn_edu · 34,397
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
Дизайн-переводчик
@design_translator · 20,919
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 September 2026
Логово дизайнера
@lgvdsgner · 25,388
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
Секретный канал Логомашины
@logomachinee · 31,390
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
Саня Кво: дизайн, развитие и study kvo
@study_kvo · 25,327
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
Иллюстратор | Графика и Дизайн
@illustrt · 35,592
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
Figma за 60 секунд | Веб-дизайн
@figma60sec · 25,315
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
UI_UX inspiration
@uiux_design · 21,259
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 September 2026
ВидеоГуру | Монтаж, моушн-дизайн
@vidguru · 28,096
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
Дайджест продуктового дизайна
@pdigest · 49,453
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Дизайн-Телега 🔥
@design_telega · 79,070
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
Magazine Design
@magazine_design · 24,262
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
Дизайн-биржа 💵
@designbirzha · 52,674
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“дизайнерс” (@dsgners), 19,294 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dsgners.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.