Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Саня Кво: дизайн, развитие и study kvo

Channel

Саня Кво: дизайн, развитие и study kvo

@study_kvo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,093subscribers

-1,165 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001185692373
TypeChannel
Username@study_kvo
DescriptionКанал основателя Study Kvo. Здесь выходят видеоуроки, подкасты и кружочки с котом. 🔑 Клуб: https://sanya-kvo.ru/status Study Kvo в ВК: https://vk.com/study_kvo РКН https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/6787c7746aa9672b96b96f14 По рекламе: @sanya_kvo
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/study_kvo

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,09326,25825,675.57 August 2026 — 26,258 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,258 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,243 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,226 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,210 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,180 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,145 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,115 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,076 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,056 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,031 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,000 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,978 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,946 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,898 subscribers23 August 2026 — 25,872 subscribers25 August 2026 — 25,836 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,816 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,796 subscribers27 August 2026 — 25,763 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,740 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,735 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,722 subscribers31 August 2026 — 25,695 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,663 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,640 subscribers4 September 2026 — 25,604 subscribers6 September 2026 — 25,547 subscribers9 September 2026 — 25,475 subscribers12 September 2026 — 25,443 subscribers13 September 2026 — 25,413 subscribers15 September 2026 — 25,379 subscribers17 September 2026 — 25,327 subscribers29 September 2026 — 25,093 subscribers7 August 202629 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 54 days, net -1,165. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,918–26,433 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Sept 2026, 22:4125,093-234
17 Sept 2026, 22:0225,327-52
15 Sept 2026, 16:5725,379-34
13 Sept 2026, 23:5925,413-30
12 Sept 2026, 03:1625,443-32
9 Sept 2026, 21:3625,475-72
6 Sept 2026, 14:2225,547-57
4 Sept 2026, 02:5725,604-36
2 Sept 2026, 17:0225,640-23
1 Sept 2026, 14:2625,663-32
31 Aug 2026, 15:0325,695-27
30 Aug 2026, 18:2425,722-13
29 Aug 2026, 21:3825,735-5
29 Aug 2026, 00:1225,740-23
27 Aug 2026, 22:0325,763-33
26 Aug 2026, 22:0325,796-20
26 Aug 2026, 00:4225,816-20
25 Aug 2026, 01:1525,836-36
23 Aug 2026, 10:3525,872-26
21 Aug 2026, 22:2725,898first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.01%
avg views ÷ 25,093 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,010
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held44 (23 July 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total34,161
Reactions total1,258
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Oct 2026, 05:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
644
Videos
77
Links
243

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 26s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,034 reactions across 44 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣93930.9%
custom 535482078060768028649116.2%
🔥38112.6%
❤36512.0%
custom 53526525093179672582247.38%
😁1886.20%
🗿1725.67%
😭1344.42%
🤝270.89%
😍230.758%
👍170.56%
💔150.494%
💯150.494%
🙈120.396%
🙏120.396%
😱70.231%
🤩60.198%
⚡30.099%
🆒30.099%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,034 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 44 we hold a reading for · 41%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @study_kvo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2026, 16:23 UTC971 views35 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Ох как чешутся руки чтобы навалить деталей и позвать вас уже Осень будет продуктивной, вайбкодеры мои 😏

🔥19😍10custom 53548207806076802865custom 53526525093179672581

25 Sept 2026, 06:48 UTC≈1,700 views90 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Ну вот скажите мне, что я сделал интернету, что у меня только такие каптчи 😂 Дайте уже выбрать пожарныегидранты и пешеходные переходы, я соскучился

🤣65😁11custom 53548207806076802865custom 53526525093179672584🗿3❤2

24 Sept 2026, 15:24 UTC≈1,400 views23 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Как работать с трендами? Короче, вчера у нас в клубе был эфир с Анной Ягодой из Setters, на котором у меня, кажется, впервые в жизни сложилось понимание того, что такое тренды на самом деле и как они влияют Влияют и на дизайн, и на жизнь. Но я не про те, тренды, которые опошлены у нас в дизайне до уровня стеклянных кнопок или неоморфизма. Я про настоящие, которые влияют на всё и вся. Если вы в клубе и пока не смо…

custom 535482078060768028612❤8👍3

23 Sept 2026, 17:46 UTC≈1,440 views78 reactions2 Starsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Ситуация: сделал сервис, но не могу его отдать вам Короче, есть такой сервис, который позволяет загрузить два изображения и на выходе получить кусочек кода, который можно встроить в Behance и эффектно показывать светлую-тёмную темы, эскизы-дизайн, до-после и т.д. Простая интерактивная штука. Сервис старый, на мобилке в последнее время много глюков. Поэтому я на базе той же библиотеки решил сделать свой и отдать ва…

custom 535482078060768028639🔥25❤8😱4💔1🗿1

23 Sept 2026, 09:38 UTC≈1,450 views48 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Поднимите руку, кто задумывался про личный бренд, контент и вот это всё 🖐 Я больше 8 лет веду блог по дизайну — кто со мной ещё с уроков по Фотошопу, вы застали самый старт). И за это время я особенно хорошо понял одну вещь: делать контент можно сколько угодно, а вот монетизировать его — совсем другая задача. Как раз для таких задач есть Boosty - здесь есть возможность получать доход и поддержку от аудитории через…

custom 535482078060768028618❤14🔥9custom 53526525093179672585👍1🙈1

21 Sept 2026, 09:40 UTC≈1,680 views85 reactions1 Starread 2 October 2026
Photo

Новый день, новый удар по IQ

😭41🤣24🗿9custom 53526525093179672584custom 53548207806076802864😁3

20 Sept 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,880 views79 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Когда назвал себя резюме мидл-дизайнером и думал, что прокатит

🤣55custom 535482078060768028613❤4😭3🗿2😁2

18 Sept 2026, 15:41 UTC≈2,010 views28 reactionsread 2 October 2026

Формат, который за нами стали повторять Год назад я предложил участникам поработать 1 неделю над упаковкой работ в портфолио: 7 дней, 3 этапа. Так на Behance появились кейсы, которые долго пылились в Фигме. Оказалось, что одна неделя — достаточный срок, чтобы сделать одну сложную задачу или разобраться в сложной теме. С тех пор челленджей было 11: – упаковка работ – figma motion – ai-брендинг – figma slots – швейц…

❤14🔥5custom 53548207806076802865👍2custom 53526525093179672582

17 Sept 2026, 11:22 UTC≈2,010 views33 reactions1 Starread 2 October 2026
Photo

Открываю доступ к 130+ видеоурокам, 2 курсам, 7 подкастам, 12 прямым эфирам и 11 челленджам по дизайну И ещё ко всему тому, что будет дальше. Короче, открываю двери в клуб Status Kvo! Status Kvo — клуб, где ты непрерывно развиваешься как дизайнер, а каждый месяц глубоко прокачиваешь один конкретный навык: от компонентов и анимации до AI‑брендинга и whiteboard challenge. У нас несколько векторов сразу: – нейросети …

❤15custom 535482078060768028612🔥6

15 Sept 2026, 11:42 UTC≈2,150 views125 reactionsread 2 October 2026

Что-то временно, а что-то вечно: Вчера потратил 6 часов, чтобы сделать на threejs офигенную 3D-ленту с бегущим текстом: лента движется, с изгибами и спиралью, текст движется по ней, повторяет изгибы Сегодня за 1 минуту свежим взглядом удалил получившийся отстой

🤣74🤝20custom 535482078060768028611custom 53526525093179672589💔6😭4❤1

14 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC≈2,370 views35 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

ИИ головного мозга 🔫 Сейчас Claude выдаёт хороший дизайн, причём местами лучше, чем джуны и самоучки. В Figma полноценные агенты, в вакансии проникает вайбкодинг. Возникает вопрос: а что с этим, собственно, делать-то? В среду проведу эфир, где поделюсь своим видением и планом Он бесплатный. Без записи. Час-полтора. upd: вебинар завершен

🔥16custom 535482078060768028611❤3🤝2custom 53526525093179672582👍1

10 Sept 2026, 14:50 UTC≈2,700 views39 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Вчера помимо Айфона-раскладушки вышла ещё одна крутая штука! На Oblex появилась модель GPT Image 2.5. В последнем видео тесты показали, что 2-ая версия дала по жопе всем остальным, а тут 2,5 — ещё мощнее! Залетайте попробовать, модель доступная, а на Облексе всего от 18 токенов: oblex.ru/app Подвёз вам забавный промт, чтобы сделать из себя лего-человечка, но со своей головой 😁 Копируйте и попробуйте на своей фотке…

custom 535265250931796725824🔥11❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @study_kvo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Людочка, референсы!
@ludochka_ref · 13,801
#1
Alexey Bychkov, немножко блогер, дизайнер, фрилансер
@a1exeybychkov · 16,619
#2
Учебник дизайнера
@dsgn_tutorial · 82,657
#3
Дизайн Домашка
@designdomashka · 11,928
#4
GO Education | UX/UI Design
@goeducation_ru · 9,507
#5
Веб дизайн в Figma
@figmaweb · 40,614
#6
Design Hunters
@designhunters · 80,030
#7
Kris Anfalova | UI/UX дизайн | фриланс
@krisanfalova · 14,976
#8
Женя UPROCK
@evgenyuprock · 16,226
#9
Pixel Perfect | AI для диджитал-специалистов
@pixeleperfect · 8,488
#10
UX/UI — UPROCK AWARDS
@uprockdesign · 21,659
#11
Рефы, привет
@refs_hi · 9,630
#12
Yodiz x Zubkov
@yodizlife · 23,572
#13
Уроки по дизайну
@yodizsources · 13,361
#14
Дизайнерская
@dsgnerskaya · 10,932
#15
Дизайнер, привет
@jun_hi · 23,416
#16
UX/UI [by Uprock]
@uprockpro · 18,536
#17
Max Shirko — Design, Inspiration and Baldezh
@sayhellotomaxshirko · 10,305
#18
Интерес (ex. MDA) | Ai и Дизайн
@mda_web · 4,284
#19
Уха дизайнера
@uha_dsgn · 17,490
#20
design teacher | Туториалы для дизайнеров
@dsgn_teacher · 48,606
#21
Поясни за UX
@poyasnizaux · 20,009
#22
Вакансии дизайнерам
@jun_hi_vacancies · 42,790
#23
Дизайнерская мысль
@Design_ideaa · 16,078
#24
Андрей Богданов
@na_produkte · 1,980
#25
Дерзай в дизайн | школа веб-дизайна
@derzay_v_design · 5,046
#26
Вакансии для Дизайнеров
@design_jobs_uxui · 25,761
#27
Философия дизайна с Филипповой Софьей
@sofyafilippova · 3,928
#28
Behancer | Лучшие дизайн-проекты с Behance
@behancerdsgn · 41,330
#29
Design Box | Дизайн, Графика, Figma
@dsgn_box · 45,822
#30
BBE: UX/UI и продуктовый дизайн
@bbeuxui · 10,519
#31
Таня Старикова | Покоряем Грузию 🇬🇪
@tanya_diz_1 · 1,319
#32
Дизайн-карате. 1 день = 1 прием. Фотошоп и фигма
@Designkarate · 17,909
#33
Retro Figma
@retrofigma · 6,329
#34
Дайджест продуктового дизайна
@pdigest · 49,453
#35
duo sapiens*
@duosapiens · 15,318
#36
Вакансии для дизайнеров
@designer_vacancies · 22,846
#37
UI/UX Designer
@uxidesign · 20,725
#38
Обучение в Starbizzz / Мастер-классы / Марафоны
@starbizzz_start_wd · 911
#39
Кутузова о дизайне
@kutuzova_webdesign · 15,495
#40
Секси-цвет. Твое вдохновение
@sexycolors · 37,080
#41
Секретный канал Логомашины
@logomachinee · 31,390
#42
BBE:сплатно
@bbe_webinars · 10,607
#43
Много дизайна
@dsgn_tochka · 23,804
#44
UI/UX дизайнер
@design_mind · 14,626
#45
Оди
@awdee · 33,522
#46
Figma Fuel
@figma_fuel · 6,702
#47
Дизайнерам про законы
@legally_diz · 12,195
#48
Книги для дизайнеров 📚
@dbooks · 63,457
#49
Дизайн-переводчик
@design_translator · 20,919
#50
Secret Design
@secretd · 22,285
#51
FGM — всё для фигмы
@wtfigma · 13,768
#52
Now How Channel
@nowhow · 24,611
#53
Про дизайн – легко!
@tutdesigner · 13,952
#54
Макеты для верстки
@figma2html · 45,580
#55
Jobaem | Заказы дизайнерам
@jobaem · 7,423
#56
Людочка, плагины!
@ludochka_plugins · 19,399
#57
Людочка, дизайн!
@ludochka_design · 18,393
#58
Веб-дизайн | Уровень нормы
@levelofnorm · 8,175
#59
Figma Design
@figmadesign · 105,902
#60
дизайнерс.сайты
@cyrillicdesign · 34,919
#61
дизайнерс
@dsgners · 19,294
#62
Макеты Figma
@figma_maketss · 35,213
#63
Адовый UX
@uxfromhell · 50,337
#64
Што за шрифт?
@wtfont · 129,729
#65
Графический дизайн | Насмотренность
@graphicdesignlife · 9,102
#66
Джун Дизайнер - вакансии
@junior_designers · 19,903
#67
Секси-шрифт. Кириллица
@sexyfont · 134,323
#68
Figma за 60 секунд | Веб-дизайн
@figma60sec · 25,172
#69
Designdealer
@designdealer · 86,726
#70
Дизайн-Телега 🔥
@design_telega · 78,790
#71
Ozøn Design
@ozondesign · 18,026
#72
дизайнерс.приложения
@cyryllicapps · 4,716
#73
Дизайн-гусь
@designgoose · 22,957
#74
СПNЗЖУ DESIGN
@thedesigner · 29,834
#75
Mobile UI/UX
@mobileux · 9,946
#76
Сейф Дизайнера
@seif_designera · 60,994
#77
moCUPS | Мокапы для дизайнеров
@moCUPS · 60,822
#78
Шрифт. Дизайн.
@fontshrift · 12,704
#79
Только Figma
@onlyfigma · 14,988
#80
Сеньор Дизайнер
@senior_dsgner · 7,103
#81
Шрифтач | Дизайн
@shriftach · 38,950
#82
Dprofile. Работа
@dprofilejob · 17,705
#83
Фигматика | Figma
@figmatika · 8,033
#84
Вебдизайнерская
@webdsgnsky · 6,852
#85
Dprofile
@dprofileru · 10,418
#86
Дизайн Мэтч
@dsgn_match · 9,941
#87
Шаринган дизайнера | Figma
@glaza_ui · 7,138
#88
Плагины Figma
@pluginsfigma · 9,332
#89
Local Talent | Design
@local_talent · 9,143
#90
Айдентичность
@logo_as_art · 11,270
#91
Шрифтовик | Бесплатные шрифты
@fontovik · 74,813
#92
Дизайн образование
@dsgn_edu · 34,397
#93

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Yodiz x Zubkov
@yodizlife · 23,572
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 September 2026
UX/UI — UPROCK AWARDS
@uprockdesign · 21,659
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
Никита Юдаев о дизайне
@nikita_yudaev · 55,453
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
Людочка, плагины!
@ludochka_plugins · 19,399
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 October 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Саня Кво: дизайн, развитие и study kvo” (@study_kvo), 25,093 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/study_kvo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.